| Literature DB >> 29170681 |
E L Pufall1, J W Eaton1, L Robertson1, P Mushati2, C Nyamukapa1,2, S Gregson1.
Abstract
There is a growing interest in education as a means to reduce HIV infection in vulnerable children in sub-Saharan Africa; however, the mechanisms by which education reduces HIV infection remain uncertain. Substance use has been associated with high-risk sexual behaviour and could lie on the causal pathway between education and HIV risk. Therefore, we used multivariable regression to measure associations between: (i) orphanhood and substance use (alcohol, recreational drugs, and smoking), (ii) substance use and sexual risk behaviours, and (iii) school enrolment and substance use, in adolescents aged 15-19 years, in Eastern Zimbabwe. We found substance use to be low overall (6.4%, 3.2%, and 0.9% of males reported alcohol, drug, and cigarette use; <1% of females reported any substance use), but was more common in male maternal and double orphans than non-orphans. Substance use was positively associated with early sexual debut, number of sexual partners, and engaging in transactional sex, while school enrolment was associated with lower substance use in males. We conclude that education may reduce sexual risk behaviours and HIV infection rates among male adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa, in part, by reducing substance abuse.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Orphans; Zimbabwe; alcohol; drugs; smoking
Year: 2017 PMID: 29170681 PMCID: PMC5679749 DOI: 10.1080/17450128.2017.1332398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vulnerable Child Youth Stud ISSN: 1745-0128
Figure 1.Conceptual model and observed relationships between orphanhood, substance use, education, and HIV risk behaviour.
Age-adjusted odds-ratios for demographic factors and different forms of substance abuse.
| Males | Females | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking cigarettes | Taking drugs for pleasure | Drinking alcohol | Any substance use | Any substance use | ||||||||
| N | % | AOR (95% CI) | % | AOR (95% CI) | % | AOR (95% CI) | % | AOR (95% CI) | N | % | AOR (95% CI) | |
| Orphanhood | ||||||||||||
| Non-orphan | 789 | 0.9% | 1 | 2.8% | 1 | 6.6% | 1 | 6.6% | 1 | 818 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Maternal | 364 | 1.4% | 1.7 (0.56–4.9) | 4.9% | 1.9 (1.04–3.5)* | 7.8% | 1.3 (0.82–2.1) | 8.5% | 1.4 (0.88–2.2) | 365 | 0.5% | 0.54 (0.12–2.4) |
| Paternal | 699 | 0.9% | 0.77 (0.27–2.2) | 3.6% | 1.2 (0.66–2.1) | 5.9% | 0.80 (0.52–1.2) | 6.6% | 0.89 (0.59–1.3) | 699 | 0.9% | 0.83 (0.29–2.4) |
