Literature DB >> 29170258

Mechanisms for the functional differentiation of the propulsive and braking roles of the forelimbs and hindlimbs during quadrupedal walking in primates and felines.

Michael C Granatosky1, Aidan Fitzsimons2, Angel Zeininger2, Daniel Schmitt2.   

Abstract

During quadrupedal walking in most animals, the forelimbs play a net braking role, whereas the hindlimbs are net propulsive. However, the mechanism by which this differentiation occurs remains unclear. Here, we test two models to explain this pattern using primates and felines: (1) the horizontal strut effect (in which limbs are modeled as independent struts), and (2) the linked strut model (in which limbs are modeled as linked struts with a center of mass in between). Video recordings were used to determine point of contact, timing of mid-stance, and limb protraction/retraction duration. Single-limb forces were used to calculate contact time, impulses and the proportion of the stride at which the braking-to-propulsive transition (BP) occurred for each limb. We found no association between the occurrence of the BP and mid-stance, little influence of protraction and retraction duration on the braking-propulsive function of a limb, and a causative relationship between vertical force distribution between limbs and the patterns of horizontal forces. These findings reject the horizontal strut effect, and provide some support for the linked strut model, although predictions were not perfectly matched. We suggest that the position of the center of mass relative to limb contact points is a very important, but not the only, factor driving functional differentiation of the braking and propulsive roles of the limbs in quadrupeds. It was also found that primates have greater differences in horizontal impulse between their limbs compared with felines, a pattern that may reflect a fundamental arboreal adaptation in primates.
© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Keywords:  Center of mass; Horizontal force; Horizontal strut effect; Linked strut model; Mid-stance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29170258     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.162917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  2 in total

1.  Management factors affecting physical health and welfare of tourist camp elephants in Thailand.

Authors:  Pakkanut Bansiddhi; Korakot Nganvongpanit; Janine L Brown; Veerasak Punyapornwithaya; Pornsawan Pongsopawijit; Chatchote Thitaram
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Limb work and joint work minimization reveal an energetic benefit to the elbows-back, knees-forward limb design in parasagittal quadrupeds.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Michael C Granatosky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.