Literature DB >> 2917134

A prospective comparison of four techniques for measuring platelet-associated IgG.

J G Kelton1, W G Murphy, A Lucarelli, J Garvey-Williams, A Santos, R Meyer, P Powers.   

Abstract

We describe a prospective study comparing four different assays for PAIgG. Platelets from patients with a variety of thrombocytopenic disorders were collected into ACD, washed, and the PAIgG then measured using three assays for surface PAIgG. These included: (a) a direct binding assay using 125I-monoclonal anti-IgG (MoAb); (b) a direct binding assay using 125I-staphylococcal protein A (SPA); and (c) a two-stage assay. PAIgG also was measured using an assay for 'total' PAIgG following platelet lysis. The mean +/- SD number of molecules of IgG per platelet on washed platelets from 29 healthy, non-thrombocytopenic controls was: 86 +/- 80 (125I-MoAb); 94 +/- 96 (125I-SPA); 3520 +/- 1890 (two-stage surface assay); and 10,850 +/- 3720 (total PAIgG). A total of 62 different patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura or thrombocytopenia complicating systematic lupus erythematosus, and 73 different patients with 'non-immune' thrombocytopenia, were tested using each of the four assays. These 'non-immune' thrombocytopenic patients included patients with carcinoma, septicaemia, pre-eclampsia, chronic leukaemia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, haemolytic uraemic syndrome, acute leukaemia and myelodysplasia. All four assays gave similar results for both the immune and non-immune thrombocytopenic patients. The sensitivity of the assays for the most severely thrombocytopenic patients with immune thrombocytopenia was: MoAb 60%; SPA 88%; two-stage 82%; and 'total' PAIgG 88%. The specificity of the four assays in the non-immune thrombocytopenic patients was 57% 'total' PAIgG; 63% two-stage surface; 25% SPA; 38% MoAb.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2917134     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1989.tb06281.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  T E Warkentin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Anti-platelet autoantibodies from ITP patients recognize an epitope in GPIIb/IIIa deduced by complementary hydropathy.

Authors:  S J De Souza; J Sabbaga; E D'Amico; R Pasqualini; R Brentani
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Laboratory investigation of immune thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  M Warner; J G Kelton
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  How do we diagnose immune thrombocytopenia in 2018?

Authors:  John G Kelton; John R Vrbensky; Donald M Arnold
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

5.  Recommendations for the implementation of platelet autoantibody testing in clinical trials of immune thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  D M Arnold; S Santoso; A Greinacher
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Detection of platelet-associated antibodies by flow cytometry in hematological autoimmune disorders.

Authors:  P L Tazzari; F Ricci; N Vianelli; C Tassi; D Belletti; I Pierri; L Gugliotta; M Gobbi; R Conte
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  Anti-platelet antibody immunoassays in childhood immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Schmidt; Anke J Lakerveld; Katja M J Heitink-Pollé; Marrie C A Bruin; Gestur Vidarsson; Leendert Porcelijn; Masja de Haas
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.144

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.