Menaquinones (naphthoquinones, MK) are isoprenoids that play key roles in the respiratory electron transport system of some prokaryotes by shuttling electrons between membrane-bound protein complexes acting as electron acceptors and donors. Menaquinone-2 (MK-2), a truncated MK, was synthesized, and the studies presented herein characterize the conformational and chemical properties of the hydrophobic MK-2 molecule. Using 2D NMR spectroscopy, we established for the first time that MK-2 has a folded conformation defined by the isoprenyl side-chain folding back over the napthoquinone in a U-shape, which depends on the specific environmental conditions found in different solvents. We used molecular mechanics to illustrate conformations found by the NMR experiments. The measured redox potentials of MK-2 differed in three organic solvents, where MK-2 was most easily reduced in DMSO, which may suggest a combination of solvent effect (presumably in part because of differences in dielectric constants) and/or conformational differences of MK-2 in different organic solvents. Furthermore, MK-2 was found to associate with the interface of model membranes represented by Langmuir phospholipid monolayers and Aerosol-OT (AOT) reverse micelles. MK-2 adopts a slightly different U-shaped conformation within reverse micelles compared to within solution, which is in sharp contrast to the extended conformations illustrated in literature for MKs.
Menaquinones (naphthoquinones, MK) are isoprenoids that play key roles in the respiratory electron transport system of some prokaryotes by shuttling electrons between membrane-bound protein complexes acting as electron acceptors anddonors. Menaquinone-2 (MK-2), a truncated MK, was synthesized, and the studies presented herein characterize the conformational and chemical properties of the hydrophobic MK-2 molecule. Using 2DNMR spectroscopy, we established for the first time that MK-2 has a folded conformation defined by the isoprenyl side-chain folding back over the napthoquinone in a U-shape, which depends on the specific environmental conditions found in different solvents. We used molecular mechanics to illustrate conformations found by the NMR experiments. The measured redox potentials of MK-2differed in three organic solvents, where MK-2 was most easily reduced in DMSO, which may suggest a combination of solvent effect (presumably in part because of differences in dielectric constants) and/or conformational differences of MK-2 in different organic solvents. Furthermore, MK-2 was found to associate with the interface of model membranes represented by Langmuir phospholipid monolayers and Aerosol-OT (AOT) reverse micelles. MK-2 adopts a slightly different U-shaped conformation within reverse micelles compared to within solution, which is in sharp contrast to the extended conformations illustrated in literature for MKs.
Isoprenoids
are among the most numerous anddiverse compounds found
in nature.[1−3] It was reported that 55,000 of these naturally occurring
compounds had been identified by 2007;[3] an estimate that increased to 70,000 in 2015.[1] Classes of isoprenoids include lipoquinones, sterols, carotenoids,
prenylated proteins, dolichols, monoterpenes, andsesquiterpenes.
These compounds are involved in diverse functions such as electron
transport, hormone function, membrane structure and fluidity, vision,
photoprotection, insect reproduction, fragrance, anddefense. The
solution structures of many of these compounds, such as the sterols,
are well studied. However, the conformations of long linear polymers
of isoprene units such as those found in the side-chains of lipoquinones
involved in bacterial and eukaryotic electron transport systems (ETS)
have not been characterized.[4−7] Lipoquinones are small hydrophobic molecules that
shuttle electrons between the membrane-bound protein complexes acting
as electron acceptors anddonors in the respiratory ETS. Two major
structural groups of lipoquinones are recognized: ubiquinones (or
benzoquinones, UBQ) typically found in eukaryotes and Gram-negative
prokaryotes andmenaquinones (or naphthoquinones, MK) typically found
in Gram-positive prokaryotes, including many pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The roles and applications of
lipoquinonederivatives are currently being explored where a range
of different approaches are used for combatting humandiseases.[8−20] This manuscript aims to characterize the conformation of a synthetic
truncated MK analog within organic solutions and within a model membrane
interface as well as document the redox potential of these systems
accompanying the conformational studies.Here, we use an abbreviation
system where MK with two isoprene
units is MK-2 and with nine isoprene units is MK-9, Figure . Naturally occurring lipoquinones
are characterized by the presence of an isoprenyl side-chain of varying
length from 1 to 14 isoprene units[21,22] depending
on the species of origin; a characteristic long used to assist taxonomic
efforts. Textbooks often represent UBQ and MK as “Q”
or “MQ” in illustrations of the ETS, and in primary
literature they are generally shown in an extended conformation, Figure .[7,23,24] The extended conformation of these molecules
seems highly unlikely in light of the one-step cyclization of squalene
epoxide, an isoprenoid compound containing six isoprene units, to
form the protosterol cation, which contains the basic steroidal ring
system with eight chiral centers.[25,26] Woodward reported
the cyclization of this polyisoprenoid squalene epoxide forming only
one stereoisomer out of the possible 256 (28) in 1953.[25,26] The stereospecificity of this reaction requires preorganization
of the epoxide before protonation, and such a conformer is not the
extended conformation commonly depicted in the literature.
