Literature DB >> 2916871

Oral nifedipine vs oral clonidine in the treatment of urgent hypertension.

M Jaker1, S Atkin, M Soto, G Schmid, F Brosch.   

Abstract

Fifty-one patients with urgent hypertension were treated in the emergency department with either oral nifedipine or oral clonidine in a randomized double-blind prospective study. Nifedipine was administered as a single dose of 20 mg. Clonidine was administered as an initial dose of 0.1 mg with hourly doses of 0.1 mg. Nifedipine was successful in reducing diastolic blood pressure in 83% of the patients within 45 minutes and in 96% of the patients within two hours, with a mean reduction in systolic blood pressure of 47 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of 29 mm Hg. Thirty percent of those who initially responded to nifedipine experienced a subsequent increase in diastolic blood pressure to pretreatment levels within three hours. Clonidine was successful in reducing diastolic blood pressure in 79% of the patients within four hours, with a mean reduction in systolic blood pressure of 51 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of 30 mm Hg. Our results indicate that both nifedipine and clonidine are safe and effective in the treatment of urgent hypertension. Nifedipine had a much more rapid onset of action with a greater initial success rate, and it was free from the sedative side effects of clonidine. We believe that either nifedipine or clonidine may be used as first-line therapy in the treatment of urgent hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2916871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  David Cherney; Sharon Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Excessive Blood Pressure Response to Clonidine in Hospitalized Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Hypertension.

Authors:  Jonathan Hanna; Lama Ghazi; Yu Yamamoto; Michael Simonov; Tayyab Shah; Francis P Wilson; Aldo J Peixoto
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 3.  Comparative tolerability profile of hypertensive crisis treatments.

Authors:  E Grossman; A N Ironi; F H Messerli
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Guidelines for the drug treatment of hypertensive crises.

Authors:  M M Hirschl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Characteristics and management of patients presenting to the emergency department with hypertensive urgency.

Authors:  Seth R Bender; Michael W Fong; Sabine Heitz; John D Bisognano
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Hypertensive urgency.

Authors:  Joel Handler
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Blood pressure response to commonly administered antihypertensives for severe inpatient hypertension.

Authors:  Lama Ghazi; Fan Li; Xinyuan Chen; Michael Simonov; Yu Yamamoto; Aditya Biswas; Jonathan Hanna; Tayyab Shah; Aldo J Peixoto; F Perry Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertensive Urgency in the Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claudia L Campos; Charles T Herring; Asima N Ali; Deanna N Jones; James L Wofford; Augustus L Caine; Robert L Bloomfield; Janine Tillett; Karen S Oles
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.128

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.