Literature DB >> 29169614

Human papillomavirus viral load as a useful triage tool for non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus positive women: A prospective screening cohort study.

Li Dong1, Margaret Z Wang2, Xue-Lian Zhao3, Rui-Mei Feng3, Shang-Ying Hu3, Qian Zhang3, Jennifer S Smith4, You-Lin Qiao3, Fang-Hui Zhao5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: ASCCP cervical cancer screening guidelines recommend triaging high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positive women with cytology and genotyping, but cytology is often unavailable in resource-limited areas. We compared the long-term risk of cervical cancer and precancers among type-specific hrHPV-positive women triaged by viral load to cytology and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA).
METHODS: A cohort of 1742 Chinese women was screened with cytology, VIA, and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test and followed for ten years. All HC2-positive samples were genotyped. Viral load was measured by HC2 relative light units/cutoff (RLU/CO). Ten-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) for type-specific hrHPV viral load was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: Baseline hrHPV viral load stratified by specific genotypes was positively correlated with prevalent cytological lesions. Ten-year CIR of CIN2+ was associated with cytological lesions and viral load. Among HPV 16/18-positive women, ten-year CIR of CIN2+ was high, even with normal cytology (15.3%), normal VIA (32.4%), viral load with RLU/CO<10 (23.6%) or RLU/CO<100 (33.8%). Among non-16/18 hrHPV positive women, ten-year CIR of CIN2+ was significantly stratified by cytology grade of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance or higher (2.0% VS. 34.6%), viral load cutoffs at 10 RLU/CO (5.1% VS. 27.2%), at 100 RLU/CO (11.0% VS. 35.5%), but not by VIA (19.1% VS. 19.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the guidelines in referring all HPV16/18 positive women to colposcopy and suggest triaging non-16/18 hrHPV positive women using viral loads in resource-limited areas where cytology screening was inaccessible.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Genotypes; Human papillomavirus; Risk stratification; Triage; Viral load

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29169614     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Changes in DNA Level of Oncogenic Human Papillomaviruses Other Than Types 16 and 18 in Relation to Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades 2 and 3.

Authors:  Long Fu Xi; Mark Schiffman; James P Hughes; Denise A Galloway; Laura A Koutsky; Nancy B Kiviat
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Association of HPV16 and 18 genomic copies with histological grades of cervical lesions.

Authors:  Negar Joharinia; Ali Farhadi; Seyed Younes Hosseini; Akbar Safaei; Jamal Sarvari
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2019-07-22

3.  Detection of HPV16 viral load in L2 gene as a related predictor of cervical cancer among women in Dhi-Qar province by qRT-PCR.

Authors:  Abduladheem Turki Jalil; Muhammad Usman Faryad Khan; Hayder Ali Muhammed; Ahmed Abdulhussein Kawen; Balsam Qubais Saeed; Aleksandr Karevskiy
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Verification of the association of the cycle threshold (Ct) values from HPV testing on Cobas4800 with the histologic grades of cervical lesions using data from two population-based cervical cancer screening trials.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Hui Du; Aimin Xiao; Wei Zhang; Chun Wang; Xia Huang; Xinfeng Qu; Jianliu Wang; Ruifang Wu
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.698

5.  Rising Mortality Rate of Cervical Cancer in Younger Women in Urban China.

Authors:  Min Wei; Wei Zhou; Yongyi Bi; Hong Wang; Yu Liu; Zhi-Jiang Zhang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.

Authors:  Fangbin Song; Hui Du; Chun Wang; Xia Huang; Ruifang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Risk stratification of HPV 16 DNA methylation combined with E6 oncoprotein in cervical cancer screening: a 10-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Li Dong; Li Zhang; Shang-Ying Hu; Rui-Mei Feng; Xue-Lian Zhao; Qian Zhang; Qin-Jing Pan; Xun Zhang; You-Lin Qiao; Fang-Hui Zhao
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.551

8.  HPV viral load in self-collected vaginal fluid samples as predictor for presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Malin Berggrund; Inger Gustavsson; Riina Aarnio; Julia Hedlund-Lindberg; Karin Sanner; Ingrid Wikström; Stefan Enroth; Matts Olovsson; Ulf Gyllensten
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Analysis of influencing factors of viral load in patients with high-risk human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Xuerong Lu; Tiantian Wang; Youzhong Zhang; Yuzhen Liu
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.099

10.  Association of Relative Telomere Length and Risk of High Human Papillomavirus Load in Cervical Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  A H Albosale; E V Mashkina
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 0.810

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.