| Literature DB >> 29168759 |
Changhang Xu1, Jing Xie2, Wuyang Zhang3, Qingzhao Kong4, Guoming Chen5, Gangbing Song6.
Abstract
Vibrothermography often employs a high-power actuator to generate heat on a specimen to reveal damage, however, the high-power actuator brings inconvenience to the application and possibly introduces additional damage to the inspected objects. This study uses a low-power piezoceramic transducer as the actuator of vibrothermography and explores its ability to detect multiple surface cracks in a metal part. Experiments were conducted on a thin aluminum beam with three cracks in different orientations. Detailed analyses of both thermograms and temperature data are presented to validate the proposed vibrothermography method. To further investigate the performance of the proposed vibrothermography method, we experimentally studied the effects of several critical factors, including the amplitude of excitation signal, specimen constraints, relative position between the transducer and cracks (the transducer is mounted on the same or the opposite side with the cracks). The results demonstrate that all cracks can be detected conveniently and simultaneously by using the proposed low-power vibrothermography. We also found that the magnitude of excitation signal and the specimen constraints have a great influence on detection results. Combined with effective data processing methods, such as Fourier transformation employed in this study, the proposed method provides a promising potential to detect multiple cracks on a metal surface in a safe and effective manner.Entities:
Keywords: lower power actuator; multiple cracks detection; piezoceramic actuator; vibrothermography
Year: 2017 PMID: 29168759 PMCID: PMC5751587 DOI: 10.3390/s17122705
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The experimental setup for multi cracks detection using vibrothermography.
Figure 2A PZT transducer as an ultrasonic exciter.
Figure 3Test specimen with thickness of 3 mm: (a) the sketch of the specimen; and (b) a zoomed view of the cracks.
Figure 4With the excitation amplitude of 150 V, the thermograms captured at: (a) 4.8 s; (b) 6 s; (c) 45 s; and (d) 92 s. Note: The actuator was mounted on the right part of the specimen, which is not displayed in these figures.
Figure 5Temperature evolutions of the cracks and surrounding areas (the locations of the points are shown in Figure 4b).
Figure 6IR image of different excitation signal amplitudes: (a) 60 V; (b) 80 V; (c) 120 V; and (d) 150 V.
Temperature difference between each crack and its surrounding areas.
| Crack | Cracks I | Cracks II | Horizontal Crack | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voltage (V) | 80 | 120 | 150 | 80 | 120 | 150 | 80 | 120 | 150 |
| Temperature Difference (°C) | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Figure 7Phase image at 0.043 Hz obtained by implementing DFT on the raw detection data with using an excitation amplitude of 60 V: (a) color mode; and (b) grayscale mode.
Figure 8Thermograms of specimen captured under different constraints conditions: (a) partially fixed at both ends; and (b) fixed at one end.
Figure 9IR image with the actuator mounted on the opposite side of the cracks and IR camera.