Literature DB >> 2917281

Abnormal spatial patterns of elbow muscle activation in hemiparetic human subjects.

D Bourbonnais1, S Vanden Noven, K M Carey, W Z Rymer.   

Abstract

The patterns of electromyographic (EMG) activity in spastic-paretic and contralateral elbow muscles of 10 hemiparetic human subjects were compared during a sequence of graded voluntary isometric contractions against 4 different-sized loads. These loads were orientated successively at 8 different angles over a 360 degree range, referenced to a plane at the wrist orthogonal to the long axis of the forearm. Comparisons of EMG activity recorded from normal and paretic limbs revealed that there were marked differences in the torque angles which evoked significant EMG activity, in the angular range of EMG, in the angle of peak EMG, and in the scaling of EMG magnitude with increasing isometric loads. In severely impaired limbs, there was a marked shift in both the peak EMG angle and the angular domain of EMG activity for both biceps and triceps muscle groups, away from the normal elbow flexion-extension axis towards external humeral rotation and shoulder girdle elevation. The extent of the disturbance in the spatial patterns of EMG activity was closely correlated with the clinical severity of the spastic-paretic disability, which was quantified using a functional scale patterned after that described by Fugl Meyer et al. (1975). The observed patterns of EMG activity in paretic flexor muscles do not conform with established synergistic patterns, such as might be released by excitation of the flexor reflex in a normal limb. Possible origins for the anomalous EMG patterns are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2917281     DOI: 10.1093/brain/112.1.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  25 in total

1.  Usage of the ACT Robot in a Brain Machine Interface for Hand Opening and Closing in Stroke Survivors.

Authors:  Jun Yao; Clay Sheaff; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2008-01-14

Review 2.  Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury.

Authors:  P H McCrea; J J Eng; A J Hodgson
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Saturated muscle activation contributes to compensatory reaching strategies after stroke.

Authors:  Patrick H McCrea; Janice J Eng; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Static dynamometer for the measurement of multidirectional forces exerted by the thumb.

Authors:  D Bourbonnais; P Duval
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: a framework for understanding muscle coordination of posture.

Authors:  Lena H Ting
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Evaluation of lower limb cross planar kinetic connectivity signatures post-stroke.

Authors:  Andrew Q Tan; Yasin Y Dhaher
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Strength Training in Individuals with Stroke.

Authors:  Janice J Eng
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Impact of gravity loading on post-stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness.

Authors:  Randall F Beer; Michael D Ellis; Bradley G Holubar; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms.

Authors:  Saandeep Mani; Pratik K Mutha; Andrzej Przybyla; Kathleen Y Haaland; David C Good; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.