| Double | 280 | 1.1% | 1.1 (0.30–3.9) | 5.4% | 2.0 (1.04–3.7)* | 7.6% | 1.2 (0.72–2.0) | 8.6% | 1.3 (0.81–2.2) | 259 | 0.4% | 0.36 (0.05–2.8) |
| Community type | ||||||||||||
| Town | 245 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 3.7% | 1 | 3.7% | 1 | 262 | 1.1% | 1 |
| Commercial estate | 336 | 11.9% | 1.5 (0.28–8.5) | 2.7% | 7.2 (0.89–57.6) | 7.1% | 2.2 (0.97–4.8) | 7.7% | 2.4 (1.1–5.3)* | 347 | 0% | N/A |
| Subsistence farming | 662 | 1.1% | 1.4 (0.28–6.6) | 3.8% | 10.5 (1.4–78.6)* | 7.1% | 2.1 (1.01–4.5)* | 7.4% | 2.2 (1.1–4.7)* | 688 | 1.3% | 1.2 (0.32–4.4) |
| Roadside trading centre | 366 | 0.5% | 0.61 (0.09–4.4) | 4.4% | 10.5 (1.4–80.5)* | 6.0% | 1.6 (0.69–3.5) | 6.6% | 1.7 (0.78–3.9) | 368 | 0.8% | 0.74 (0.15–3.7) |
| SES | ||||||||||||
| Poorest quintile | 293 | 1.4% | 1 | 2.0% | 1 | 4.8% | 1 | 4.8% | 1 | 283 | 0% | N/A |
| Second quintile | 361 | 0.8% | 0.56 (0.12–2.5) | 4.2% | 2.0 (0.73–5.2) | 6.4% | 1.3 (0.64–2.6) | 7.5% | 1.5 (0.78–3.1) | 374 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Middle quintile | 329 | 0.9% | 0.48 (0.10–2.2) | 4.0% | 1.4 (0.50–3.7) | 7.6% | 1.2 (0.60–2.4) | 7.9% | 1.3 (0.63–2.5) | 353 | 1.4% | 5.3 (0.62–45.9) |
| Fourth quintile | 338 | 0.3% | 0.17 (0.02–1.5) | 3.0% | 1.1 (0.39–3.1) | 6.0% | 1.0 (0.49–2.0) | 6.2% | 1.0 (0.51–2.1) | 311 | 1.0% | 3.6 (0.38–35.1) |
| Least poor quintile | 286 | 1.3% | 0.75 (0.18–3.1) | 2.4% | 0.83 (0.27–2.5) | 7.0% | 1.1 (0.55–2.3) | 7.0% | 1.1 (0.54–2.3) | 342 | 1.8% | 6.6 (0.80–55.5) |
| Religion | ||||||||||||
| Christian | 869 | 1.0% | 1 | 3.7% | 1 | 7.4% | 1 | 7.5% | 1 | 900 | 1.4% | 1 |
| Traditional | 4 | 0% | N/A | 0% | N/A | 0% | N/A | 0% | N/A | 3 | 0% | N/A |
| Spiritual | 411 | 0.5% | 0.48 (0.10–2.3) | 1.2% | 0.33 (0.1–0.86)* | 4.1% | 0.55 (0.3–0.96)* | 4.1% | 0.54 (0.3–0.95)* | 494 | 0.2% | 0.14 (0.02–1.1) |
| Other | 231 | 0.9% | 0.87 (0.19–4.1) | 3.0% | 0.86 (0.37–2.0) | 5.7% | 0.78 (0.41–1.5) | 6.5% | 0.89 (0.49–1.6) | 244 | 0.4% | 0.27 (0.04–2.1) |
| None | 89 | 2.2% | 2.0 (0.41–9.4) | 7.9% | 2.0 (0.83–4.9) | 9.1% | 1.1 (0.50–2.5) | 12.4% | 1.6 (0.79–3.3) | 17 | 0% | N/A |
| School enrolmenta | ||||||||||||
| Not enroled | 320 | 1.9% | 1 | 5.3% | 1 | 9.7% | 1 | 10.6% | 1 | 493 | 1.4% | 1 |
| Enroled | 1055 | 0.3% | 0.24 (0.05–1.1) | 0.9% | 0.27 (0.1–0.64)* | 2.6% | 0.37 (0.2–0.7)** | 2.7% | 0.34 (0.2–0.6)** | 934 | 0.6% | 0.68 (0.19–2.4) |
aAges 15–18; N/A: No observations in comparison group; *Significant at p < 0.05; **Significant at p<0.01.
