Literature DB >> 29174894

Disruption of Perceptual Learning by a Brief Practice Break.

David F Little1, Yu-Xuan Zhang2, Beverly A Wright3.   

Abstract

Some forms of associative learning require only a single experience to create a lasting memory [1, 2]. In contrast, perceptual learning often requires extensive practice within a day for performance to improve across days [3, 4]. This suggests that the requisite practice for durable perceptual learning is integrated throughout each day. If the total amount of daily practice is the only important variable, then a practice break within a day should not disrupt across-day improvement. To test this idea, we trained human listeners on an auditory frequency-discrimination task over multiple days and compared the performance of those who engaged in a single continuous practice session each day [4] with those who were given a 30-min break halfway through each practice session. Continuous practice yielded significant perceptual learning [4]. In contrast, practice with a rest break led to no improvement, indicating that the integration process had decayed within 30 min. In a separate experiment, a 30-min practice break also disrupted durable learning on a non-native phonetic classification task. These results suggest that practice trials are integrated up to a learning threshold within a transient memory store before they are sent en masse into a memory that lasts across days. Thus, the oft cited benefits of distributed over massed training [5, 6] may arise from different mechanisms depending on whether the breaks occur before or after a learning threshold has been reached. Trial integration could serve as an early gatekeeper to plasticity, helping to ensure that longer-lasting changes are only made when deemed worthwhile.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distributed training; frequency discrimination; massed training; memory consolidation; non-native consonants; perceptual learning; speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29174894      PMCID: PMC5848209          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  45 in total

1.  Skill learning in mirror reading: how repetition determines acquisition.

Authors:  N Ofen-Noy; Y Dudai; A Karni
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07

Review 2.  About similar characteristics of visual perceptual learning and LTP.

Authors:  Kristoffer C Aberg; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Perceptual learning: how much daily training is enough?

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Andrew T Sabin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Benefits of efficient consolidation: short training enables long-term resistance to perceptual adaptation induced by intensive testing.

Authors:  Nitzan Censor; Dov Sagi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A post-tetanic time window for the reinforcement of long-term potentiation by appetitive and aversive stimuli.

Authors:  T Seidenbecher; K G Reymann; D Balschun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Differences between presentation methods in working memory procedures: a matter of working memory consolidation.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing.

Authors:  C L McClaskey; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

8.  Enhancing perceptual learning by combining practice with periods of additional sensory stimulation.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Andrew T Sabin; Yuxuan Zhang; Nicole Marrone; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Improvement and impairment of visually guided behavior through LTP- and LTD-like exposure-based visual learning.

Authors:  Christian Beste; Edmund Wascher; Onur Güntürkün; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Differential effects of tactile high- and low-frequency stimulation on tactile discrimination in human subjects.

Authors:  Patrick Ragert; Tobias Kalisch; Barbara Bliem; Stephanie Franzkowiak; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  6 in total

1.  Audiovisual training rapidly reduces potentially hazardous perceptual errors caused by earplugs.

Authors:  David J Audet; William O Gray; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Priority coding in the visual system.

Authors:  Nicole C Rust; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Non-sensory Influences on Auditory Learning and Plasticity.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Max F K Happel; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Pablo Ripollés; Sarah M Keesom; Laura M Hurley; Luke Remage-Healey; Lori L Holt; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  Change deafness can be reduced, but not eliminated, using brief training interventions.

Authors:  Vanessa C Irsik; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-06

5.  Tactile angle discriminability improvement: roles of training time intervals and different types of training tasks.

Authors:  Wu Wang; Jiajia Yang; Yinghua Yu; Qiong Wu; Jiabin Yu; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A comprehensive quality assessment framework for scientific events.

Authors:  Sahar Vahdati; Said Fathalla; Christoph Lange; Andreas Behrend; Aysegul Say; Zeynep Say; Sören Auer
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.