Literature DB >> 2917111

Defining a standard intubating position using "angle finder".

W A Horton1, L Fahy, P Charters.   

Abstract

Study of patients who exhibit only limited morphological abnormality yet present difficulty with direct laryngoscopy is facilitated by a standard intubating position. The "Angle Finder" instrument allows implementation of a simple reproducible geometric standard which is applied easily in formal research work and in clinical practice and teaching. The proposed standard relates to the curved (Macintosh) laryngoscope blade and a supine patient. The lower neck flexion is 35 degrees and extension of the plane of the face 15 degrees, each angle measured relative to horizontal. Initially, the standard was derived from a review of the literature, then validated in a study of the intubating practices of 10 senior anaesthetists. A more detailed study of 10 normal volunteers confirmed reproducibility and, for nine patients with a history of difficult direct laryngoscopy, the standard was shown to be appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2917111     DOI: 10.1093/bja/62.1.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  22 in total

1.  A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Park; Hee-Pyoung Park; Young-Tae Jeon; Jung-Won Hwang; Jin-Hee Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Effect of head elevation on passive upper airway collapsibility in normal subjects during propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Masato Kobayashi; Takao Ayuse; Yuko Hoshino; Shinji Kurata; Shunji Moromugi; Hartmut Schneider; Jason P Kirkness; Alan R Schwartz; Kumiko Oi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Ramped Position vs Sniffing Position During Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; David R Janz; Derek W Russell; Jonathan D Casey; Robert J Lentz; Aline N Zouk; Bennett P deBoisblanc; Jairo I Santanilla; Yasin A Khan; Aaron M Joffe; William S Stigler; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  An analysis of laryngoscope blade shape and design: new criteria for laryngoscope evaluation.

Authors:  R R Marks; R Hancock; P Charters
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Tracheal intubation and laryngoscope design.

Authors:  J W McIntyre
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Analysis of mathematical model for osseous factors in difficult intubation.

Authors:  P Charters
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Difficult laryngoscopy: obtaining the best view.

Authors:  J L Benumof
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Chest anteroposterior diameter affects difficulty of laryngoscopy for non-morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Ji-Won Choi; Jie-Ae Kim; Hae-Kyoung Kim; Min-Seok Oh; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients.

Authors:  D K Rose; M M Cohen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Development of an Endotracheal Intubation Formative Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Adam Ryason; Emil R Petrusa; Uwe Kruger; Zhaohui Xia; Vanessa T Wong; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De; Stephanie B Jones
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2020-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.