OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between oral health and socioeconomic position in institutionalized older women in Mexico City. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in two groups: high socioeconomic position (HSEP), living in a private retirement home, and low socioeconomic position (LSEP), living in a public assistance center. Oral health was determined by edentulism, oral hygiene, healthy teeth, experience of dental caries, missing and filled teeth, gingival bleeding, dental calculus, and periodontal disease. A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to classify oral health status in dentate. RESULTS: Included were 170 women (HSEP 54.1% and LSEP 45.8%), average age 77.3 (SD = 9.3) years. Oral health status was formed: Edentulous 32.4% HSEP and 67.6% LSEP; Class 1 Unfavorable 0% HSEP and 100% LSEP; Class2 Slightly favorable 41.2% HSEP and58.8% LSEP; and Class3 Favorable 84.6% HSEP and 15.4% LSEP. There was a statistically significant association between socioeconomic position (p < .001) and oral health status. CONCLUSIONS: The oral health of women studied was not optimal. Higher socioeconomic position was associated with better oral health status.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between oral health and socioeconomic position in institutionalized older women in Mexico City. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in two groups: high socioeconomic position (HSEP), living in a private retirement home, and low socioeconomic position (LSEP), living in a public assistance center. Oral health was determined by edentulism, oral hygiene, healthy teeth, experience of dental caries, missing and filled teeth, gingival bleeding, dental calculus, and periodontal disease. A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to classify oral health status in dentate. RESULTS: Included were 170 women (HSEP 54.1% and LSEP 45.8%), average age 77.3 (SD = 9.3) years. Oral health status was formed: Edentulous 32.4% HSEP and 67.6% LSEP; Class 1 Unfavorable 0% HSEP and 100% LSEP; Class2 Slightly favorable 41.2% HSEP and58.8% LSEP; and Class3 Favorable 84.6% HSEP and 15.4% LSEP. There was a statistically significant association between socioeconomic position (p &lt; .001) and oral health status. CONCLUSIONS: The oral health of women studied was not optimal. Higher socioeconomic position was associated with better oral health status.
Authors: Winston Tseng; Elizabeth Pleasants; Susan L Ivey; Karen Sokal-Gutierrez; Jayanth Kumar; Kristin S Hoeft; Alice M Horowitz; Francisco Ramos-Gomez; Miku Sodhi; Jessica Liu; Linda Neuhauser Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stefano Cianetti; Chiara Valenti; Massimiliano Orso; Giuseppe Lomurno; Michele Nardone; Anna Palma Lomurno; Stefano Pagano; Guido Lombardo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 3.390