Literature DB >> 29179496

Prognostic role of myoferlin expression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Dae Hyun Song1,2,3, Gyung Hyuck Ko1,2,4, Jeong Hee Lee1,2,4, Jong Sil Lee1,2,4, Jung Wook Yang4, Min Hye Kim4, Hyo Jung An3, Myoung Hee Kang1,2,5, Kyung Nyeo Jeon1,2,6, Dong Chul Kim1,2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In patients with cancer, myoferlin protein hyperexpression has been correlated with poor patient prognosis. Here, we evaluated myoferlin expression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and investigated the prognostic significance of myoferlin expression in these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with ccRCC who underwent treatment at Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Korea, between January 2000 and December 2009 were enrolled. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on tissue microarray blocks produced from surgical specimens. Surgical specimen cancerous cells were graded as showing myoferlin hyperexpression or hypoexpression by comparison with intratumoral endothelial cells. Disease-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the relationships between myoferlin expression levels, risk factors, and prognosis.
RESULTS: Seventy-one of 304 cores exhibited myoferlin hyperexpression. T stage was not associated with myoferlin hyperexpression, whereas a high Fuhrman nuclear grade was significantly associated with myoferlin hyperexpression. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with T stage >2, Fuhrman nuclear grade >2, and those with myoferlin hyperexpression had poorer disease-free survival compared to those with lower T stage, lower Fuhrman nuclear grade, and myoferlin hypoexpression (all p <0.001). Furthermore, myoferlin hyperexpression was significantly associated with disease-free survival on Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio, 4.604; 95% confidence interval, 1.893-11.199; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Myoferlin expression could be a potential prognosticator in patients with ccRCC, and might be a useful marker for oncologic surveillance in such patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clear cell renal cell carcinoma; disease-free survival; immunohistochemistry; myoferlin; prognosis

Year:  2017        PMID: 29179496      PMCID: PMC5687666          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) accounts for 70–80% of RCCs [1], and ∼20–30% of these patients progress to an advanced stage (recurrence or distant metastasis) after surgery [2]. The frequency of postoperative radiologic surveillance, which consists of chest and abdominal radiologic imaging, is determined by a patient’s 5-year risk for recurrence or distant metastases [3, 4]. The tumor-node-metastasis staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [5] and Fuhrman nuclear grade [6] are well established predictive risk factors for recurrence. However, to ensure that treatment for patients with ccRCC patients is efficacious, additional reliable prognosticators are needed. Myoferlin protein expression has been recently associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancer [7-9]. The 6-membered Ferlin family are mammalian proteins that share homology with the Fer-1 family of Caenorhabditis Elegans [10] and include myoferlin, dysferlin, otoferlin, fer1L4, fer1L5, and fer1L6. Fer-1 defects have been associated with infertility due to the abnormal fusion of cellular membranes in developing sperm [11]. Ferlins have also been implicated in calcium-sensing, cellular repair, vesicle trafficking, and membrane fusion in skeletal muscle [12]. In normal embryonic development or muscle regeneration, myoferlin is highly expressed during myoblast fusion [12]. However, the physiological function(s) of myoferlin have not been fully elucidated. Myoferlin overexpression has been noted in gastric, thyroid, breast, colorectal, hepatic, pancreatic, ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers [13]. Furthermore, in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells, myoferlin depletion induced a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition, in vitro, and reduced tumoral proliferation and invasion, in vivo [14, 15]. Leung et al. showed tumorigenetic role of myoferlin [16]. According to recent clinical studies, patients with pancreatic or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma that showed myoferlin hyperexpression had poorer survival outcomes [9, 17]. Here, we investigated myoferlin expression in patients with ccRCC and evaluated the prognostic significance of myoferlin expression in these patients.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological data

