Literature DB >> 29173821

Assessment of quality of life in patients surgically treated for penile cancer: Impact of aggressiveness in surgery.

Roman Sosnowski1, Jan Karol Wolski2, Marta Kulpa3, Urszula Ziętalewicz4, Mariola Kosowicz5, Tomasz Kalinowski6, Tomasz Demkow7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluations are being increasingly used for clinical assessment of cancer treatment outcomes. For a patient, not only is life expectancy important, but also a general sense of sustained global health. Intuitively, the more disfiguring the treatment, the more pronounced could be the deterioration in the QoL. We aimed to compare various aspects of QoL in three groups of patients surgically treated for penile cancer by local excision, partial penectomy, or total penectomy.
METHODS: HRQoL was assessed in 51 patients surgically treated for penile cancer. Total penectomy, partial penectomy, or wide local excision was performed in 11, 27, and 13 patients, respectively. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was used for HRQoL assessment. Relations between the patients and their partners were also assessed.
RESULTS: Statistically significant negative correlation was found between aggressiveness of the surgical procedure and both, assessment of global health status (p = 0.04) and physical functioning (p = 0.047). The more aggressive the surgery, the lower was the patients' assessment of their QoL. Among the patients who maintained their partner relations postsurgery, 58.9% declared that their relations postoperatively were not inferior compared to those preoperatively. There was no statistically significant effect of the surgery type on relations with female partners (p = 0.619).
CONCLUSION: The magnitude of disfigurement caused by surgical treatment of penile cancer had a significant impact on the selected QoL domains assessed by the EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire. There was no correlation between the scope of surgical intervention and partner relations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-related quality of life (HRQoL); Partner relations; Penectomy; Penis; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29173821     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  6 in total

1.  Global outcomes and lessons learned in the management of Fournier's gangrene from high-volume centres: findings from a literature review over the last two decades.

Authors:  Daniel Bowen; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; B K Somani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 2.  What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakalis; Riccardo Campi; Lenka Barreto; Herney Garcia Perdomo; Isabella Greco; Łukasz Zapala; Mithun Kailavasan; Tiago Antunes-Lopes; Jack David Marcus; Kenneth Manzie; John Osborne; Benjamin Ayres; Luc M F Moonen; Andrea Necchi; Juanita Crook; Pedro Oliveira; Lance C Pagliaro; Chris Protzel; Arie S Parnham; Maarten Albersen; Curtis A Pettaway; Philippe E Spiess; Scott T Tagawa; R Bryan Rumble; Oscar R Brouwer
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Local Tumor Treatment in Penile Cancer: Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study Group Survey (E-PROPS).

Authors:  Maximilian Pallauf; Marie C Hempel; Marie C Hupe; Matthias May; Marlene Haccius; Dorothea Weckermann; Steffen Lebentrau; Bernd Hoschke; Ulrike Necknig; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Lukas Manka; Philipp Nuhn; Peter Törzsök; Lukas Lusuardi; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  The role of penectomy in penile cancer-evolving paradigms.

Authors:  Sarah O'Neill; Mitchell Barns; Filip Vujovic; Mikhail Lozinskiy
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

5.  Impact of radiation therapy on perineal urethrostomy for penile cancer.

Authors:  Peter A S Johnstone; Hielke M de Vries; Juan Chipollini; G Daniel Grass; Franklin Boyd; Fernando Korkes; Maarten Albersen; Eduard Roussel; Yao Zhu; Ding-Wei Ye; Viraj Master; Thien-Linh Le; Asif Muneer; Oscar R Brouwer; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-09

6.  Effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eleanor Whyte; Alexandra Sutcliffe; Philip Keegan; Tom Clifford; Jamie Matu; Oliver M Shannon; Alex Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.