Effect of vulnerability and proposed protective effects on drug use, smoking, and drinking alcohol in male youth from Manicaland.
| Males | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking cigarettes | Taking drugs for pleasure | Drinking alcohol | Any substance use | ||||||
| N | % | AOR (95% CI)b | % | AOR (95% CI)b | % | AOR (95% CI)b | % | AOR (95% CI)b | |
| Orphanhood | |||||||||
| Non-orphan | 789 | 0.9% | 1 | 2.8% | 1 | 6.6% | 1 | 6.6% | 1 |
| Maternal orphan | 364 | 1.4% | 1.7 (0.56–4.9) | 4.9% | 1.9 (1.01–3.4)* | 7.8% | 1.2 (0.77–2.0) | 8.5% | 1.3 (0.84–2.1) |
| Paternal orphan | 699 | 0.9% | 0.77 (0.27–2.2) | 3.6% | 1.2 (0.64–2.1) | 5.9% | 0.77 (0.50–1.2) | 6.6% | 0.86 (0.57–1.3) |
| Double orphan | 280 | 1.1% | 1.1 (0.30–3.9) | 5.4% | 2.0 (1.04–3.8)* | 7.6% | 1.1 (0.67–1.9) | 8.6% | 1.2 (0.76–2.0) |
| School enrolment – all childrena | |||||||||
| Not enroled | 320 | 1.9% | 1 | 5.3% | 1 | 9.7% | 1 | 10.6% | 1 |
| Enroled | 1055 | 0.3% | 0.25 (0.06–1.1) | 0.9% | 0.26 (0.11–0.63)** | 2.6% | 0.32 (0.18–0.57)*** | 2.7% | 0.30 (0.17–0.53)*** |
| School enrolment – maternal orphansa | |||||||||
| Not enroled | 89 | 2.2% | 1 | 10.1% | 1 | 11.5% | 1 | 13.5% | 1 |
| Enroled | 226 | 0% | N/A | 0.9% | 0.13 (0.02–0.72)* | 3.1% | 0.30 (0.09–0.97)* | 3.1% | 0.30 (0.10–0.91)* |
| School enrolment – paternal orphansa | |||||||||
| Not enroled | 161 | 2.5% | 1 | 8.1% | 1 | 9.4% | 1 | 11.2% | 1 |
| Enroled | 431 | 0% | N/A | 0.7% | 0.15 (0.04–0.60)** | 2.3% | 0.36 (0.15–0.90)* | 2.3% | 0.32 (0.13–0.78)* |
| School enrolment – double orphansa | |||||||||
| Not enroled | 71 | 1.4% | 1 | 11.3% | 1 | 11.4% | 1 | 14.1% | 1 |
| Enroled | 169 | 0% | N/A | 1.2% | 0.17 (0.03–0.95)* | 3.6% | 0.33 (0.09–1.2) | 3.6% | 0.32 (0.09–1.1) |
aAges 15–18; N/A: No observations in comparison group;
bAdjusted for age, site type, SES, and religion.
*, **, *** Significant at p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001
Association between orphanhood, drug use, smoking, and drinking alcohol on sexual risk behaviours in male youth from Manicaland.
| Males | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condom use at last sexual encountera | Partners in last 30 daysa | Engaging in transactional sexa | Sexual debut before the age of 15 | Ever had sex | ||||||
| N | % | AOR (95% CI)c | Change (95% CI)c | % | AOR (95% CI)c | % | AOR (95%CI)c | % | AOR (95%CI)c | |
| Smoking | ||||||||||
| Non-smoker | 1594 | 69.9% | 1 | 0 | 3.2% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 5.9% | 1 |
| Smoker | 15 | 80.0% | 1.6 (0.24–10.4) | 1.2 (−1.2–+3.7) | 20.0% | 7.6 (1.1–52.3)* | 6.7% | 10.0 (1.1–92.2)* | 66.7% | 23.6 (7.0–79.3)*** |
| Drug use | ||||||||||
