Literature DB >> 29179237

Older Age and Longer Epilepsy Duration Do Not Predict Worse Seizure Reduction Outcome after Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Jan Chrastina1, Jitka Kocvarova2, Zdenek Novak1, Irena Dolezalova2, Michal Svoboda3, Milan Brazdil2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the results of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on older patients and patients with long-lasting epilepsy and included severely intellectually disabled patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 adults with VNS implanted from 2005 to 2014 were studied. The responder rates, that is, the percentage of VNS patients who responded to VNS, classified as seizure reduction ≥ 50% (50R) and seizure reduction ≥ 90% (90R), were compared in defined age groups (< 40 and ≥ 40 years, and < 50 and ≥ 50 years) and epilepsy duration groups (< 20 and ≥ 20 years, < 30 and ≥ 30 years, and < 40 and ≥ 40 years) at the 1-year follow-up visit and the last follow-up visit (at least 2 years after surgery). The age distributions and responder rates were also studied in patients with an intellectual disability.
RESULTS: The analysis did not confirm a significantly lower 50R or 90R rate in patients ≥ 40, ≥ 50, or ≥ 60 years when compared with their younger counterparts, but the 50R rate increase during follow-up care was the lowest in patients ≥ 50 and ≥ 60 years. The highest percentage of patients with an intellectual disability in the group < 40 years of age did not adversely affect the 50R rate. Longer epilepsy duration was not confirmed as a negative predictor of VNS outcome. There was a significantly higher 50R rate in patients with epilepsy duration ≥ 20 years (at the last follow-up visit) and a higher 90R rate in patients with epilepsy duration ≥ 30 years (at the 1-year follow-up visit). The increase in the 50R rate during follow-up care was lower in patients with epilepsy durations ≥ 30 and ≥ 40 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The study did not find worse VNS outcomes, as defined by the 50R or 90R rate, in older adult patients or in patients with a longer epilepsy duration. The increasing stimulation effect over time is less marked in older patients and in patients with longer epilepsy duration. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29179237     DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg        ISSN: 2193-6315            Impact factor:   1.268


  2 in total

1.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy for the Treatment of Seizures in Refractory Postencephalitic Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yulin Sun; Jian Chen; Tie Fang; Lin Wan; Xiuyu Shi; Jing Wang; Zhichao Li; Jiaxin Wang; Zhiqiang Cui; Xin Xu; Zhipei Ling; Liping Zou; Guang Yang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  Health Technology Assessment Report on Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Authors:  Carlo Efisio Marras; Gabriella Colicchio; Luca De Palma; Alessandro De Benedictis; Giancarlo Di Gennaro; Marilou Cavaliere; Elisabetta Cesaroni; Alessandro Consales; Sofia Asioli; Massimo Caulo; Flavio Villani; Nelia Zamponi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.