| Literature DB >> 29168636 |
Jordan T Koehn1, Estela S Magallanes1, Benjamin J Peters1, Cheryle N Beuning1, Allison A Haase1, Michelle J Zhu1, Christopher D Rithner1, Dean C Crick1, Debbie C Crans1.
Abstract
Menaquinones (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29168636 PMCID: PMC5759649 DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Org Chem ISSN: 0022-3263 Impact factor: 4.354
Figure 1Structure of menaquinone-9 (MK-9), a representative MK found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (top) and MK-2, a simplified MK analog (bottom), is also shown. Protons are labeled on MK-2 for spectral interpretation.
Scheme 1Synthetic Route To Prepare MK-2 4 from Menadiol 2 and Geraniol 3 using Lewis Acid Catalyst Conditions[45,46]
Figure 21D 1H NMR (400 MHz) spectra of MK-2 in hydrophilic (d6-DMSO, d3-acetonitrile, and D2O) and hydrophobic [isooctane (2,2,4-trimethtylpentane), d5-pyridine, and d6-benzene] solvents. Proton peak text labeling corresponds to MK-2 structure in Figure .
Figure 31H–1H 2D NOESY and 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR (400 MHz) spectra of 20 mM MK-2 in d6-DMSO and d5-pyridine at 26 °C. (A) Full 1H–1H 2D NOESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (B) Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (C) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (D) Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d5-pyrdine. (E) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d5-pyrdine. (F) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d5-pyridine illustrating stacking interactions. Blue intensity contours represent negative NOE’s or ROE’s, and red intensity contours represent positive NOE’s or ROE’s. A standard NOESY pulse sequence was used consisting of 200–256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 500 ms mixing time and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. A standard ROESYAD pulse sequence was used consisting of 200 or 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 400 ms mixing time and a 2.0 s relaxation delay. The structure of MK-2 is shown with a proton labeling scheme key. Green arrows indicate proton Hw, where the observed cross peaks differed the most between the two solvents studied.
Figure 4MK-2 conformations generated using MMFF94 calculations to illustrate the conformations elucidated by the 2D NMR studies. (A) Illustrates the MK-2 conformation in d6-DMSO determined from 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data cross peak interactions (66.8 kcal/mol, and internuclear distance Hw–Hy: 2.6 Å). (B) Illustrates a potential U-shaped MK-2 conformation in d5-pyridine consistent with the 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data cross peak interactions (66.7 kcal/mol, and internuclear distance Hw–Hy: 6.1 Å). See Supporting Information for a table of selected proton to proton distances for conformations A and B.
Figure 5Three representative CVs of 2 mM MK-2 in CH3CN, DMSO, and pyridine. The potentials are referenced to the Fc+/Fc couple (2 mM) determined in each solvent. From left to right, redox processes are Q•–/Q2–, Q/Q•–, and Fc+/Fc. Each sample has 0.1 M TBAP and was degassed with argon gas for 10 min at ambient room temperature before spectra were recorded. Current sweeps are in the anodic direction from −2 V to 1 V and back to −2 V. A 100 mV scan rate was used.
Figure 6Measured E1/2 (vs Fc+/Fc in V) of MK-2 Q/Q•– and Q•–/Q2– redox processes vs solvent. Added lines show the distinction between each solvent for each redox process. Each solvent was run in triplicate with error bars shown. Student’s t test indicated the half wave potentials of each redox process are significantly different in each solvent (p < 0.01 for Q•–/Q2– CH3CN-DMSO and p < 0.0001 for all other comparisons). See Supporting Information for details.
Figure 7Schematic diagram of (A) a Langmuir phospholipid monolayer and (B) a RM present in a microemulsion. Labeling for the RM is as follows: the water pool (A), the Stern layer (B), the surfactant tails (C), and the organic solvent, isooctane (D).
Figure 8Compression isotherms of MK-2 films (dotted lines), DPPC or DPPE phospholipid films (solid lines), or a 50:50 mixture of MK-2 and phospholipid (dashed line). On the left (A) are the resulting compression isotherms of MK-2 and DPPC, while on the right (B) are the resulting compression isotherms of MK-2 and DPPE.
Figure 91D 1H NMR (400 MHz) spectra of MK-2’s aromatic protons, Ha, Hb, Hc, and Hd in D2O, isooctane, and different sized RMs. Proton peak text labeling corresponds to MK-2 proton labeling scheme key found in Figure . Ha, Hb, Hc, and Hd protons undergo a chemical shift upon inclusion inside RMs.
Figure 10Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR (400 MHz) spectra of MK-2 inside w0 12 RM at 26 °C. (A) Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY NMR spectrum in a w 12 RM. (B) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum in a w 12 RM. Blue to blue proton text labeling shows MK-2 to MK-2 interactions, teal to teal proton text labeling shows AOT to AOT interactions, and blue to teal proton text labeling shows MK-2 to AOT interactions. Blue intensity contours represent negative NOE’s or ROE’s and red intensity contours represent positive NOE’s or ROE’s. A standard NOESY pulse sequence was used consisting of 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 200 ms mixing time and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. A standard ROESYAD pulse sequence was used consisting of 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 200 ms mixing time and a 2.0 s relaxation delay. See Figure for MK-2 proton labeling scheme key and Figure for AOT proton labeling scheme key.
Figure 11Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY NMR (400 MHz) spectra of MK-2 inside a w 12 RM at 26 °C illustrating interactions of MK-2 with the AOT surfactant tails. (A) Interactions between MK-2’s aromatic protons and AOT. (B) Interactions between MK-2 alkene protons and AOT. The blue to blue proton text labeling shows MK-2 to MK-2 interactions, teal to teal proton text labeling shows AOT to AOT interactions, and blue to teal proton text labeling shows MK-2 to AOT interactions. Blue intensity contours represent negative NOE’s, and red intensity contours represent positive NOE’s. A standard NOESY pulse sequence was used consisting of 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 200 ms mixing time and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. See Figure for MK-2 proton labeling scheme key and Figure for AOT proton labeling scheme key.
Figure 12Illustration of MK-2’s proposed folded, U-shaped conformation and placement in the RM interface. This arrangement is consistent with 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data obtained in a w 12 RM; however, MK-2 likely tumbles freely within the interface but maintains interactions with the region of AOT shown in the illustration. Color depth fading legend shows dark red as closer in distance and dark blue as farther in distance from the reader. AOT proton labeling scheme key is shown.
Figure 13MK-2 conformation at an interface visualized using MMFF94 calculations. Molecular mechanics simulations generating the 3D conformation of MK-2 in a RM that is consistent with 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data. (A) Side view of energy minimized conformation (63.5 kcal/mol, and internuclear distance Hw–Hz: 4.0 Å) showing MK-2’s isoprene side-chain adopting a hook-like shape also known as a folded, U-shaped conformation. (B) Top view of energy minimized conformation showing the terminal isoprene methyl groups overlapping the carbonyl groups on the napthoquinone.