| Literature DB >> 29176848 |
Mary K Mills1, Mark G Ruder2, Dana Nayduch3, Kristin Michel1, Barbara S Drolet3.
Abstract
Culicoides sonorensis biting midges are confirmed vectors of epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV), which causes mortality in white-tailed deer and ruminant populations. Currently, of the seven EHDV serotypes, only 1, 2, and 6 are detected in the USA, and very few studies have focused on the infection time course of these serotypes within the midge. The objective of this current research was to characterize EHDV-2 infection within the midge by measuring infection prevalence, virus dissemination, and viral load over the course of infection. Midges were fed a blood meal containing 106.9 PFU/ml EHDV-2, collected every 12 h from 0-2 days post feeding (dpf) and daily from 3-10 dpf, and cohorts of 20 C. sonorensis were processed using techniques that assessed EHDV infection and dissemination. Cytopathic effect assays and quantitative (q)PCR were used to determine infection prevalence, revealing a 50% infection rate by 10 dpf using both methods. Using immunohistochemistry, EHDV-2 infection was detectable at 5 dpf, and shown to disseminate from the midgut to other tissues, including fat body, eyes, and salivary glands by 5 dpf. Stain intensity increased from 5-8 dpf, indicating replication of EHDV-2 in secondary infection sites after dissemination. This finding is also supported by trends in viral load over time as determined by plaque assays and qPCR. An increase in titer between 4-5 dpf correlated with viral replication in the midgut as seen with staining at day 5, while the subsequent gradual increase in viral load from 8-10 dpf suggested viral replication in midges with disseminated infection. Overall, the data presented herein suggest that EHDV-2 disseminates via the hemolymph to secondary infection sites throughout the midge and demonstrate a high potential for transmission at five days at 25°C after an infective blood-meal.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29176848 PMCID: PMC5703522 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1IHC staining of EHDV-2 infected tissues throughout C. sonorensis.
Representative images were taken from orally infected midges at 7–10 dpf. (A) The internal anatomy of C. sonorensis revealed by a hematoxylin-stained sagittal section of the whole midge. No staining for EHDV-2 is provided in this section. Boxes indicate locations of tissues positive for EHDV-2 by IHC staining (red). (B) the neural lamella (dotted line) of the cerebral ganglia (cg); (C) salivary gland (sg), fat body (fb), trachea (t); (D) posterior midgut, cuticle (c); (E) ovarian sheath (os), ovariole (o); (F) Johnston’s organ (antenna); (G) eye containing the ommatidia (om) and optical ganglia (og); (H) fat body (fb); and (I) spermatheca, which contains the spermathecal epithelia (se), reservoir lumen (rl), and sperm (arrow). All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (blue) to reveal overall tissue structure. Scale bars: (A) = 200 μm, (B-D and F-I) = 25 μm, and (E) = 50 μm.
Fig 2EHDV-2 positive staining pattern in C. sonorensis by IHC over the course of infection.
Increasing intensity of IHC staining (red) showing progression of EHDV-2 infection in tissues over time, with representative images taken at 5 dpf (B, E, H, and K) and 8 dpf (C, F, I, and L), compared to negative control tissues (A, D, G, and J). This increase was observed in all infected tissues: (A-C) the midgut [midgut epithelium (e), fat body (fb), cuticle (c)]; (D-F) salivary glands (sg), [trachea (t)]; (G-I) fat body (fb); and (J-L) eye containing the ommatidia (om) and optic ganglia (og) [cerebral ganglia (cg)]. All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (blue) to reveal overall tissue structure. Scale bars = 25 μm.
Infection prevalence and viral load throughout EHDV-2 infection within the midge.
| dpf | Infectious VP | Total VP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % CPE positive | PFU per midge | % qPCR positive | Viral Genome Equivalents per midge | |
| 0 | 30 (6/20) | <1.39 (6) | 13 (2/15) | 7.81, 8.27 |
| 0.5 | 35 (7/20) | <1.39 (7) | 18 (3/17) | 6.66, 6.70, 7.10 |
| 1 | 40 (8/20) | <1.39 (7), 2.70 | 28 (5/18) | 7.15, 7.23, 7.27, 7.60, 7.69 |
| 1.5 | 55 (11/20) | <1.39 (10), 2.40 | 39 (7/18) | 6.91, 7.07, 7.32, 7.78, 7.54, 8.03, 8.11 |
| 2 | 39 (7/18) | <1.39 (7) | 50 (10/20) | 6.56, 7.47, 7.63, 8.11, 8.30, 9.32, 10.10, 11.17, 11.85, 12.61 |
| 3 | 50 (10/20) | <1.39 (10) | 41 (7/17) | 6.62, 6.74, 7.00, 7.35, 7.72, 8.33, 12.32 |
| 4 | 53 (9/17) | <1.39 (8), 1.88 | 56 (10/18) | 6.72, 7.01, 7.34, 7.42, 7.63, 7.96, 8.28, 11.88, 12.06, 13.85 |
| 5 | 20 (4/20) | <1.39 (1), 2.60, 3.53, 4.01 | 37 (7/19) | 6.38, 6.88, 7.20, 7.29, 7.54, 7.83, 15.41 |
| 6 | 30 (6/20) | <1.39 (6) | 31 (5/16) | 6.60, 6.73, 7.03, 7.51, 7.64 |
| 7 | 65 (13/20) | <1.39 (13) | 56 (9/17) | 6.45, 6.87, 6.93, 7.11, 7.18, 7.22, 7.78, 12.36, 15.48 |
| 8 | 35 (7/20) | <1.39 (3), 2.85, 3.68, 5.18, 5.48 | 45 (8/20) | 6.87, 6.94, 7.18, 7.22, 7.78, 12.36, 15.42, 15.48 |
| 9 | 45 (9/20) | <1.39 (7), 4.28, 5.10 | 90 (18/20) | 7.04, 7.11, 7.21, 7.30, 7.38, 7.40, 7.52, 7.62, 7.69, 7.89, 8.05, 8.08, 8.17, 8.26, 8.61, 9.22, 14.34, 14.85 |
| 10 | 50 (10/20) | <1.39 (7), 2.72, 4.90, 5.10 | 62.5 (5/8) | 6.66, 7.53, 8.59, 9.26, 14.49 |
*no. positive/n
** Log10/midge; n is denoted if n > 1. Samples with a PFU of <1.39 were CPE positive, but titer could not be determined as it was below the detection limit.
*** Log10/midge. Conversion of Ct values to total viral genome equivalents is based on calculation ratios published by Huismans et al. where 0.1 fg viral dsRNA is the genomic equivalent of 6 VPs [32].
Fig 3Whole body viral titer over the course of EHDV-2 infection within C. sonorensis.
Graph depicts the viral load per midge over the infection time course. Total VPs (black), were estimated by calculating genome equivalents (GE) by qPCR, and infectious VPs (red with 101.39 PFU/midge limit of detection: dotted line) were calculated by plaque assay. All samples are represented as median and interquartile range. Corresponding raw values are presented in Table 1.