| Literature DB >> 29178013 |
Kamil Piwowarek1, Edyta Lipińska2, Elżbieta Hać-Szymańczuk2, Anna Bzducha-Wróbel2, Alicja Synowiec2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the potential for biosynthesis of propionic acid and vitamin B12 by Propionibacterium freudenreichii T82 in a medium containing various sources of carbon (glucose, fructose, and saccharose). These sugars are present in apple pomaces, which are the waste from the production of apple juice. Using statistical analysis design of experiments (DoE), the results allowed us to determine which sugars (carbon sources) exert the most beneficial influence on the biosynthesis of propionic acid and cobalamin. The highest production of propionic acid by the tested bacterial strain was obtained in a medium in which glucose accounted for at least 50% of the available carbon sources. Depending on the culture medium, the concentration of this metabolite ranged from 23 to 40 g/L. P. freudenreichii T82 produced the smallest amount of acid in medium in which the dominant nutrient source was saccharose. The results obtained indicated an inverse relationship between the amount of acid produced by the bacteria and vitamin B12 biosynthesis. Because of the high efficiency of propionic acid biosynthesis by P. freudenreichii T82, the prospect of using this strain to obtain propionate with the simultaneous disposal of waste materials (such as apple pomaces) which contain glucose and/or fructose is very promising.Entities:
Keywords: Acetic acid; Carbon sources; DoE; Propionibacterium; Propionic acid; Vitamin B12
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29178013 PMCID: PMC5945763 DOI: 10.1007/s10482-017-0991-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek ISSN: 0003-6072 Impact factor: 2.271
Composition of sugars in model mediums
| Nr of medium | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX | X |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon sources (g/L) | ||||||||||
| Glucose | 25 | – | – | 12.5 | 12.5 | – | 16.6 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 8.33 |
| Frctose | – | 25 | – | 12.5 | – | 12.5 | 4.2 | 16.6 | 4.2 | 8.33 |
| Saccharose | – | – | 25 | – | 12.5 | 12.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 16.6 | 8.34 |
Changes in the content of carbon sources in media during propagation of Propionibacterium freudenreichii T82
| Carbon sources | Time (h) | Use (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nr of medium | Glucose | Fructose | Saccharose | 0 | 120 | |
| Sugars ratio in mediums | Carbon sources (g/L) | |||||
| I | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 91 |
| II | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 43.7 |
| III | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 18.2 ± 0.1 | 27.1 |
| IV | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 25 | 7.6 ± 0.2 | 69.5 |
| V | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 25 | 10.5 ± 0.2 | 57.9 |
| VI | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 25 | 17.4 ± 0.3 | 30.4 |
| VII | 0.664 | 0.168 | 0.168 | 25 | 7.7 ± 0.1 | 69.3 |
| VIII | 0.168 | 0.664 | 0.168 | 25 | 16.1 ± 0.0 | 35.4 |
| IX | 0.168 | 0.168 | 0.664 | 25 | 16.3 ± 0.1 | 34.6 |
| X | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 25 | 14.1 ± 1.0 | 43.7 |
During fermentation the pH was maintained at 7.0. Initial substrate concentration was 2.5%
Changes in optical density (OD) in media during propagation of Propionibacterium freudenreichii T82
| Nr | Time (h) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 120 | |
| OD | |||||
| I | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
| II | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 |
| III | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.0 |
| IV | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 2,0 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 |
| V | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
| VI | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 |
| VII | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 |
| VIII | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.1 |
| IX | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 |
| X | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.0 |
During fermentation the pH was maintained at 7.0. Initial substrate concentration was 2.5%
Production of acetic acid by the Propionibacterium freudenreichii T82 strain
| Nr | Time (h) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 120 | |
| Production of acetic acid (g/L) | |||||
| I | 2.8 ± 3.0 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 1.4 | 11.4 ± 2.3 | 12.4± 0.6 |
| II | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.5 |
| III | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 2.3 ± 1.8 |
| IV | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 3.1 ± 1.0 | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 7.6 ± 0.8 |
| V | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 4.9 ± 0.7 | 8.2 ± 5.0 |
| VI | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 1.7 ± 0.0 | 2.8 ± 0.4 |
| VII | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 1.1 | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 10.6± 0.3 |
| VIII | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 3.4 ± 0.4 |
| IX | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.8 |
| X | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.9 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 6.2 ± 0.1 |
During fermentation the pH was maintained at 7.0. Initial substrate concentration was 2.5%
Production of propionic acid by the Propionibacterium freudenreichii T82 strain
| Nr | Time (h) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 120 | |
| Production of propionic acid (g/L) | |||||
| I | 2.9 ± 1.6 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 15.1 ± 6.1 | 29.0 ± 5.8 | 40.4 ± 1.2 |
| II | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 1.4 | 12.1 ± 0.5 |
| III | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 3.7 ± 2.0 | 5.1 ± 2.8 |
| IV | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 8.1 ± 2.8 | 15.4 ± 2.8 | 23.9 ± 1.1 |
| V | 1.2 ± 1.9 | 2.7 ± 1.3 | 6.8 ± 2.6 | 11.5 ± 2.3 | 15.8 ± 2.2 |
| VI | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 1.8 |
| VII | 0.4 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 2.4 | 23.2 ± 2.8 |
| VIII | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 5.4 ± 1.3 | 13.5 ± 2.0 |
| IX | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 11.5 ± 0.3 |
| X | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 9.8 ± 0.7 | 16.2 ± 0.8 |
During fermentation the pH was maintained at 7.0. Initial substrate concentration was 2.5%
Fig. 1Pareto diagram showing the influence of the investigated factors on propionic acid production by P. freudenreichii T82 in 120 h of culture
Fig. 2Contour plot demonstrating production of propionic acid by P. freudenreichii T82 depending on the composition of the carbon source in medium. The results obtained for medium I–X according to Table 5 were taken into account
Production of vitamin B12 by the Propionibacterium freudenreichii T82 strain
| Carbon sources | Time (h) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | Fructose | Saccharose | 120 | |
| Nr | Sugars ratio in mediums | Vitamin B12 | ||
| I | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.32 ± 0.00 |
| II | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.54 ± 0.02 |
| III | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.33 ± 0.03 |
| IV | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.43 ± 0.03 |
| V | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.88 ± 0.04 |
| VI | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.39 ± 0.04 |
| VII | 0.664 | 0.168 | 0.168 | 0.35 ± 0.00 |
| VIII | 0.168 | 0.664 | 0.168 | 0.71 ± 0.02 |
| IX | 0.168 | 0.168 | 0.664 | 0.43 ± 0.01 |
| X | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.31 ± 0.01 |
During fermentation the pH was maintained at 7.0. Initial substrate concentration was 2.5%
Fig. 3Pareto diagram showing the influence of the investigated factors on vitamin B12 production by P. freudenreichii T82 in 120 h of culture
Fig. 4Contour plot demonstrating production of vitamin B12 by P. freudenreichii T82 depending on the composition of the carbon source in medium. The results obtained for medium I–X according to Table 6 were taken into account