The clinicopathological data of patients with ccRCC (n =152) are summarized in Table 1. There were 115 (75.7%), 12 (7.9%), 23 (15.1%), and 2 (1.3%) patients with T stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 disease, respectively. Twenty-five patients had progression of diseases, Of which nine patients exhibited metastatic ccRCC of the lung. And 6 patients showed metastasis to multiple organs, such as the lung, bone and/or brain. The majority of patients had Fuhrman nuclear grade 2 tumors. Of the 304 cores evaluated, 71 exhibited myoferlin hyperexpression (Hyper-MYOF), and 233 had myoferlin hypoexpression (Hypo-MYOF) (Figure 1A and 1B).
Table 1

Clinicopathological information of 152 clear cell renal cell carcinoma(RCC) patients

VariableValue (percentage)
Patients number152
Cores number of TMA304
Clinical informationAge [range]mean 59.9 [32–83]
Sex (Male/Female)109/43 patients
Advanced RCCLung metastasis9 patients
Multiple metastasis6 patients
Bone metastasis4 patients
Brain metastasis2 patients
Liver metastasis1 patients
Local recurrence3 patients
Follow-up periodMean 4.33 years
Patologic informationT stage1a91 (59.9%) patients
1b24 (15.8%) patients
2a9 (5.9%) patients
2b3 (2.0%) patients
3a21 (13.8%) patients
3b2 (1.3%) patients
42 (1.3%) patients
Fuhrman grade126 (17.1%) patients
2102 (67.1%) patients
319 (12.5%) patients
45 (3.3%) patients
MyoferlinHyperexpression71 (23.4%) cores
Hypoexpression*233 (76.6%) cores
Total152 patients304 cores

*, hypo-expression contains negative expression.

Figure 1

Examples of myoferlin staining grades

(A) Myoferlin hypoexpression. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells revealed weaker expression compared with capillary endothelial cells (arrow, endothelial cells; arrow head, ccRCC cells; Magnification x200). (B) Myoferlin hyperexpression. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells exhibited stronger expression compared with capillary endothelial cells (arrow, endothelial cells; arrow head, ccRCC cells; Magnification x200).

*, hypo-expression contains negative expression.

Examples of myoferlin staining grades

(A) Myoferlin hypoexpression. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells revealed weaker expression compared with capillary endothelial cells (arrow, endothelial cells; arrow head, ccRCC cells; Magnification x200). (B) Myoferlin hyperexpression. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells exhibited stronger expression compared with capillary endothelial cells (arrow, endothelial cells; arrow head, ccRCC cells; Magnification x200).

Correlation of myoferlin expression with T stage and Fuhrman nuclear grade in patients with ccRCC

The relationships between myoferlin expression and T stage are summarized in Table 2. There were no significant differences in the incidence of Hyper-MYFO among patients with T stage 1 and those with T stage ≥2 (Chi squared, p = 0.240). The relationships between myoferlin expression and Fuhrman nuclear grade are summarized in Table 3. A Fuhrman nuclear grade ≥3 was significantly associated with the incidence of Hyper-MYOF (Chi squared, p < 0.001).
Table 2

Correlation between myoferlin expression, T stage and Fuhrman nuclear grade in clear cell renal cell carcinomas

Myoferlin expressionTotalP value
Hypo*Hyper
T stage118050230P=0.240
≧2532174
Fuhrman nuclear grade1,220550255P<0.001
3,4282149
Total23371304

*, hypo-expression contains negative expression.

Table 3

Multivariate analyses of recurrent-free survival in 152 clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients

VariableDisease-free survivalDisease-specific survival
HR95% CIp valueHR95% CIP value
Age<59 vs.593.4971.372 - 8.9150.0090.9450.453-1.9720.880
Sexmale vs. female1.3390.428- 4.1910.6170.2210.084-0.5850.002
T stage1 vs. 2∼422.3137.719-64.494<0.00133.42010.938-102.109<0.001
Fuhrman grade1,2 vs. 3,42.9971.270-7.0700.0124.0091.694-9.4870.002
Myoferlinhypo vs. hyper4.6041.893-11.1990.0011.2400.490-3.1350.650
*, hypo-expression contains negative expression.

