Midori Sasaki Yatabe1, Junichi Yatabe1,2, Kei Asayama2,3, Jan A Staessen4, Blerim Mujaj4, Lutgarde Thijs4, Kyotaro Ito5, Tomohiro Sonoo5, Satoshi Morimoto1, Atsuhiro Ichihara1. 1. a Department of Medicine II, Endocrinology and Hypertension , Tokyo Women's Medical University , Tokyo , Japan. 2. b Tohoku Institute for Management of Blood Pressure , Sendai , Japan. 3. c Department of Hygiene and Public Health , Teikyo University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan. 4. d KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Studies Coordinating Centre , Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, University of Leuven , Leuven , Belgium. 5. e Division of Medical Research , PORT incorporation , Tokyo , Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although self-measurement of home blood pressure (HBP) is common in Japan and HBP telemonitoring via the Internet is possible, whether telemonitoring improves HBP control better than conventional practice remains unclear. Furthermore, hypertension care with online communication using telemonitored HBP is feasible, whereas the efficacy and safety of such telemedicine have not been established. We aim to compare traditional care, care with office visits using HBP telemonitoring, and antihypertensive telemedicine based on HBP telemonitoring. METHODS AND DESIGN: In total, 444 patients with uncontrolled hypertension will be recruited and randomly assigned to three groups: (1) control: usual care with office visits and HBP self-report, (2) telemonitoring: weekly assessment of transmitted HBP by physicians and treatment adjustment upon office visits, or (3) telemedicine: online communication instead of office visits to adjust medication using telemonitored HBP. Primary outcome is the time to control of HBP, and secondary outcomes include achieved HBP levels, adherence, treatment intensity, adverse events, patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Hypertension care with telemonitoring and telemedicine are expected to require shorter time to achieve HBP control compared to usual care. Combining HBP telemonitoring with telemedicine may lower the hurdles for starting and persisting to hypertension treatment and eventually reduce cardiovascular events.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Although self-measurement of home blood pressure (HBP) is common in Japan and HBP telemonitoring via the Internet is possible, whether telemonitoring improves HBP control better than conventional practice remains unclear. Furthermore, hypertension care with online communication using telemonitored HBP is feasible, whereas the efficacy and safety of such telemedicine have not been established. We aim to compare traditional care, care with office visits using HBP telemonitoring, and antihypertensive telemedicine based on HBP telemonitoring. METHODS AND DESIGN: In total, 444 patients with uncontrolled hypertension will be recruited and randomly assigned to three groups: (1) control: usual care with office visits and HBP self-report, (2) telemonitoring: weekly assessment of transmitted HBP by physicians and treatment adjustment upon office visits, or (3) telemedicine: online communication instead of office visits to adjust medication using telemonitored HBP. Primary outcome is the time to control of HBP, and secondary outcomes include achieved HBP levels, adherence, treatment intensity, adverse events, patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Hypertension care with telemonitoring and telemedicine are expected to require shorter time to achieve HBP control compared to usual care. Combining HBP telemonitoring with telemedicine may lower the hurdles for starting and persisting to hypertension treatment and eventually reduce cardiovascular events.
Entities:
Keywords:
Home blood pressure; eHealth; mHealth; telemonitoring