Literature DB >> 29177789

Carotid near-occlusion frequently has high peak systolic velocity on Doppler ultrasound.

Simon R Khangure1,2, Hadas Benhabib3, Matylda Machnowska3,4, Allan J Fox3,4, Christer Grönlund5, Wendy Herod6, Robert Maggisano6,7, Anders Sjöberg5,8, Per Wester9,10, Seyed-Parsa Hojjat3,4, Julia Hopyan11, Richard I Aviv3,4, Elias Johansson8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Carotid near-occlusion is a tight atherosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) resulting in decrease in diameter of the vessel lumen distal to the stenosis. Near-occlusions can be classified as with or without full collapse, and may have high peak systolic velocity (PSV) across the stenosis, mimicking conventional > 50% carotid artery stenosis. We aimed to determine how frequently near-occlusions have high PSV in the stenosis and determine how accurately carotid Doppler ultrasound can distinguish high-velocity near-occlusion from conventional stenosis.
METHODS: Included patients had near-occlusion or conventional stenosis with carotid ultrasound and CT angiogram (CTA) performed within 30 days of each other. CTA examinations were analyzed by two blinded expert readers. Velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries were recorded. Mean velocity, pulsatility index, and ratios were calculated, giving 12 Doppler parameters for analysis.
RESULTS: Of 136 patients, 82 had conventional stenosis and 54 had near-occlusion on CTA. Of near-occlusions, 40 (74%) had high PSV (≥ 125 cm/s) across the stenosis. Ten Doppler parameters significantly differed between conventional stenosis and high-velocity near-occlusion groups. However, no parameter was highly sensitive and specific to separate the groups.
CONCLUSION: Near-occlusions frequently have high PSV across the stenosis, particularly those without full collapse. Carotid Doppler ultrasound does not seem able to distinguish conventional stenosis from high-velocity near-occlusion. These findings question the use of ultrasound alone for preoperative imaging evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Carotid stenosis; Internal carotid artery; Ultrasonography; X-ray computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29177789     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-017-1938-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  25 in total

1.  Carotid artery endarterectomy solely based on duplex scan findings.

Authors:  Karl Logason; Sadettin Karacagil; Hans-Göran Hårdemark; Annika Boström; Anders Hellberg; Christer Ljungman
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.089

Review 2.  Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods.

Authors:  Gerhard-Michael von Reutern; Michael-Wolfgang Goertler; Natan M Bornstein; Massimo Del Sette; David H Evans; Andreas Hetzel; Manfred Kaps; Fabienne Perren; Alexander Razumovky; Michael von Reutern; Toshiyuki Shiogai; Ekaterina Titianova; Pavel Traubner; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Lawrence K S Wong; Masahiro Yasaka
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 1--Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  E Johansson; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 2--Prognosis and Treatment, Pathophysiology, Confusions, and Areas for Improvement.

Authors:  E Johansson; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion.

Authors:  Allan J Fox; Michael Eliasziw; Peter M Rothwell; Matthias H Schmidt; Charles P Warlow; Henry J M Barnett
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; F M Chappell; J J K Best; K Wartolowska; E Berry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion with full collapse might cause a very high risk of stroke.

Authors:  E Johansson; K Öhman; P Wester
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Increased pulsatility of the intracranial blood flow spectral waveform on transcranial Doppler does not point to peripheral arterial disease in stroke patients.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Stanislava Kolieskova; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; Jessica Kepplinger; Amelia K Boehme; Timo Siepmann; Volker Puetz; Ulf Bodechtel; William D Jordan; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Detection of total occlusion, string sign, and preocclusive stenosis of the internal carotid artery by color-flow duplex scanning.

Authors:  M A Mansour; M A Mattos; D B Hood; K J Hodgson; L D Barkmeier; D E Ramsey; D S Sumner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnosing Carotid Near-Occlusion with Phase-Contrast MRI.

Authors:  E Johansson; L Zarrinkoob; A Wåhlin; A Eklund; J Malm
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion causes a high risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Thomas Gu; Richard I Aviv; Allan J Fox; Elias Johansson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Defining carotid near-occlusion with full collapse: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Elias Johansson; Thomas Gu; Allan J Fox
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.804

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.