BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) will have been the second leading cancer-related death in the United States by 2020, according to current estimation. Its late manifestation and the lack of good early detection methods are the cause of extremely low survival rates. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop highly sensitive and specific marker. GDF-15, a member of TGFbeta family, has recently emerged as a protein playing an important role in carcinogenesis of various neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the potential of GDF-15, IL-17, IL-23 serum concentration, and the panel of PDAC markers in differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients operated on due to pancreatobiliary lesions were enrolled in this study. Levels of CEA, CA125 and Ca19-9 were assessed using standard laboratory protocols. A sample of serum was collected prior to the surgery via central line. Levels of GDF-15, Il-17, Il-23 were measured using a ELISA kit. After standard pathological examination of specimens obtained on surgery, patients were divided into 2 groups: 42 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 21 patients with focal chronic pancreatitis. RESULTS: Mean GDF-15 concentration in patients with CP vs PDAC was 2247.95 (± 179.27) vs 7694.58 (± 1878.94) [pg/mL] respectively (p= 0.011). Mean concentration of Il-17, Il-23, Ca19-9, Ca125, Ca15-3, CEA in patients with CP and PDAC was 862.36 (± 30.84) vs 841.83 (± 33.94) p= 0.833; 127.85 (± 5.87) vs 127.51 (± 9.74) p= 0.175; 34.95 (± 23.34) vs 266.62 (± 49.7) p= 0.001; 13.4 (± 1.6) vs 39.27 (± 6.85) p= 0.005; 18.4 (± 1.48) vs 20.2 (± 1.38) p= 0.416; 1.96 (± 0.38) vs 5.93 (± 1.74) p= 0.004 respectively. In order to compare these markers with the routinely used ones, ROC curve was built. CA19-9 with clinically used cut-off point of ⩾ 36 IU/mL has specificity of 90.5% and sensitivity of 57.14%. At the same time GDF-15 with the optimal cut-off point of 2.7 ng/mL has specificity of 76.19% and sensitivity of 73.8%. Although in our research group CA19-9 has an excellent specificity, its usefulness is hampered by its low sensitivity. On the other hand, GDF-15 parameters are well-balanced making it a more useful biomarker of PDAC. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, GDF-15 is more accurate than Ca19-9 in differentiating pancreatic mass due to chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Interleukin 17 and 23 cannot be considered as PDAC biomarkers. GDF-15 concentration in serum should be further investigated in order to assess their usefulness in pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) will have been the second leading cancer-related death in the United States by 2020, according to current estimation. Its late manifestation and the lack of good early detection methods are the cause of extremely low survival rates. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop highly sensitive and specific marker. GDF-15, a member of TGFbeta family, has recently emerged as a protein playing an important role in carcinogenesis of various neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the potential of GDF-15, IL-17, IL-23 serum concentration, and the panel of PDAC markers in differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients operated on due to pancreatobiliary lesions were enrolled in this study. Levels of CEA, CA125 and Ca19-9 were assessed using standard laboratory protocols. A sample of serum was collected prior to the surgery via central line. Levels of GDF-15, Il-17, Il-23 were measured using a ELISA kit. After standard pathological examination of specimens obtained on surgery, patients were divided into 2 groups: 42 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 21 patients with focal chronic pancreatitis. RESULTS: Mean GDF-15 concentration in patients with CP vs PDAC was 2247.95 (± 179.27) vs 7694.58 (± 1878.94) [pg/mL] respectively (p= 0.011). Mean concentration of Il-17, Il-23, Ca19-9, Ca125, Ca15-3, CEA in patients with CP and PDAC was 862.36 (± 30.84) vs 841.83 (± 33.94) p= 0.833; 127.85 (± 5.87) vs 127.51 (± 9.74) p= 0.175; 34.95 (± 23.34) vs 266.62 (± 49.7) p= 0.001; 13.4 (± 1.6) vs 39.27 (± 6.85) p= 0.005; 18.4 (± 1.48) vs 20.2 (± 1.38) p= 0.416; 1.96 (± 0.38) vs 5.93 (± 1.74) p= 0.004 respectively. In order to compare these markers with the routinely used ones, ROC curve was built. CA19-9 with clinically used cut-off point of ⩾ 36 IU/mL has specificity of 90.5% and sensitivity of 57.14%. At the same time GDF-15 with the optimal cut-off point of 2.7 ng/mL has specificity of 76.19% and sensitivity of 73.8%. Although in our research group CA19-9 has an excellent specificity, its usefulness is hampered by its low sensitivity. On the other hand, GDF-15 parameters are well-balanced making it a more useful biomarker of PDAC. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, GDF-15 is more accurate than Ca19-9 in differentiating pancreatic mass due to chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Interleukin 17 and 23 cannot be considered as PDAC biomarkers. GDF-15 concentration in serum should be further investigated in order to assess their usefulness in pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
CEA; Ca125; Ca15-3; Ca19-9; GDF-15; Il-17; Il-23; Pancreatic cancer; cancer biomarker; focal chronic pancreatitis; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; panel of biomarkers
Authors: Yang Song; Ming Yang; Hongjian Zhang; Yan Sun; Ye Tao; Huihui Li; Jing Zhang; Yuncheng Li; Jianming Yang Journal: J Immunol Res Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 4.818