The significance of Hyper-MYOF on survival in patients with ccRCC

According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with Hyper-MYOF, high T stage (≥2), or high Fuhrman nuclear grade (≥3) had poorer disease-free survival (DFS, p <0.001) compared to patients with Hypo-MYOF (Figure 2A-2C). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that age ≥59 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.497; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.372–8.915; p = 0.009), T stage ≥2 (HR, 2.313; 95% CI, 7.719–64.494; p <0.001), Fuhrman nuclear grade ≥3 (HR, 2.997; 95% CI, 1.270–7.070; p = 0.012), and Hyper-MYOF (HR, 4.604; 95% CI, 1.893–11.199; p <0.001) were significantly associated with DFS (Table 3). Hyper-MYOF was not significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS, p = 0.650; Table 4).
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves

(A) Disease-free survival according to T stage. (B) Disease-free survival according to Fuhrman nuclear grade. (C) Disease-free survival according to myoferlin expression levels. High T stage, high Fuhrman nuclear grade, and myoferlin hyperexpression were all significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival.

Table 4

Clinicopathological information of advanced renal cell carcinoma patients with T1 stage tumor

Patient numberSex/ageT stageFurhman nuclear gradeMyoferlin expressionFollow up duration to recurrence (years)Recurrence
No.1M/641a2Hyper6Local recurrence
No.2M/671a3Hyper3.8Lung meta*
No.3M/711b3Hypo7.6Lung meta
No.4F/781a3Hypo3.4Bone meta
No.5M/721a1Hypo6.8Bone meta

*, meta means metastasis

Kaplan-Meier survival curves

(A) Disease-free survival according to T stage. (B) Disease-free survival according to Fuhrman nuclear grade. (C) Disease-free survival according to myoferlin expression levels. High T stage, high Fuhrman nuclear grade, and myoferlin hyperexpression were all significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival. *, meta means metastasis

DISCUSSION

In the present study, ccRCC patients with Hyper-MYOF had significant poorer DFS compared to those with Hypo-MYOF. However, Hyper-MYOF was not associated with DSS in patients with ccRCC. This is the first study to demonstrate an association between high myoferlin expression and prognosis in patients with ccRCC. Furthermore, a high Fuhrman grade was associated with Hyper-MYOF, whereas T stage was not associated with myoferlin hyperexpression. Here, we found that myoferlin might be a valuable prognostic marker in patients with ccRCC. Particularly, Hyper-MYOF had greater significance than the Fuhrman nuclear grade at predicting DFS. Furthermore, although, T stage is considered a valuable prognostic factor, in the present study, 5 patients with advanced T1 stage primary ccRCC, of whom 3 had Fuhrman nuclear grade 3 (high) and 2 had Fuhrman nuclear grade 2 (low), also had Hyper-MYOF (Table 4). Therefore, we suggest that even in patients with a low T stage, a high Fuhrman grade or Hyper-MYOF could indicate those that should be followed-up more carefully. There are some limitations to the present study. For example, Hyper-MYOF was not associated with DSS. The lack of effect on DSS could be because of biases. For example, patients with advanced ccRCC are treated using different therapies such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., sunitinib or pazopanib) and inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin. In addition, the initiation of treatment varied among the patients. Such differences could confound the data. Therefore, clinical evaluations considering such factors are needed to validate the significance of myoferlin expression on prognosis. In conclusion, myoferlin overexpression had an adverse prognostic role in patients with ccRCC and might be a valuable biomarker for ccRCC oncologic surveillance. Future studies to validate the role of myoferlin in the prognosis of such patients are warranted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