Figure 1
Structure of
menaquinone-9 (MK-9), a representative MK found in Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (top) and MK-2, a simplified
MK analog (bottom), is also shown. Protons are labeled on MK-2 for
spectral interpretation.
Structure of
menaquinone-9 (MK-9), a representative MK found in Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (top) andMK-2, a simplified
MK analog (bottom), is also shown. Protons are labeled on MK-2 for
spectral interpretation.Small angle X-ray diffraction experiments with the isoprenoiddolichol,
an alcohol with 18–20 isoprene units, indicated that the molecule
adopted a helical structure in organic solvent.[27] The conformation of the isoprenoid moiety in MK derivatives
is likely important to its function as an electron-transfer agent
and other biological roles. Although nothing is known about the conformation
of MK derivatives, limited conformational analysis is available on
different classes of compounds including alkanes, alkenes, and fatty
acids with much simpler structures.[28−42] The all-trans conformations of alkanes are generally
considered the most stable, and therefore, it is expected that the
most prevalent conformation of an alkane is the fully extended alkyl
chain.[28] A few studies have been reported
with simple alkanes and a range of other, more complex compounds with
large alkane-components such as in polyenes andfatty acids.[29,30] The U-shape in fatty acids was described when bound to a fatty acid
binding protein (FABP), where the alkyl chain region of two fatty
acids, palmitic andoleic acids, folds over in the shape of a U.[39,40] In 2008, X-ray crystal structure analysis, as well as NMR spectroscopy,
also supported the U-shaped conformation of amphiphilic alkyl chains
bound to a synthetic receptor where the folded C8, C10, and C12 conformations have anticlinal as well
as gauche arrangements.[39,40] Based on these few examples, we hypothesized that MKs will adopt
folded conformations depending on specific environmental conditions.In this manuscript, we describe the synthesis and characterization
of a truncated MK derivative with two isoprene units. MK-2 (Figure ) can be characterized
in detail and serves as a representative MK reference compound as
it is the simplest MK containing a napthoquinone and repeating isoprenyl
side-chain allowing comparison to more complex MK-derivatives found
in various microorganisms.[6,43,44] First, the conformation of MK-2 was investigated in organic solvents
(polar and hydrophobic). Next, because we are ultimately interested
in the function of these derivatives, we measured the electrochemical
potential of MK-2 in the organic solvents where the conformations
were determined. Finally, the location and conformation of MK-2 in
simple membrane model systems was examined. Combined, our results
show that MK-2 folds into a U-shaped conformation in solution contrary
to common perception and that a folded, slightly different U-shaped
conformation also exists in the presence of a simple model lipid membrane
interface.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of MK-2
MK-2 was synthesized
using a procedure
in literature (Scheme ).[45,46] First, menadione 1 was reduced
to the corresponding menadiol 2 using aqueous sodium
dithionite. Geraniol 3 was coupled to menadiol 2 using the Lewis acid catalyst, boron trifluoride. This preparation
produced a yield of 20% overall, which is lower than the reportedMK-2 preparation with the deuterated analog in literature.[45] The lower yield appears to be due to extensive
alkylation at the C2 position instead of the desired C3 position;
however, this side product is readily separated using column chromatography.
Highly pure material yields a yellow solid upon crystallization at
−20 °C and retains this state when warmed to room temperature,
while material with impurities does not crystallize and remains a
red oil.
Scheme 1
Synthetic Route To Prepare MK-2 4 from Menadiol 2 and Geraniol 3 using Lewis Acid Catalyst Conditions[45,46]
1D 1H NMR Spectroscopic
Studies of MK-2 in Different
Solvents
MK-2 was first characterized using 1D1HNMR spectroscopy. Figure shows 1HNMR spectra of MK-2 in isooctane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane), d5-pyridine, d6-benzene, d3-acetonitrile, d6-DMSO, andD2O. The observed chemical shifts of MK-2 vary
dramatically in the different solvents shown. Hydrophobic solvent
environments including aliphatic (isooctane) and aromatic (d5-pyridine andd6-benzene) as well as hydrophilic (d3-acetonitrile, d6-DMSO, andH2O/D2O) solvent
environments generate very different spectroscopic signatures. For
example, the pairs of aromatic protons, Ha/Hb and Hc/Hd, are significantly different in
the two different classes of solvents. This observed variation in
chemical shift could be attributed to conformational changes of MK-2
in the various solvent environments investigated, alterations of the
electronic state due to interaction with the solvent, or most likely,
a combination of both. Focusing on the 1HNMR spectra of
MK-2 in the three hydrophilic solvents, d3-acetonitrile, d6-DMSO, andD2O, some differences and similarities are observed (Figure ). The MK-2 spectrum in D2O required significantly more scans to produce a reasonable
spectrum because of the poor solubility in D2O. The proton
chemical shifts generally are observed further upfield in D2O, presumably indicative of more aggregation in this solvent. The
alkene Hh and Hi proton signals are not observed
in the D2O spectrum because of overlap with the HOD peak.
