Literature DB >> 29173070

Generalist versus Subspecialist Characteristics of the U.S. Radiologist Workforce.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Wenyi Wang1, Danny R Hughes1, Richard Duszak1.   

Abstract

Purpose To assess subspecialty practice characteristics of the U.S. radiologist workforce. Materials and Methods This study used the Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File and did not constitute human subject research. The authors identified 33 090 radiologists who billed for professional services between 2012 and 2014 and used a validated classification system to map services to seven subspecialties and quantify subspecialty-focused effort on the basis of work relative value units (RVUs). Radiologists with more than half of their billed work RVUs in a single subspecialty were designated subspecialists; the remainder were classified as generalists. Matching radiologists with various characteristics extracted from other publicly available data sets, associations were explored through use of analysis of variance and multivariable logistic regression. Results More than half (55.3%) of U.S. radiologists practice predominantly as generalists but dedicate on average 36.0% effort to one subspecialty. Among radiologists practicing as majority subspecialists, neuroradiologists (10.1% of all radiologists) and breast imagers (8.4%) are most common. Subspecialization is more common (P < .001) among radiologists who are female, are earlier in their career, work in larger practices, have academic affiliations, and practice in the Northeast. By subspecialty, female representation varies from 8.6% (interventional radiology) to 63.1% (breast imaging); cardiothoracic imagers were more commonly early career radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians were later career radiologists. Subspecialization is considerably more common in larger (≥100 members) practices (63.1%). An academic affiliation is the strongest independent predictor of subspecialization (odds ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval: 3.30, 3.84). Conclusion Despite an increased focus on radiology subspecialization, most U.S. radiologists are majority general radiologists on the basis of their work RVUs. Subspecialization is by far more prevalent in larger and academic practices. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29173070     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017171684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Representation of women among leadership and honorees within the Society of Abdominal Radiology, past and present.

Authors:  Kerry L Thomas; Hanna Zafar; Puja Parikh; Elena Korngold; Cheri L Canon; Elizabeth Sadowski
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01-16

2.  Evaluation of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a generic assessment tool developed through the Delphi method.

Authors:  Niklas Kahr Rasmussen; Leizl Joy Nayahangan; Jonathan Carlsen; Olle Ekberg; Knut Brabrand; Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quality Assurance of a Cross-Border and Sub-Specialized Teleradiology Service.

Authors:  Szabolcs Hetenyi; Leonie Goelz; Alexander Boehmcker; Carlos Schorlemmer
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28

4.  Subspecialized radiology reporting: productivity and impact on the turnaround times for radiology reports in a middle-income country.

Authors:  Nupur Verma; Gabriel Sartori Pacini; Juliana Pastorino Torrada; Diogo Martins de Oliveira; Matheus Zanon; Edson Marchiori; Tan-Lucien Mohammed; Bruno Hochhegger
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug

5.  Am I Ready to Be an Independent Neuroradiologist? Objective Trends in Neuroradiology Fellows' Performance during the Fellowship Year.

Authors:  J H Masur; J E Schmitt; D Lalevic; T S Cook; L J Bagley; S Mohan; A P Nayate
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Association of volume of self-directed versus assigned interpretive work with diagnostic performance of radiologists: an observational study.

Authors:  Shiori Amemiya; Harushi Mori; Hidemasa Takao; Osamu Abe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Comparing Breast and Abdominal Subspecialists' Follow-Up Recommendations for Incidental Liver Lesions on Breast MRI.

Authors:  Pamela J DiPiro; David P Alper; Catherine S Giess; Daniel I Glazer; Leslie K Lee; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.532

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.