Literature DB >> 29179051

Differences in pattern of variability for lower extremity kinematics between walking and running.

Amanda Estep1, Steven Morrison2, Shane Caswell3, Jatin Ambegaonkar4, Nelson Cortes5.   

Abstract

This study characterizes walking and running patterns in healthy individuals using linear and nonlinear methods Seventeen individuals (12 males, 5 females) volunteered for the study. 3D kinematic data during walking (WA) and running (RU) on a motorized treadmill were captured using reflective markers placed on lower body (200Hz). A single 25s trial (5000 data points) was collected for each gait task. WA speed was 1.39±0.12m/s, whereas RU speed was 2.56±0.27m/s. Variables of interest included ankle plantar/dorsi flexion, knee flexion/extension, knee abduction/adduction, hip flexion/extension, and hip abduction/adduction angles. For linear analysis, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for the entire time series for both conditions. Nonlinear analysis included assessing pattern of regularity of respective kinematic time series using approximate entropy (ApEn). Inferential analyses were conducted using MANOVA to compare selected dependent measures (p<0.05). SD for knee flexion/extension angle (WA=23.34±4.17, RU=27.51±5.25) and ankle plantar/dorsi flexion angle (WA=9.24±2.37, RU=12.88±2.00) were both greater during running. For all other variables, there were no significant differences in degree of variability between walking and running (p's>0.05). Running ApEn values were greater than walking ApEn values for knee flexion/extension (WA=0.14±0.02, RU=0.23±0.04), knee abduction/adduction (WA=0.18±0.07, RU=0.24±0.07), hip flexion/extension (WA=0.09±0.02, RU=0.17±0.04), and hip abduction/adduction (WA=0.12±0.03, RU=0.21±0.05). Greater variability was demonstrated during running across all joints compared to walking. This suggests that ApEn is more sensitive to detecting changes between different gait conditions than standard discrete measures of variability (SD).
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approximate entropy; Kinematics; Linear; Nonlinear; Regularity; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29179051     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  3 in total

1.  A non-linear analysis of running in the heavy and severe intensity domains.

Authors:  Ben Hunter; Andrew Greenhalgh; Bettina Karsten; Mark Burnley; Daniel Muniz-Pumares
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The Maximum Lyapunov Exponent During Walking and Running: Reliability Assessment of Different Marker-Sets.

Authors:  Antonis Ekizos; Alessandro Santuz; Arno Schroll; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  An Analysis of Lower Limb Coordination Variability in Unilateral Tasks in Healthy Adults: A Possible Prognostic Tool.

Authors:  Maryam Ghahramani; Billy Mason; Patrick Pearsall; Wayne Spratford
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.