However, the HOD signal in the d6-DMSO
spectrum is observed at 3.3 ppm, which allows for observation of the
alkene protons, Hh and Hi, at 4.9 ppm. The spectrum
of MK-2 in d6-DMSO is very similar to
that in d3-acetonitrile, and both also
have some similarities to the MK-2 spectrum in D2O. The
aromatic protons, Ha/Hb, shifted about 0.2 ppm
from the Hc/Hd signals in both solvents. This
suggests that these protons remain in similar chemical environments
in these two solvent environments. Combined, these three spectra provide
a representation of the properties of the MK-2 in a hydrophilic solvent
environment.
Figure 2
1D 1H NMR (400 MHz) spectra of MK-2 in hydrophilic
(d6-DMSO, d3-acetonitrile,
and D2O) and hydrophobic [isooctane (2,2,4-trimethtylpentane), d5-pyridine, and d6-benzene] solvents. Proton peak text labeling corresponds to MK-2
structure in Figure .
1D1HNMR (400 MHz) spectra of MK-2 in hydrophilic
(d6-DMSO, d3-acetonitrile,
andD2O) and hydrophobic [isooctane (2,2,4-trimethtylpentane), d5-pyridine, andd6-benzene] solvents. Proton peak text labeling corresponds to MK-2
structure in Figure .Next, the aromatic andalkene
protons were examined in the hydrophobic
solvents, isooctane, d5-pyridine, andd6-benzene (Figure ). Here, protons Ha, Hb, Hc, Hd, Hh, and Hi are
observed and readily identified. The signals from alkene protons,
Hh and Hi, are both further downfield compared
to the signals in hydrophilic solvents, and most interestingly, the
two alkene protons become nonchemical shift equivalent in d5-pyridine. This contrasts with the aliphatic
protons in the spectrum in d6-benzene,
which are like those in d6-DMSO except
for Hq, Hr, Hw, and Hz. The changes in the chemical shifts are most distinctive in the
aromatic andalkene protons, suggesting that there are some major
differences in their respective environments. Together, these differences
strongly indicate that MK-2 is sensitive to the solvent environment.
However, information from 2D NMR experiments is needed to elucidate
if this change in chemical shift is due to conformational variations
and/or solvent effect.
1H–1H 2D NOESY
and 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR Spectroscopic
Studies of MK-2
in d6-DMSO and d5-Pyridine
Differences between the conformations observed
in d6-DMSO vs d5-pyridine are likely manifested by the conformation minimizing the
unfavorable interactions with the solvent environment and maximizing
favorable intramolecular interactions with the isoprenyl side-chain.
To investigate the conformation of MK-2 in organic solvents, we utilized
two different but complementary 2DNMR methods, 1H–1H 2DNOESY and1H–1H 2D ROESY. Figure shows the 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectra of MK-2 in d6-DMSO and portions of the spectrum in d5-pyridine. Figure A shows the complete 1H–1H 2DNOESY spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO and Figure B–C shows zoomed in regions of interest in the NOESY and ROESY
spectra collected in d6-DMSO, respectively
(see Figures S3–S4 for full spectra). Figure D–F shows
zoomed in regions of interest in the NOESY and ROESY spectra collected
in d5-pyridine, respectively (see Figures S6–S7 for full spectra). Figure B,D illustrates that
MK-2alkene protons, Hh and Hi, are in similar
environments in d5-pyridine andd6-DMSOdue to the observance of similar NOE
cross peaks. In both solvents, Figure B,D shows NOE cross peaks illustrating that Hh and Hi interact with Hn/Hm, Hq, Hr, and Hz. Figure B,D shows NOE cross peaks demonstrating proton
Hw interacts with protons Hh/Hi and
Hm/Hn in both d6-DMSO andd5-pyridine. Figure C,E shows partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectra where the focus is on
proton Hw in d6-DMSO andd5-pyridine (see Figures S4 and S7 for full spectra and Figure S9 for NOE/ROE correlation traces (slices)). Figure B–C shows partial spectra for MK-2
in d6-DMSO, where NOE and ROE cross peaks
indicate the Hw proton interacts with Hq, Hr, Hx, and Hy. However, the lack of ROE
cross peaks in Figure E shows Hw does not interact with Hy or Hz in d5-pyridine (observed cross
peaks between Hw and Hy or Hz in d5-pyridine are likely due to TOCSY exchange).
The observation of cross peaks shows that there are similar interactions
between the aromatic andalkene protons in the two solvents; however,
there is a twist around the C–C bond leading to closer proximity
of the Hw with the Hq, Hr, H, and Hy protons in d6-DMSO. The NOE and ROE cross peaks in the d6-DMSO spectrum in Figure clearly support a folded, U-shaped conformation for
MK-2 in d6-DMSO. However, evidence of
a folded conformation for MK-2 is not as definitive in d5-pyridinedue to the lack of NOE and ROE cross peaks
between Hw and Hy or Hz. If MK-2did adopt a U-shaped conformation in d5-pyridine, it would have a conformation as shown in Figure B, where the distance between
Hw and Hy/Hz is beyond observation
in the 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR experiment.