The clinicopathological data of patients with ccRCC patients who underwent treatment at Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea between January 2000 and December 2009 were obtained by reviewing clinical electronic charts, retrospectively. One-hundred and fifty-two patients with ccRCC were enrolled. All patients had undergone nephrectomy. The diagnosis was histopathologically confirmed by 2 experienced pathologists. All tumors were staged using the AJCC 7th system [5]. DFS was defined as the duration from the date of surgery to the date of tumor recurrence. DSS was defined as the duration from the date of surgery to date of death, which was mostly due to ccRCC. Advanced ccRCC with recurrence was diagnosed histopathologically via surgical biopsy or by radiography. A radiological diagnosis of lung metastasis was made when solitary or multiple spherical nodule(s) could be seen on chest computed tomography (CT) scans. Multiple lung metastases were variable in size and distributed throughout the pulmonary lobes. A radiological diagnosis of bone metastasis was made when solid enhancing masses or bone destruction became newly apparent on CT scans during follow-up. In all patients with radiologically suspected metastatic lesions, a final diagnosis was confirmed via CT-guided percutaneous biopsy and/or by combined positron emission tomography/noncontrast CT or scintigraphy [18, 19]. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gyeongsang National University Hospital (GNUH-2015-12-001) and was conducted in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Tissue microarray

Nephrectomy specimens were fixed in buffered neutral formalin (20%) overnight. Surgical samples were examined grossly and then embedded in paraffin blocks. Two representative glass slides from matched paraffin blocks were selected under microscopic review (Nikon Eclipse Ni). Two 2-mm tissue cores were obtained from each representative paraffin block that has representative Fuhrman nuclear grading at intratumoral area. and transplanted to new recipient tissue microarray blocks.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a primary myoferlin antibody (1:100 dilution; 7D6, Abcam, UK) as described previously [7]. The endothelial cells of the intratumoral vessels were used as a positive control. Slides from tissue microarray cores were graded by two experienced pathologists. If ccRCC cells exhibited stronger myoferlin expression compared with the membrane or cytoplasm of the endothelial cells then staining was graded as Hyper-MYOF. Similarly, if myoferlin expression was weaker than that of endothelial cells staining was graded as Hypo-MYOF. Negative expressed cases were contatined in Hypo-MYOF group. If the tumor cells showed heterogeneity of myoferlin in a core, representative value of the core was decided as a value of majority of tumor cells (more than 50%). Myoferlin expression of endothelial cells was reported in previous study [20]. And intratumoral endothelial cells were used as control of myoferlin expression.

Statistical analyses

Correlations between variables were determined using the Chi squared test. Cumulative survival times were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards regression model was conducted to compare variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS ver. 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
  20 in total

1.  Myoferlin is critical for endocytosis in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Pascal N Bernatchez; Arpeeta Sharma; Pinar Kodaman; William C Sessa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 2.  What can molecular pathology contribute to the management of renal cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Grant D Stewart; Fiach C O'Mahony; Thomas Powles; Antony C P Riddick; David J Harrison; Dana Faratian
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  CT evaluation for pulmonary metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancy.

Authors:  S D Davis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Normal myoblast fusion requires myoferlin.

Authors:  Katherine R Doherty; Andrew Cave; Dawn Belt Davis; Anthony J Delmonte; Avery Posey; Judy U Earley; Michele Hadhazy; Elizabeth M McNally
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Oncologic Surveillance After Surgical Resection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Novel Risk-Based Approach.

Authors:  Suzanne B Stewart-Merrill; R Houston Thompson; Stephen A Boorjian; Sarah P Psutka; Christine M Lohse; John C Cheville; Bradley C Leibovich; Igor Frank
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Myoferlin regulates cellular lipid metabolism and promotes metastases in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  A Blomme; B Costanza; P de Tullio; M Thiry; G Van Simaeys; S Boutry; G Doumont; E Di Valentin; T Hirano; T Yokobori; S Gofflot; O Peulen; A Bellahcène; F Sherer; C Le Goff; E Cavalier; A Mouithys-Mickalad; F Jouret; P G Cusumano; E Lifrange; R N Muller; S Goldman; P Delvenne; E De Pauw; M Nishiyama; V Castronovo; A Turtoi
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Simplification of the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zachary L Smith; Eugene J Pietzak; Chelsey K Meise; Keith Van Arsdalen; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz; Thomas J Guzzo
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.344

