Literature DB >> 2916879

Feasibility and safety of emergency interhospital transport of patients during early hours of acute myocardial infarction.

J M Gore1, J M Corrao, R J Goldberg, S P Ball, B H Weiner, R V Aghababian, J E Dalen.   

Abstract

The transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction from community hospitals to tertiary care facilities for further intervention has become increasingly more frequent due to the emerging role of thrombolytic therapy and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. To assess the feasibility and safety of early transfer, a prospective analysis of 57 patients who were transported by ground ambulance or helicopter to the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, for acute intervention during the early hours of myocardial infarction was conducted. Before transport, the majority (46 [81%]) of patients were having chest discomfort, 13 (23%) were hypotensive, and 12 (21%) were electrically unstable (defined as high-grade ventricular ectopia or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia). During transport, the majority (41 [72%]) continued to have some chest discomfort; however, only two (4%) remained hypotensive. Although five patients (9%) were electrically unstable during transport, the instability was considered noncritical. The distance traveled or the mode of transportation did not adversely impact on these clinical complications. All patients survived transport, and 53 patients (93%) were eventually discharged from the receiving hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2916879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  6 in total

1.  Transferring patients for primary angioplasty: a retrospective analysis of 104 selected high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  F Zijlstra; A W van 't Hof; A L Liem; J C Hoorntje; H Suryapranata; M J de Boer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eddy Fan; Russell D MacDonald; Neill K J Adhikari; Damon C Scales; Randy S Wax; Thomas E Stewart; Niall D Ferguson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  Host and viral determinants of influenza A virus species specificity.

Authors:  Jason S Long; Bhakti Mistry; Stuart M Haslam; Wendy S Barclay
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Does interhospital transfer improve outcome of acute myocardial infarction? A propensity score analysis from the Cardiovascular Cooperative Project.

Authors:  John M Westfall; Catarina I Kiefe; Norman W Weissman; Anthony Goudie; Robert M Centor; O Dale Williams; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Genetic characteristics and pathogenesis of H5 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses from wild birds and domestic ducks in South Korea.

Authors:  Yu-Na Lee; Dong-Hun Lee; Sun-Ha Cheon; Yu-Ri Park; Yoon-Gi Baek; Young-Jae Si; Soo-Jeong Kye; Eun-Kyoung Lee; Gyeong-Beom Heo; You-Chan Bae; Myoung-Heon Lee; Youn-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Rank orders of mammalian pathogenicity-related PB2 mutations of avian influenza A viruses.

Authors:  Chung-Young Lee; Se-Hee An; Jun-Gu Choi; Youn-Jeong Lee; Jae-Hong Kim; Hyuk-Joon Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.