This conformation for MK-2 in d5-pyridine
is based on other NOE/ROE cross peaks observed (i.e., Hw to Hh, Hw to Hq or Hr, Hw to H). Figure F illustrates π–π
stacking between pyridine and part of the napthoquinone ring, which
could possibly explain the lack of interaction between Hw and Hy or Hz.
Figure 3
1H–1H 2D
NOESY and 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR (400 MHz)
spectra of 20 mM MK-2 in d6-DMSO and d5-pyridine
at 26 °C. (A) Full 1H–1H 2D NOESY
NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (B) Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (C) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (D) Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY
NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d5-pyrdine. (E)
Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of
MK-2 in d5-pyrdine. (F) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d5-pyridine illustrating stacking interactions. Blue intensity
contours represent negative NOE’s or ROE’s, and red
intensity contours represent positive NOE’s or ROE’s.
A standard NOESY pulse sequence was used consisting of 200–256
transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 500 ms mixing time
and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. A standard ROESYAD pulse sequence was
used consisting of 200 or 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain
using a 400 ms mixing time and a 2.0 s relaxation delay. The structure
of MK-2 is shown with a proton labeling scheme key. Green arrows indicate
proton Hw, where the observed cross peaks differed the
most between the two solvents studied.
Figure 4
MK-2 conformations generated using MMFF94 calculations to illustrate
the conformations elucidated by the 2D NMR studies. (A) Illustrates
the MK-2 conformation in d6-DMSO determined
from 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral
data cross peak interactions (66.8 kcal/mol, and internuclear distance
Hw–Hy: 2.6 Å). (B) Illustrates a
potential U-shaped MK-2 conformation in d5-pyridine consistent with the 1H–1H
2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data cross peak interactions (66.7
kcal/mol, and internuclear distance Hw–Hy: 6.1 Å). See Supporting Information for a table of selected proton to proton distances for conformations
A and B.
1H–1H 2DNOESY and1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR (400 MHz)
spectra of 20 mM MK-2 in d6-DMSO andd5-pyridine
at 26 °C. (A) Full 1H–1H 2DNOESY
NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (B) Partial 1H–1H 2DNOESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (C) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d6-DMSO. (D) Partial 1H–1H 2DNOESY
NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d5-pyrdine. (E)
Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of
MK-2 in d5-pyrdine. (F) Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in d5-pyridine illustrating stacking interactions. Blue intensity
contours represent negative NOE’s or ROE’s, and red
intensity contours represent positive NOE’s or ROE’s.
A standardNOESY pulse sequence was used consisting of 200–256
transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 500 ms mixing time
and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. A standard ROESYAD pulse sequence was
used consisting of 200 or 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain
using a 400 ms mixing time and a 2.0 s relaxation delay. The structure
of MK-2 is shown with a proton labeling scheme key. Green arrows indicate
proton Hw, where the observed cross peaks differed the
most between the two solvents studied.MK-2 conformations generated using MMFF94 calculations to illustrate
the conformations elucidated by the 2DNMR studies. (A) Illustrates
the MK-2 conformation in d6-DMSOdetermined
from 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral
data cross peak interactions (66.8 kcal/mol, and internuclear distance
Hw–Hy: 2.6 Å). (B) Illustrates a
potential U-shapedMK-2 conformation in d5-pyridine consistent with the 1H–1H
2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data cross peak interactions (66.7
kcal/mol, and internuclear distance Hw–Hy: 6.1 Å). See Supporting Information for a table of selected proton to proton distances for conformations
A and B.
Illustrating MK-2 Conformations
using Molecular Mechanics
MK-2 has a short repeating isoprenyl
chain (C10) but
contains enough carbons to produce numerous degrees of rotational
freedom; therefore, even the truncated version of MK, MK-2, can assume
many different conformations. Using molecular mechanics calculations,
we explored the energy surface and visualized specific conformations
defined by the 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY
NMR experiments of MK-2 in d6-DMSO andd5-pyridine. Specific conformations were generated
based on distances imposed by the NMR data and then energy optimized
to produce realistic bond lengths and angles for these conformations.
Finally, an energy was calculated to ensure that the conformation
was at a reasonable energy. Longer calculations generally lead to
rotations around bonds and conformations not exactly as those suggested
from the NMR data (see below and Supporting Information). The intent with the molecular mechanics calculations was to illustrate
conformations corresponding to the 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data in d6-DMSO andd5-pyridine constrained
by all cross peak interactions observed as well as to provide visual
aids (Figure ). One
of the low-energy conformations generated for MK-2 has a conformation
(Figure A, 66.8 kcal/mol,
Hw–Hy: 2.6 Å) consistent with the
2DNOESY and ROESY spectral parameters observed in d6-DMSO. Figure B illustrates a potential conformation of MK-2 that is consistent
with the 2DNOESY and ROESY spectral parameters observed in d5-pyridine (66.7 kcal/mol, Hw–Hy: 6.1 Å). See Table S1 for
selected proton to proton distances for conformations seen in Figure A–B consistent
with the 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral parameters. The MK-2 conformation
determined in d6-DMSO adopts a folded,
U-shaped conformation.Fewer NOE and ROE cross peaks were observed
in d5-pyridine that would indicate a folded
conformation, and although this does not preclude a U-shaped conformation,
it does suggest that the Hw–Hy internuclear
distance is longer and outside the observable range using the 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR experiment.
