Fergal Connolly1,2, Dara Byrne2,3, Sinéad Lydon2,3, Chloe Walsh1,2, Paul O'Connor1,2. 1. Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland. 2. Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland. 3. School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify the barriers to, and facilitators of, the implementation of physiological track and trigger systems (PTTSs), perceived by healthcare workers, through a systematic review of the extant qualitative literature. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in PUBMED, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase and Web of Science. The reference lists of included studies were also screened. STUDY SELECTION: The electronic searches yielded 2727 papers. After removing duplicates, and further screening, a total of 10 papers were determined to meet the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: A deductive content analysis approach was taken to organizing and analysing the data. A framework consisting of two overarching dimensions ('User-related changes required to implement PTTSs effectively' and 'Factors that affect user-related changes'), 5 themes (staff perceptions of PTTSs and patient safety, workflow adjustment, PTTS, implementation process and local context) and 14 sub themes was used to classify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of PTTSs. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Successful implementation of a PTTS must address the social context in which it is to be implemented by ensuring that the users believe that the system is effective and benefits patient care. The users must feel invested in the PTTS and its use must be supported by training to ensure that all healthcare workers, senior and junior, understand their role in using the system. CONCLUSION: PTTSs can improve patient safety and quality of care. However, there is a need for a robust implementation strategy or the benefits of PTTSs will not be realized.
PURPOSE: To identify the barriers to, and facilitators of, the implementation of physiological track and trigger systems (PTTSs), perceived by healthcare workers, through a systematic review of the extant qualitative literature. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in PUBMED, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase and Web of Science. The reference lists of included studies were also screened. STUDY SELECTION: The electronic searches yielded 2727 papers. After removing duplicates, and further screening, a total of 10 papers were determined to meet the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: A deductive content analysis approach was taken to organizing and analysing the data. A framework consisting of two overarching dimensions ('User-related changes required to implement PTTSs effectively' and 'Factors that affect user-related changes'), 5 themes (staff perceptions of PTTSs and patient safety, workflow adjustment, PTTS, implementation process and local context) and 14 sub themes was used to classify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of PTTSs. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Successful implementation of a PTTS must address the social context in which it is to be implemented by ensuring that the users believe that the system is effective and benefits patient care. The users must feel invested in the PTTS and its use must be supported by training to ensure that all healthcare workers, senior and junior, understand their role in using the system. CONCLUSION: PTTSs can improve patient safety and quality of care. However, there is a need for a robust implementation strategy or the benefits of PTTSs will not be realized.
Authors: Caroline S Langkjaer; Dorthe G Bove; Pernille B Nielsen; Kasper K Iversen; Morten H Bestle; Gitte Bunkenborg Journal: Nurs Open Date: 2021-02-27
Authors: Asya Agulnik; Gia Ferrara; Maria Puerto-Torres; Srinithya R Gillipelli; Paul Elish; Hilmarie Muniz-Talavera; Alejandra Gonzalez-Ruiz; Miriam Armenta; Camila Barra; Rosdali Diaz; Cinthia Hernandez; Susana Juárez Tobias; Jose de Jesus Loeza; Alejandra Mendez; Erika Montalvo; Eulalia Penafiel; Estuardo Pineda; Dylan E Graetz Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-03-01