Literature DB >> 29175066

Randomized controlled trial comparing embryo culture in two incubator systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope.

Julie Barberet1, Jérémy Chammas1, Céline Bruno1, Elodie Valot1, Clarisse Vuillemin1, Lysiane Jonval2, Cécile Choux3, Paul Sagot3, Agnès Soudry2, Patricia Fauque4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether the closed culture system, as compared with a benchtop incubator with similar culture conditions, has a positive impact on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 386 patients undergoing ICSI cycles with at least six mature oocytes were randomized. INTERVENTION(S): Of these patients, 195 were assigned to the group with culture in a time-lapse imaging (TLI) system (EmbryoScope) and 191 to the group with culture in the G185 K-System (G185). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rate of implantation (primary endpoint) and embryo morphology grade. RESULT(S): No significant differences were found in the implantation rates. The proportion of high-grade embryos on day 2 was significantly higher in the TLI group compared with the G185 group (40.4% vs. 35.2%). The impact of the incubator on embryo morphology remained significant in multivariate analysis, which took into account the woman's age, the rank of attempt, and the smoking status (TLI vs. G185: odds ratio = 1.27; 95% confidence interval, [1.04-1.55]). No difference was found in the mean number of frozen embryos, even though the total proportion of frozen embryos was significantly higher in the TLI group than in the G185 group (29.5% vs. 24.8%). CONCLUSION(S): No difference in implantation rate was found between the two incubators for fresh cycles. It remains to be determined whether the observed differences in embryo morphology and the total number of embryos cryopreserved would translate into higher cumulative outcomes with subsequent frozen embryo transfers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT02722252.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed culture system; embryo culture; embryo morphology; implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29175066     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

2.  Analysis and quantification of female and male contributions to the first stages of embryonic kinetics: study from a time-lapse system.

Authors:  Céline Bruno; Abderrahmane Bourredjem; Fatima Barry; Jean Frappier; Aurélie Martinaud; Bruno Chamoy; Isabelle Hance; Perrine Ginod; Mathilde Cavalieri; Céline Amblot; Christine Binquet; Julie Barberet; Patricia Fauque
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?

Authors:  J Barberet; C Bruno; E Valot; C Antunes-Nunes; L Jonval; J Chammas; C Choux; P Ginod; P Sagot; A Soudry-Faure; P Fauque
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19

5.  Can Time-Lapse Incubation and Monitoring Be Beneficial to Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Day 3 Double Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Yu-Han Guo; Yan Liu; Lin Qi; Wen-Yan Song; Hai-Xia Jin
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.