We based this folded conformation off other NOE and ROE cross peaks
observed, which were suggestive of folding (see Figure and relateddiscussion). However, a U-shaped
conformation has been observed by NMR analysis in another aromatic
solvent, d6-benzene, for n-dodecane.[34] The U-shaped conformations
shown in Figure are
representative of many possible stable conformations MK-2 could adopt.
For comparison, Figure S12C shows another
favorable conformation for MK-2 that has a characteristic U-shape.
The energy of the conformation C shown in Figure S12C was the lowest energy we found. This conformation was
obtained by subjecting an extendedMK-2 conformation to 10,000 iterations
followed by an energy minimization, illustrating that nonextended
conformations are readily reached and energetically favorable.Combined, the stability of the U-shaped conformations shown by
these simple calculations is in line with work reported that showed1HNMR spectra of n-pentane andn-hexane measured in polar and spherical solvents such as DMSO favor gauche conformations as well as the reported U-shaped conformations
of alkyl chains bound to synthetic receptors.[39,40,47] The folded conformations for MK-2demonstrated
herein from experiments align with reported computationally determined
conformations for MK analogs.[48] However,
it is contrary to the general expectation that the all-trans conformations of alkanes or alkyl components are the most stable.[7,23,24,28]In addition to the U-shaped conformations seen in conformations
A and B in Figure , a series of alternative conformations of MK-2 (Figure S12D–E) were also generated from the structures
most often depicted by representations in the literature and then
were energy optimized. Conformations D–H in Figure S12 were generated to compare these conformations energetically
to the two U-shaped conformations shown in Figure A–B. The energies of conformations
D–H in Figure S12 were all higher
(∼11 to ∼23 kcal/mol) than the conformations found in d6-DMSO, d5-pyridine,
and conformation C (Figure S12). Additional
analysis of conformations and a table of selected internuclear distances
of MK-2 conformations from Figure and Figure S12 are given in Table S1.Selected simple alkanes and a few other, more complex
compounds
with long alkyl-segments such as in polyenes andfatty acids report
that the extended and folded forms are comparable in energy to the
all-trans form.[29,30] The “pentane
effect” for longer chains destabilizes the gauche conformations because of unfavorable g+g– arrangements, which increases the energy by ∼0.55 kcal/mol
with each kink in the chain.[29,30] In contrast, gauche arrangements are often energetically favored because
of entropic contributions.[31,32] This is in part due
to the spatial requirements that all molecules exert and can be justified
using limited sphere considerations.[33]Gauche arrangements tend to favor folded conformations where
the degree of folding of n-alkanes (C5–C32) in solution depends on the strength of the
dispersion force of the solvent[35] and the
degree of folding increases with increasing chain length of the solute.[34,36] Other molecules that contain alkyl chains such as fatty acids andpolyethylenederivatives have also been reported as either extended
chains or in folded conformations depending on physical and environmental
conditions.[31,32,37,38] Conformational analysis of long chain allylic
polyunsaturated fatty acid chains using Hartree–Fock calculations
showed that conformational differences between the all-trans and helical folded structures are only a few kcal/mol.[37] Ultimately, there are a few but strongly convincing
examples[30,39−42] that folded and/or U-shaped conformations
are likely to become much more important than have been recognized
previously. The studies presented herein represent a new class of
compounds that adopt a U-shaped conformation, illustrating that these
folded conformations are likely to be important and may impact the
biological function of these lipoquinone systems. It is very important
to recognize the molecular plasticity, which allows the alkyl chain
to assume shapes depending on the complementary structures or influences
of the immediately surrounding environment.
Electrochemistry of MK-2
in Different Solvents
Our
interest in these systems relates to the fact that the redox potential
of MK is important in shuttling electrons between protein complexes.
Although the focus of this manuscript has been on the conformations
of these compounds, we are particularly interested in redox properties
because we are aiming to investigate the function of these systems
as well. For MKs to carry out this process, MKs must associate with
the transmembrane proteins involved in the electron-transfer processes.[49] The electron-transfer processes all take place
within or near the membrane interface with two one electron reduction
processes sequentially forming the radical anion (semiquinone) and
then the dianion.[50−52] Even though there has been many reports in literature
on the redox potentials of MK derivatives, the origin of these changes
is not well understood.[50−52] These processes are particularly
poorly understood when the quinones are present in a hydrophobic molecule
that is entirely or partly located in the membrane of a biological
system. Although, it is premature to correlate conformation with redox
potential, we are seeking systematic information where redox potentials
and conformations are known (i.e., within different organic solvents)
and the electrochemical data on this system becomes an important frame
of reference because the conformational analysis has been carried
out. We hypothesized that the redox potential of MK-2 will vary based
on organic solvent environment.Although this hypothesis would
be anticipated to be confirmed, it is important to measure how and
if the magnitude of the redox potential changes as the solvent environment
changes because the function of MK-2 is tied to the redox potentials.
