Literature DB >> 29173459

Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part I: A conceptual model.

R M Morgan1.   

Abstract

There has been a call for forensic science to actively return to the approach of scientific endeavour. The importance of incorporating an awareness of the requirements of the law in its broadest sense, and embedding research into both practice and policy within forensic science, is arguably critical to achieving such an endeavour. This paper presents a conceptual model (FoRTE) that outlines the holistic nature of trace evidence in the 'endeavour' of forensic reconstruction. This model offers insights into the different components intrinsic to transparent, reproducible and robust reconstructions in forensic science. The importance of situating evidence within the whole forensic science process (from crime scene to court), of developing evidence bases to underpin each stage, of frameworks that offer insights to the interaction of different lines of evidence, and the role of expertise in decision making are presented and their interactions identified. It is argued that such a conceptual model has value in identifying the future steps for harnessing the value of trace evidence in forensic reconstruction. It also highlights that there is a need to develop a nuanced approach to reconstructions that incorporates both empirical evidence bases and expertise. A conceptual understanding has the potential to ensure that the endeavour of forensic reconstruction has its roots in 'problem-solving' science, and can offer transparency and clarity in the conclusions and inferences drawn from trace evidence, thereby enabling the value of trace evidence to be realised in investigations and the courts.
Copyright © 2017 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Conceptual model; Forensic reconstruction; Forensic science; Interpretation; Trace evidence

Year:  2017        PMID: 29173459     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  5 in total

1.  A crisis for the future of forensic science: Lessons from the UK of the importance of epistemology for funding research and development.

Authors:  R M Morgan; E A Levin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2019-09-13

2.  Forensic science. The importance of identity in theory and practice.

Authors:  R M Morgan
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2019-09-13

3.  A survey of case studies on the use of forensic three-dimensional printing in England and Wales.

Authors:  D Errickson; R M Carew; A J Collings; M J P Biggs; P Haig; H O'Hora; N Marsh; J Roberts
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.791

4.  Increasing the accessibility and impact of justice-related student and practitioner research.

Authors:  Rachel S Bolton-King; Helen Kara; John P Cassella; Brian W J Rankin; Ruth M Morgan; Siobhan Burke; Dom Fripp; John P Kaye
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials.

Authors:  Emma A Levin; Ruth M Morgan; Lewis D Griffin; Vivienne J Jones
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.832

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.