Eric Abella Roth1, Zishan Cui2, Ashleigh Rich2, Nathan Lachowsky2,3, Paul Sereda2, Kiffer Card2,4, David Moore2,5, Robert Hogg2,6. 1. a Department of Anthropology and Centre for Addiction Research of British Columbia , University of Victoria , Victoria , British Columbia , Canada. 2. b British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada. 3. c School of Public Health and Social Policy, Faculty of Human and Social Development , University of Victoria , Victoria , British Columbia , Canada. 4. d Faculty of Health Sciences , Simon Fraser University , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada. 5. e School of Medicine , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada. 6. f Faculty of Health Sciences , Simon Fraser University , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study analyzed repeated study visits (n = 2,624) of 693 gay and bisexual men (GBM) in the Momentum Health Study from July, 2012 to June, 2015. Based on recent cross-sectional analyses, we hypothesized that over the study period: (1) hazardous drinking levels would remain high, (2) GBM classified as Hazardous Drinkers will be consistently associated with high risk sex, and (3) GBM classified as Always Hazardous Drinkers differ significantly from Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers. METHODS: AUDIT classified participants as Non-Hazardous Drinkers or Hazardous Drinkers, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test assessed hazardous drinking trends, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analysis identified Hazardous Drinking covariates. Logistic regression analysis of participants with at least two study visits (575) compared those who were Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers (n = 171) with Always Hazardous Drinkers (n = 129). RESULTS: At baseline 40% of participants were Hazardous Drinkers, but there was a significant decline in hazardous drinking by visit and Hazardous Drinkers were not significantly associated with high risk sex. Always Hazardous Drinkers had significantly more high risk sex and gay bar attendance, but less often sought Internet sex partners compared to Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses did not support the first two hypotheses, but distinguishing between Always and Sometimes Hazardous drinkers identified a young GBM subgroup associated with significantly higher levels of high risk sex and social support measures. These results suggest interventions programs based on Social Norms Theory, which predicts peer norms among youth are important factors in regulating drinking patterns, may be effective for these men.
BACKGROUND: This study analyzed repeated study visits (n = 2,624) of 693 gay and bisexual men (GBM) in the Momentum Health Study from July, 2012 to June, 2015. Based on recent cross-sectional analyses, we hypothesized that over the study period: (1) hazardous drinking levels would remain high, (2) GBM classified as Hazardous Drinkers will be consistently associated with high risk sex, and (3) GBM classified as Always Hazardous Drinkers differ significantly from Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers. METHODS: AUDIT classified participants as Non-Hazardous Drinkers or Hazardous Drinkers, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test assessed hazardous drinking trends, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analysis identified Hazardous Drinking covariates. Logistic regression analysis of participants with at least two study visits (575) compared those who were Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers (n = 171) with Always Hazardous Drinkers (n = 129). RESULTS: At baseline 40% of participants were Hazardous Drinkers, but there was a significant decline in hazardous drinking by visit and Hazardous Drinkers were not significantly associated with high risk sex. Always Hazardous Drinkers had significantly more high risk sex and gay bar attendance, but less often sought Internet sex partners compared to Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses did not support the first two hypotheses, but distinguishing between Always and Sometimes Hazardous drinkers identified a young GBM subgroup associated with significantly higher levels of high risk sex and social support measures. These results suggest interventions programs based on Social Norms Theory, which predicts peer norms among youth are important factors in regulating drinking patterns, may be effective for these men.
Authors: Tyler B Wray; Benjamin Grin; Leah Dorfman; Tiffany R Glynn; Christopher W Kahler; Brandon D L Marshall; Jacob J van den Berg; Nickolas D Zaller; Kendall J Bryant; Don Operario Journal: Drug Alcohol Rev Date: 2015-04-13
Authors: Viviane D Lima; Josie Geller; David R Bangsberg; Thomas L Patterson; Mark Daniel; Thomas Kerr; Julio S G Montaner; Robert S Hogg Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 4.177