Initially, redox studies were planned to be carried out in DMSO, acetonitrile,
andbenzene; however, because of low solubility of all of the electrolytes
examined in benzene, benzene was replaced with pyridine as a representative
aromatic solvent.[53] The electrolyte tetrabutylammonium
perchlorate (TBAP) was chosen because 1D1HNMR studies
showed that the addition of TBAP to MK-2 solutions (solvents: d6-DMSO, d5-pyridine, d3-acetonitrile) did not affect the observed
chemical shifts of the MK-2 protons, and thus no evidence for artifacts
due to ion pairing would be observed (see Supporting Information for further description of the electrochemical
analysis, and see Figure S13 for MK-2/TBAPNMR studies).MK-2’s first electrochemical potential
is the one electron
reduction of the quinone to semiquinone (Q/Q•–), and the second is the one electron reduction of the semiquinone
to the dianion (Q•–/Q2–), Scheme S1.[50−52] The cyclic
voltammogram’s (CVs) of MK-2 and an internal standard of ferrocene
(Fc+/Fc) in three organic solvents are shown in Figure . The Q/Q•–E1/2 vs Fc+/Fc for MK-2 in
DMSO, CH3CN, andpyridine were measured to be −1.155
(±0.001) V, −1.230 (±0.003) V, and −1.331
(±0.001) V, respectively. As shown in Figure , we included the Fc+/Fc reference
in the data presented. These results are consistent with Q/Q•–E1/2 vs Fc+/Fc values given
for 1,4-naphthoquinone.[50,54] The values determined
experimentally for Q•–/Q2–E1/2 vs Fc+/Fc for MK-2 in
DMSO, CH3CN, andpyridine were measured to be −1.863
(±0.008) V, −1.902 (±0.012) V, and −2.075
(±0.003) V, respectively (Table S2). In Figure , the
half-wave potentials are plotted showing the trend that both redox
processes are more readily reduced in DMSO than CH3CN or
pyridine similar to the trend observed in literature for 1,4-napthoquinone
potentials.[54]
Figure 5
Three representative
CVs of 2 mM MK-2 in CH3CN, DMSO,
and pyridine. The potentials are referenced to the Fc+/Fc
couple (2 mM) determined in each solvent. From left to right, redox
processes are Q•–/Q2–,
Q/Q•–, and Fc+/Fc. Each sample
has 0.1 M TBAP and was degassed with argon gas for 10 min at ambient
room temperature before spectra were recorded. Current sweeps are
in the anodic direction from −2 V to 1 V and back to −2
V. A 100 mV scan rate was used.
Figure 6
Measured E1/2 (vs Fc+/Fc
in V) of MK-2 Q/Q•– and Q•–/Q2– redox processes vs solvent. Added lines show
the distinction between each solvent for each redox process. Each
solvent was run in triplicate with error bars shown. Student’s t test indicated the half wave potentials of each redox
process are significantly different in each solvent (p < 0.01 for Q•–/Q2– CH3CN-DMSO and p < 0.0001 for all
other comparisons). See Supporting Information for details.
Three representative
CVs of 2 mM MK-2 in CH3CN, DMSO,
andpyridine. The potentials are referenced to the Fc+/Fc
couple (2 mM) determined in each solvent. From left to right, redox
processes are Q•–/Q2–,
Q/Q•–, and Fc+/Fc. Each sample
has 0.1 M TBAP and was degassed with argon gas for 10 min at ambient
room temperature before spectra were recorded. Current sweeps are
in the anodic direction from −2 V to 1 V and back to −2
V. A 100 mV scan rate was used.Measured E1/2 (vs Fc+/Fc
in V) of MK-2 Q/Q•– and Q•–/Q2– redox processes vs solvent. Added lines show
the distinction between each solvent for each redox process. Each
solvent was run in triplicate with error bars shown. Student’s t test indicated the half wave potentials of each redox
process are significantly different in each solvent (p < 0.01 for Q•–/Q2– CH3CN-DMSO and p < 0.0001 for all
other comparisons). See Supporting Information for details.In summary, during the
first electrochemical process producing
the semiquinone, MK-2 has the most positive potential in DMSO and
the most negative potential in pyridine, showing MK-2 is slightly
more reducible in DMSO than pyridine or CH3CN. The observation
of differing redox potentials between organic solvents supports the
second hypothesis that the redox potential of MK-2 is influenced by
the specific organic solvent, where a contributing factor to the observed
changes is due to the differences between the dielectric constant
of each solvent. The different organic solvents influence the observed
redox potential of MK-2, and from the 2DNMR studies on the conformation
of MK-2, slight differences in conformation were observed, which may
suggest that a combination of solvent effect and conformational differences
of MK-2 may affect the redox potential.
Interaction of Langmuir
Phospholipid Monolayers with MK-2
The physiologically relevant
environment for MKs is in association
with membranes; therefore, we also studied the interaction of MK-2
with a more direct model membrane interface, a phospholipid monolayer.
