| Literature DB >> 29172296 |
Kaori Okayama1, Mitsuaki Okodo, Hiroshi Kitamura, Ichiro Itoda.
Abstract
Purpose: The incidence of invasive anal cancer (IAC) has been increasing among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). Although cytological diagnosis is the modality of choice for screening cases of IAC, it is associated with lower sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate new cytological signs of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection that may contribute to improving anal cytology.Entities:
Keywords: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); human papillomavirus (HPV); MSM; anal cytology; HRA
Year: 2017 PMID: 29172296 PMCID: PMC5773808 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.11.3173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
The Cellularity Values, Number of Dysplastic Squamous Cells and Cytological Signs of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection in the Anal Pap Smears of All 37 Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)
| Cytological signs of HPV infection | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case No. | High-risk HPV infection | Cytology | Cellularity (nsc/hpf) | Dysplastic squamous cells (dsc/smear) | Cells (hpv/smear) | Koilo | Koiloid | APK cells | bin (+) | bin (−) | Multi |
| 1 | + | UN | 0.3 | ND | ND | ||||||
| 2 | - | UN | 1.3 | ND | ND | ||||||
| 3 | - | NILM | 11 | ND | 2 | + | |||||
| 4 | - | NILM | 11.5 | ND | 0 | ||||||
| 5 | + | NILM | 7.5 | ND | 0 | ||||||
| 6 | + | NILM | 11.5 | ND | 2 | + | |||||
| 7 | - | NILM | 14 | ND | 0 | ||||||
| 8 | - | NILM | 17.5 | ND | 0 | ||||||
| 9 | + | ASC-US | 52 | ND | 0 | ||||||
| 10 | + | ASC-US | 12 | ND | 2 | + | + | ||||
| 11 | + | ASC-US | 18 | ND | 4 | + | + | ||||
| 12 | + | LSIL | 11 | 3 | 5 | + | |||||
| 13 | + | LSIL | 33 | 18 | 6 | + | + | + | |||
| 14 | + | LSIL | 12 | 5 | 2 | + | |||||
| 15 | + | LSIL | 10.5 | 18 | 19 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 16 | + | LSIL | 70.5 | 18 | 62 | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 17 | + | LSIL | 12 | 31 | 24 | + | + | + | |||
| 18 | - | LSIL | 40.5 | 20 | 2 | + | |||||
| 19 | + | LSIL | 10 | 5 | 9 | + | + | ||||
| 20 | + | LSIL | 15 | 10 | 16 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 21 | + | LSIL | 31.5 | 7 | 18 | + | + | ||||
| 22 | + | LSIL | 57.5 | 9 | 9 | + | + | + | |||
| 23 | + | LSIL | 27.5 | 8 | 8 | + | + | + | |||
| 24 | + | LSIL | 3 | 29 | 43 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 25 | + | LSIL | 31.5 | 21 | 19 | + | + | + | |||
| 26 | + | LSIL | 10 | 31 | 16 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 27 | + | LSIL | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | + | |||||
| 28 | + | LSIL | 2 | 2 | 2 | + | |||||
| 29 | + | HSIL | 24.5 | 13 | 2 | + | |||||
| 30 | + | HSIL | 8.5 | 17 | 25 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 31 | + | HSIL | 25.5 | 10 | 10 | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 32 | + | HSIL | 23.5 | 24 | 71 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 33 | + | HSIL | 48 | 34 | 9 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 34 | + | HSIL | 19.5 | 2 | 25 | + | + | ||||
| 35 | + | HSIL | 2.5 | 15 | 8 | + | + | + | |||
| 36 | + | HSIL | 2 | 12 | 18 | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 37 | + | HSIL | 20 | 152 | 12 | + | + | + | |||
HPV, human papillomavirus;UN, undiagnosable;ND, not detected;NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy;SIL, squamous intraepithelial lesion;ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance;LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion;HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion;Koilo, Koilocytes;Koiloid, Koilocytoids;APK cells, atypical parakeratotic cells;bin (+), compression-positive binucleated cells;bin (−), compression-negative binucleated cells;Multi, Multinucleated cells
Figure 1Six Cytological Signs of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection. Pap staining (40×) : (A) koilocite, (B) koilocytoid, (C) atypical parakeratotic cells (APK), (D) compression-positive binucleated cell, (E) compression-negative binucleated cell, and (F) multinucleated cell.