| Does not use drugs | 1555 | 68.4% | 1 | 0 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 5.1% | 1 |
| Uses drugs | 51 | 79.2% | 1.4 (0.39–4.7) | 0.67 (−1.1–+2.4) | 16.7% | 18.6 (1.8–197)* | 3.9% | 5.1 (0.85–30.2) | 47.1% | 8.0 (4.2–15.3)*** |
| Alcohol | ||||||||||
| Does not drink | 1502 | 64.5% | 1 | 0 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 4.1% | 1 |
| Drinks | 102 | 80.5% | 2.9 (0.87–9.6) | 1.6 (0.01–3.1)* | 9.8% | 6.6 (0.58–73.9) | 4.9% | 14.4 (3.4–87.8)** | 40.2% | 8.7 (5.2–14.5)*** |
| Any form of substance use | ||||||||||
| No substance use | 1501 | 64.5% | 1 | 0 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 4.1% | 1 |
| Substance use | 108 | 80.5% | 2.9 (0.87–9.6) | 1.6 (0.01–3.1)* | 9.8% | 6.6 (0.58–73.9) | 4.6% | 15.8 (3.0–83.2)** | 38.0% | 8.0 (4.8–13.4)*** |
| Orphanhood | ||||||||||
| Non-orphan | 789 | 71.1% | 1 | 0 | 2.2% | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 5.7% | 1 |
| Maternal orphan | 364 | 73.1% | 0.81 (0.25–2.6) | 1.4 (0.50–4.4)* | 11.5% | 5.4 (0.69–42.3) | 0.5% | 1.0 (0.21–5.2) | 7.1% | 1.1 (0.70–1.9) |
| Paternal orphan | 699 | 67.3% | 0.73 (0.27–2.0) | 1.9 (0.01–3.7)* | 5.8% | 1.0 (0.15–6.8) | 0.5% | 1.1 (0.26–4.3) | 7.4% | 1.3 (0.82–2.0) |
| Double orphan | 280 | 68.1% | 0.50 (0.14–1.8) | 2.5 (0.51–4.6)* | 9.1% | 2.3 (0.26–20.6) | 0.7% | 1.2 (0.23–6.1) | 7.9% | 1.3 (0.76–2.2) |
| Orphanhood – adjusting for substance use | ||||||||||
| Non-orphan | 789 | 71.1% | 1 | 0 | 2.2% | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 5.7% | 1 |
| Maternal orphan | 364 | 73.1% | 0.67 (0.19–2.3) | 1.3 (−0.37–+3.0) | 11.5% | 4.3 (0.54–34.0) | 0.5% | 0.95 (0.18–5.1) | 7.1% | 1.0 (0.61–1.7) |
| Paternal orphan | 699 | 67.3% | 0.85 (0.31–2.4) | −0.1 (−1.5–+1.4) | 5.8% | 1.2 (0.16–8.5) | 0.5% | 1.2 (0.29–5.0) | 7.4% | 1.4 (0.87–2.2) |
| Double orphan | 280 | 68.1% | 0.45 (0.12–1.7) | 1.7 (−0.08–+3.5) | 9.1% | 1.7 (0.2–14.7) | 0.7% | 1.3 (0.25–7.4) | 7.9% | 1.3 (0.72–2.2) |
| School enrolmentb | ||||||||||
| Not enroled | 320 | 82.8% | 1 | 0 | 2.9% | 1 | 0.6% | 1 | 11.0% | 1 |
| Enroled | 1055 | 61.9% | 0.30 (0.06–1.6) | −1.2 (−3.3–+0.9) | 4.8% | 1.1 (0.05–22.0) | 0.3% | 0.85 (0.13–5.7) | 2.0% | 0.35 (0.19–0.64)*** |
| School enrolment – adjusting for substance useb | ||||||||||
| Not enroled | 320 | 82.8% | 1 | 0 | 2.9% | 1 | 0.6% | 1 | 11.0% | 1 |
| Enroled | 1055 | 61.9% | 0.31 (0.06–1.6) | −1.1 (−3.2–+0.9) | 4.8% | 1.3 (0.05–32.2) | 0.3% | 2.0 (0.23–16.6) | 2.0% | 0.45 (0.24–0.86)* |
aAmong sexually active; bAges 15–18; cAdjusted for age, community type, SES, and religion.
Figure 2.Drug use (a) and alcohol consumption (b) in male orphans and non-orphans under age 19 by school enrolment status.