Several membrane models exist including Langmuir phospholipid monolayers,
liposomes, micelles, and reverse micelles (RM) (Figure ).[55−61] Each model system has advantages anddisadvantages, and we have
chosen to investigate the phospholipid monolayer because of MKs direct
association with a membrane and the RM system because RMs allow for
the determination of molecular placement and conformation of MK-2
within the interface.[55−61]
Figure 7
Schematic
diagram of (A) a Langmuir phospholipid monolayer and
(B) a RM present in a microemulsion. Labeling for the RM is as follows:
the water pool (A), the Stern layer (B), the surfactant tails (C),
and the organic solvent, isooctane (D).
Schematic
diagram of (A) a Langmuir phospholipid monolayer and
(B) a RM present in a microemulsion. Labeling for the RM is as follows:
the water pool (A), the Stern layer (B), the surfactant tails (C),
and the organic solvent, isooctane (D).First, we describe our studies with Langmuir phospholipid
monolayers[60,61] consisting of phospholipids to
gain insight into the interactions
between two classes of phospholipids (dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine
(DPPC) or dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DPPE)) and MK derivatives.
These studies will demonstrate how the phospholipid packing is affected
by the presence of MK derivatives as it interacts with the phospholipid
interface (Figure A).[60,62−65] Due to the low solubility of
MK-2 in aqueous environments, the Langmuir phospholipid monolayer
studies involve experimental protocols used for other materials with
low solubility in water, such as UBQ.[66,67]Figure shows the change in surface
pressure as a function of area per molecule of DPPC or DPPE in the
presence of various amounts of MK-2. The resulting compression moduli
as functions of surface pressure are shown in Figure S14.
Figure 8
Compression isotherms of MK-2 films (dotted lines), DPPC
or DPPE
phospholipid films (solid lines), or a 50:50 mixture of MK-2 and phospholipid
(dashed line). On the left (A) are the resulting compression isotherms
of MK-2 and DPPC, while on the right (B) are the resulting compression
isotherms of MK-2 and DPPE.
Compression isotherms of MK-2 films (dotted lines), DPPC
or DPPEphospholipid films (solid lines), or a 50:50 mixture of MK-2 andphospholipid
(dashed line). On the left (A) are the resulting compression isotherms
of MK-2 andDPPC, while on the right (B) are the resulting compression
isotherms of MK-2 andDPPE.The compression isotherm of DPPC shows a transition at ∼8
mN/m and both DPPC andDPPE collapse at ∼55 mN/m similar to
findings reported in literature.[68] The
compression isotherm of the 1:1 mixture of DPPC andMK-2 shows a disappearance
of the gas to liquid phase transition at 8 mN/m, suggesting there
is a condensing effect of MK-2 with DPPC at a high area per molecule/low
surface pressure. Moving to DPPE, the 1:1 mixture of MK-2 with DPPE
reduces the collapse pressure of the film to 50 mN/m, showing destabilization
of the DPPE film. The pure MK-2 films had limited stability shown
by a maximum surface pressure of ∼20 mN/m. This result suggests
MK-2 forms a less stable film than the phospholipids.[66−68] To understand the interactions of MK-2 with DPPE andDPPC further,
the compression moduli were calculated using equation 4 (see Supporting Information), where the compression
modulus is the measure of the compressibility of the film.Our
results are interpreted as MK-2 having a condensing effect
on DPPC phospholipid films at high area per molecule/low pressure
anddestabilization of DPPE phospholipid films. The resulting mixed
films (DPPC/MK-2 or DPPE/MK-2) were also consistent with reportedUBQ, suggesting similar trends where UBQ was shown to be compressed
out of the phospholipid interface.[66,67,69] In summary, MK-2 has a condensing effect on DPPCphospholipid films, a destabilization of DPPE phospholipid films,
and is most likely compressed out of the phospholipid film similar
to UBQ.[66,67,69] Unfortunately,
these studies do not directly show whether a folded or extended conformation
of MK-2 exists. A folded conformation occupies a larger volume than
the extended conformation, which would affect packing within the phospholipid
interface. Our studies do demonstrate that MK-2 interacts with the
phospholipid model membrane interfaces of DPPC andDPPE even above
physiologically relevant pressures. It is possible that the observation
of the destabilization of the DPPE phospholipid films (not observed
for DPPC) by the presence of the MK may suggest a foldedMK-2 conformation
that does not fit in the organization of the DPPE film (possibly related
to packing of the phospholipid).
