Literature DB >> 29173604

The Impact of Burst Exercise on Cardiometabolic Status of Patients Newly Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes.

Avinash Pandey1, Neville Suskin2, Paul Poirier3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of burst high-intensity exercise on physiological, cardiometabolic, and biochemical variables compared with traditional moderate-intensity continuous exercise training (MICT) has yet to be assessed in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We compared the impact of multiple short-duration, high-intensity burst exercise sessions to MICT on cardiometabolic variables in patients with T2D.
METHODS: Forty newly diagnosed patients with T2D not receiving lipid lowering or hypoglycemic medications were randomized to 40 minutes of MICT (60% of maximal heart rate) 5 days per week or 3 continuous bursts of 12 minutes of high-intensity exercise (85% of maximal heart rate) 5 days per week for 3 months. Body mass index, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), and lipid profile were assessed before and after 3 months of exercise training.
RESULTS: Burst exercise resulted in greater body mass index reduction than did MICT (-2.1 ± 1.2 kg/m2 vs -0.7 ± 0.7 kg/m2, respectively; P < 0.05). There was a greater reduction at 3 months (P < 0.05) in HbA1C levels in the burst exercise group (8.14% ± 0.49% to 7.32% ± 0.39%) compared with the MICT group (8.18% ± 0.35% to 7.94% ± 0.41%). Compared with MICT, burst exercise was associated with a greater reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-11 vs -4%; P < 0.05) and a greater increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (22% vs 3%; all P < 0.05). After 3 months, patients in the burst exercise group attained greater exercise time on the treadmill (exercise capacity) than did those prescribed MICT (6.87 ± 1.44 minutes vs 5.40 ± 1.96 minutes; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the current study support better cardiometabolic benefits of burst exercise compared with MICT over 3 months in patients with newly diagnosed T2D.
Copyright © 2017 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29173604     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  4 in total

1.  Predictors of adherence to prescribed exercise programs for older adults with medical or surgical indications for exercise: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia F Shaw; Sophie Pilon; Matthieu Vierula; Daniel I McIsaac
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 2.  HIIT is not superior to MICT in altering blood lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gina Wood; Anna Murrell; Tom van der Touw; Neil Smart
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 3.  High-Intensity Interval Training in Older Adults: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Catherine F S Marriott; Andrea F M Petrella; Emily C S Marriott; Narlon C Boa Sorte Silva; Robert J Petrella
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-07-19

4.  Glycemic Threshold as an Alternative Method to Identify the Anaerobic Threshold in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Delevatti; Ana Carolina Kanitz; Cristine L Alberton; Elisa Corrêa Marson; Patricia Dias Pantoja; Carolina DertzbocherFeil Pinho; Salime Chedid Lisboa; Luiz Fernando M Kruel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.