Literature DB >> 29176350

Low participation in organized colorectal cancer screening in France: underlying ethical issues.

Grégoire Moutel1,2, Nathalie Duchange1, Astrid Lièvre3,4, Marie Brigitte Orgerie5, Odile Jullian6, Hélène Sancho-Garnier7, Sylviane Darquy8.   

Abstract

International studies have shown a significant reduction in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality following the implementation of organized screening programs, given a sufficient participation rate and adequate follow-up. The French national CRC screening program has been generalized since 2008 and targets 18 million men and women aged 50-74 years. Despite broad recommendations, the participation rate remains low (29.8%), questioning the efficiency of the program. A panel of experts was appointed by the French National Cancer Institute to critically examine the place of autonomy and efficiency in CRC screening and propose recommendations. In this paper, we explore the ethical significance of a public health intervention that falls short of its objectives owing to low take-up by the population targeted. First, we analyze the reasons for the low CRC screening participation. Second, we examine the models that can be proposed for public health actions, reconciling respect for the individual and the collective good. Our expert panel explored possible ways to enhance take-up of CRC screening within the bounds of individual autonomy, adapting awareness campaigns, and new educational approaches that take into account knowledge and analysis of sociocultural hurdles. Although public health actions must be universal, target actions should nonetheless be developed for nonparticipating population subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29176350     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  6 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical and practical challenges of proportionate universalism: a review.

Authors:  Florence Francis-Oliviero; Linda Cambon; Jérôme Wittwer; Michael Marmot; François Alla
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2020-10-15

2.  Awareness of risk factors and warning symptoms and attitude towards gastric cancer screening among the general public in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Xi Zeng; Wen Wang; Ruo-Lin Huang; Yan-Jin Huang; Shan Liu; Ying-Hui Huang; Ying-Xin Wang; Qing-Hong Fang; Guoping He; Ying Zeng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  [Theoretical and practical challenges of proportionate universalism: a reviewAnálise dos desafios teóricos e práticos de universalismo proporcional].

Authors:  Florence Francis-Oliviero; Linda Cambon; Jérôme Wittwer; Michael Marmot; François Alla
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2021-10-18

4.  Different information needs-The major reasons for calling the helpline when invited to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Kaisa Fritzell; Anders Kottorp; Anna Jervaeus
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  Factors Associated with Participation in Stool Based Colorectal Screening in Brunei Darussalam.

Authors:  Vui Heng Chong; Lydiana Kadir; Zakaria Kamis; Norhayati Kassim; Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil; Jackson Tan; Elvynna Leong; Sok King Ong; Chee Fui Chong
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-08-01

6.  Gastric Cancer Screening Methods: A Comparative Study of Two Scoring Methods.

Authors:  Weixing Zhang; Zhangzhi Li; Muhammad Safwan Akram; Muhammad Fayyaz Ur Rehman; Nazeer Hussain Khan; Dan Hu; Muhammad Mustaqeem; Yuanyuan Zeng; Fariha Kanwal
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.989

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.