Literature DB >> 29171789

Accuracy of identification of low or high risk lifting during standardised lifting situations.

Mikkel Brandt1,2, Pascal Madeleine2, Afshin Samani2, Markus Due Jakobsen1, Sebastian Skals1, Jonas Vinstrup1,2, Lars Louis Andersen1,2.   

Abstract

The aim was to classify lifting activities into low and high risk categories (according to The Danish Working Environment Authority guidelines) based on surface electromyography (sEMG) and trunk inclination (tri-axial accelerometer) measurements. Lifting tasks with different weights, horizontal distance and technique were performed. The lifting tasks were characterised by a feature vector composed of either the 90th, 95th or 99th percentile of sEMG activity level and trunk inclinations during the task. Linear Discriminant Analysis and a subject-specific threshold scheme were applied and lifting tasks were classified with an accuracy of 65.1-65.5%. When lifts were classified based on the subject-specific threshold scheme from low and upper back accelerometers, the accuracy reached 52.1-58.1% and 72.7-78.1%, respectively. In conclusion, the use of subject-specific thresholds from sEMG from upper trapezius and erector spinae as well as inclination of the upper trunk enabled us to identify low and high risk lifts with an acceptable accuracy. Practitioner Summary: This study contributes to the development of a method enabling the automatic detection of high risk lifting tasks, i.e. exposure to high biomechanical loads, based on individual sEMG and kinematics from an entire working day. These methods may be more cost-effective and may complement observations commonly used by practitioners.

Keywords:  Working environment; low back pain; musculoskeletal disorders; musculoskeletal pain; occupational injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29171789     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1408857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Using passive or active back-support exoskeletons during a repetitive lifting task: influence on cardiorespiratory parameters.

Authors:  M Schwartz; K Desbrosses; J Theurel; G Mornieux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Characterizing Human Box-Lifting Behavior Using Wearable Inertial Motion Sensors.

Authors:  Steven D Hlucny; Domen Novak
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranavolo Alberto; Francesco Draicchio; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alessio Silvetti; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Effects of a Participatory Ergonomics Intervention With Wearable Technical Measurements of Physical Workload in the Construction Industry: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mikkel Brandt; Pascal Madeleine; Afshin Samani; Jeppe Zn Ajslev; Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  A Practical Sensor-Based Methodology for the Quantitative Assessment and Classification of Chronic Non Specific Low Back Patients (NSLBP) in Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Mehrdad Davoudi; Seyyed Mohammadreza Shokouhyan; Mohsen Abedi; Narges Meftahi; Atefeh Rahimi; Ehsan Rashedi; Maryam Hoviattalab; Roya Narimani; Mohamad Parnianpour; Kinda Khalaf
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Load Position and Weight Classification during Carrying Gait Using Wearable Inertial and Electromyographic Sensors.

Authors:  Maja Goršič; Boyi Dai; Domen Novak
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  People With Low Back Pain Display a Different Distribution of Erector Spinae Activity During a Singular Mono-Planar Lifting Task.

Authors:  Andy Sanderson; Corrado Cescon; Nicola R Heneghan; Pauline Kuithan; Eduardo Martinez-Valdes; Alison Rushton; Marco Barbero; Deborah Falla
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-12-20

8.  Work-Related Risk Assessment According to the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: A Preliminary Study Using a Wearable Inertial Sensor and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Leandro Donisi; Giuseppe Cesarelli; Armando Coccia; Monica Panigazzi; Edda Maria Capodaglio; Giovanni D'Addio
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.