Avital Fischer1, Argyrios Ziogas1, Hoda Anton-Culver2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA. Electronic address: hantoncu@uci.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The influence of stress on breast cancer risk remains unknown. The goal of the present study was to determine the effect of stress in the form of salient positive and negative valence life events (LEs) on primary invasive breast cancer risk. We hypothesized that salient negative LEs would increase breast cancer risk and salient positive LEs would attenuate this increased risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a case-control design with 664 cases identified through the Cancer Surveillance Program of Orange County and 203 population-based controls. Participants completed a risk factor questionnaire, which included a LE section. Fourteen salient LEs of positive or negative valence were used to quantify stress exposure. A baseline model was constructed, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariate unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Negative LEs were associated with increased breast cancer risk. The OR for ≥ 4 negative LEs showed a 2.81-fold increase in breast cancer risk (OR, 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-5.36). A significant dose-response relationship between lifetime negative valence LEs and breast cancer risk was found. Previous personal illness increased breast cancer risk by 3.6-fold (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.50-5.20). In contrast, abortion was associated with a 45% decrease in breast cancer risk (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89). Salient positive LEs did not have a significant effect on breast cancer risk. However, they seemed to buffer the adverse effect of salient negative LEs on breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present study support the role of salient negative LEs in promoting breast cancer development, with a possible buffering effect of salient positive LEs.
BACKGROUND: The influence of stress on breast cancer risk remains unknown. The goal of the present study was to determine the effect of stress in the form of salient positive and negative valence life events (LEs) on primary invasive breast cancer risk. We hypothesized that salient negative LEs would increase breast cancer risk and salient positive LEs would attenuate this increased risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a case-control design with 664 cases identified through the Cancer Surveillance Program of Orange County and 203 population-based controls. Participants completed a risk factor questionnaire, which included a LE section. Fourteen salient LEs of positive or negative valence were used to quantify stress exposure. A baseline model was constructed, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariate unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Negative LEs were associated with increased breast cancer risk. The OR for ≥ 4 negative LEs showed a 2.81-fold increase in breast cancer risk (OR, 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-5.36). A significant dose-response relationship between lifetime negative valence LEs and breast cancer risk was found. Previous personal illness increased breast cancer risk by 3.6-fold (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.50-5.20). In contrast, abortion was associated with a 45% decrease in breast cancer risk (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89). Salient positive LEs did not have a significant effect on breast cancer risk. However, they seemed to buffer the adverse effect of salient negative LEs on breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present study support the role of salient negative LEs in promoting breast cancer development, with a possible buffering effect of salient positive LEs.
Authors: J A Largent; A J McEligot; A Ziogas; C Reid; J Hess; N Leighton; D Peel; H Anton-Culver Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2006-08-03 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Jo Anne Dumalaon-Canaria; Amanda D Hutchinson; Ivanka Prichard; Carlene Wilson Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jennifer M P Woo; Amanda Simanek; Katie M O'Brien; Christine Parks; Symielle Gaston; Paul L Auer; Rebecca Headley Konkel; Chandra L Jackson; Helen C S Meier; Dale P Sandler Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Cristian Ochoa-Arnedo; Clàudia Prats; Noemie Travier; Laia Marques-Feixa; Aida Flix-Valle; María Lleras de Frutos; Esperanza Domingo-Gil; Joan Carles Medina; Maria Serra-Blasco Journal: Int J Clin Health Psychol Date: 2022-04-01