8.  Expression of myoferlin in human and murine carcinoma tumors: role in membrane repair, cell proliferation, and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Cleo Leung; Carol Yu; Michelle I Lin; Cristina Tognon; Pascal Bernatchez
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Myoferlin depletion in breast cancer cells promotes mesenchymal to epithelial shape change and stalls invasion.

Authors:  Ruth Li; William E Ackerman; Cosmin Mihai; Leonithas I Volakis; Samir Ghadiali; Douglas A Kniss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Loss of myoferlin redirects breast cancer cell motility towards collective migration.

Authors:  Leonithas I Volakis; Ruth Li; William E Ackerman; Cosmin Mihai; Meagan Bechel; Taryn L Summerfield; Christopher S Ahn; Heather M Powell; Rachel Zielinski; Thomas J Rosol; Samir N Ghadiali; Douglas A Kniss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Structural Basis for the Distinct Membrane Binding Activity of the Homologous C2A Domains of Myoferlin and Dysferlin.

Authors:  Faraz M Harsini; Anthony A Bui; Anne M Rice; Sukanya Chebrolu; Kerry L Fuson; Andrei Turtoi; Mazdak Bradberry; Edwin R Chapman; R Bryan Sutton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Correlation between myoferlin expression and lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji Min Na; Dong Chul Kim; Dae Hyun Song; Hyo Jung An; Hyun Min Koh; Jeong-Hee Lee; Jong Sil Lee; Jung Wook Yang; Min Hye Kim
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Human colon cancer cells highly express myoferlin to maintain a fit mitochondrial network and escape p53-driven apoptosis.

Authors:  Gilles Rademaker; Brunella Costanza; Justine Bellier; Michael Herfs; Raphaël Peiffer; Ferman Agirman; Naïma Maloujahmoum; Yvette Habraken; Philippe Delvenne; Akeila Bellahcène; Vincent Castronovo; Olivier Peulen
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 7.485

4.  Prognostic role of S100A9 expression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun Min Koh; Hyo Jung An; Gyung Hyuck Ko; Jeong Hee Lee; Jong Sil Lee; Dong Chul Kim; Dae Hyun Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Ferlin Overview: From Membrane to Cancer Biology.

Authors:  Olivier Peulen; Gilles Rademaker; Sandy Anania; Andrei Turtoi; Akeila Bellahcène; Vincent Castronovo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Myoferlin silencing inhibits VEGFR2-mediated proliferation of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyo Jung An; Dae Hyun Song; Hyun Min Koh; Yu-Min Kim; Gyung Hyuck Ko; Jeong-Hee Lee; Jong Sil Lee; Jung Wook Yang; Min Hye Kim; Deok Ha Seo; Se Min Jang; Dong Chul Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prognostic role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Hyun Min Koh; Dong Chul Kim; Yu-Min Kim; Dae Hyun Song
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Myoferlin, a multifunctional protein in normal cells, has novel and key roles in various cancers.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Bolun Zhou; Chenxuan Zhao; Zhengqing Ba; Hongjuan Xu; Xuejun Yan; Weidong Liu; Bin Zhu; Lei Wang; Caiping Ren
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Prognostic role of Rab27A and Rab27B expression in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun Min Koh; Dae Hyun Song
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Myoferlin, a Membrane Protein with Emerging Oncogenic Roles.

Authors:  Yimin Dong; Honglei Kang; Huiyong Liu; Jia Wang; Qian Guo; Chao Song; Yunlong Sun; Ya Zhang; Honghua Zhang; Zheng Zhang; Hanfeng Guan; Zhong Fang; Feng Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.