1D 1H NMR Spectroscopic
Studies of MK-2 in RMs
Our ultimate objective was to characterize
the molecular details
of MK-2’s association with membrane-like interfaces. This characterization
includes determining the location and conformation of MK-2; therefore,
the RM model system was investigated (Figure B).[60,62−65,70] In the RM, a ternary microemulsion
system forms when a surfactant is dissolved in an organic solvent
and the addition of water creates nanosizedwaterdroplets encased
in surfactant.[56,63,65,70−72] This dynamic, yet simple,
model can provide molecular detail on location and conformation of
MK at an interface using NMR spectroscopy, whereas the use of phospholipids
such as DPPC can have overlapping proton signals with key MK proton
signals making interpreting conformational information very complex.[70,73−76] RM systems provide information regarding the location, conformation,
and physical interactions of MK with lipid films and potentially membranes,
which allowed us to examine our third hypothesis that the membrane
interface influences the conformation of the MK derivative.To explore the location of MK-2 at a lipid/water interface further,
studies were conducted using a simple microemulsion interfacial system,
which allows for identification of molecular placement. Figure shows a stack plot of 1D1HNMR spectra for the aromatic protons (Ha/Hb and Hc/Hd) of MK-2 in solutions of
D2O, isooctane, or isooctane solutions of MK-2 containing
RMs (D2O/AOT/isooctane microemulsions) of various sizes
(w0: 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20, where w0 = [D2O]/[AOT]) and for comparison
with an empty AOT/isooctane RM. The aromatic MK-2 protons in the AOT/isooctane
RMs are similar to the signals observed in isooctane but very different
from the signals observed in D2O. The distance between
Ha/Hb and Hc/Hd is 0.52
ppm in isooctane, 0.47 ppm in the RM, and 0.27 ppm in D2O. This suggests that the environment of the MK-2 protons in the
AOT/isooctane RMs is more like an environment in isooctane than D2O, where MK-2 is no longer in isooctane but associating with
the AOT molecules. The signals from the Hc/Hd protons in the AOT/isooctane RMs do change slightly as the RM size
increase or decreases. This observation is also consistent with MK-2
penetrating and residing in the interface.
Figure 9
1D 1H NMR
(400 MHz) spectra of MK-2’s aromatic
protons, Ha, Hb, Hc, and Hd in D2O, isooctane, and different sized RMs. Proton peak
text labeling corresponds to MK-2 proton labeling scheme key found
in Figure . Ha, Hb, Hc, and Hd protons
undergo a chemical shift upon inclusion inside RMs.
1D1HNMR
(400 MHz) spectra of MK-2’s aromatic
protons, Ha, Hb, Hc, and Hd in D2O, isooctane, anddifferent sized RMs. Proton peak
text labeling corresponds to MK-2 proton labeling scheme key found
in Figure . Ha, Hb, Hc, and Hd protons
undergo a chemical shift upon inclusion inside RMs.To verify that the RMs formed in the samples used
and that the
properties of the samples are consistent with previous studies,[61,63,70,77,78] dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments
were carried out. These studies confirmed the formation of RMs, and
that the RM did not change significantly upon the addition of MK-2.
This was carried out by measuring the sizes in the presence and absence
of MK-2 and confirming that the size was as those reported previously
(data not shown).[63] Overall, these results
are consistent with MK-2 penetrating the RM model membrane interface;
however, 2D studies are described below to get more information regarding
the placement and conformation of MK-2 within the RM system.
1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR Spectroscopic
Studies of MK-2 in a RM Model Membrane System
To provide
further evidence regarding the location, orientation, and conformation
of MK-2 within RMs, we obtained the 1H–1H 2DNOESY NMR spectrum and the 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum of MK-2 in a w 12 RM, Figures and 11. Figure shows a partial 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectra indicating both AOT andMK-2
protons, whereas Figure focused in on selected proton interactions specifically in
the NOESY spectrum (see Figures S10–S11 for full spectra). Figure A shows cross peaks between the aromatic Ha/Hb and Hc/Hd and parts of the AOT CH2 and CH3 tail groups (i.e., H8′ and H10′
protons, see Figure for AOT proton labeling key). Figure B shows cross peaks between alkene protons,
Hi and Hh, with HOD andAOT’s H1, H1′,
H3, and H3′ protons and only evidence of a weak interaction
between MK-2 andisooctane. These interactions are consistent with
placement of MK-2 between the AOT tails, as shown using a depth perception
drawing in Figure .
Figure 10
Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR
(400 MHz) spectra of MK-2 inside w0 12
RM at 26 °C. (A) Partial 1H–1H 2D
NOESY NMR spectrum in a w 12 RM. (B)
Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum in
a w 12 RM. Blue to blue proton text
labeling shows MK-2 to MK-2 interactions, teal to teal proton text
labeling shows AOT to AOT interactions, and blue to teal proton text
labeling shows MK-2 to AOT interactions. Blue intensity contours represent
negative NOE’s or ROE’s and red intensity contours represent
positive NOE’s or ROE’s. A standard NOESY pulse sequence
was used consisting of 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain
using a 200 ms mixing time and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. A standard
ROESYAD pulse sequence was used consisting of 256 transients with
16 scans in the f1 domain using a 200 ms mixing time and a 2.0 s relaxation
delay. See Figure for MK-2 proton labeling scheme key and Figure for AOT proton labeling scheme key.
Figure 11
Partial 1H–1H 2D NOESY NMR (400 MHz)
spectra of MK-2 inside a w 12 RM at 26
°C illustrating interactions of MK-2 with the AOT surfactant
tails. (A) Interactions between MK-2’s aromatic protons and
AOT. (B) Interactions between MK-2 alkene protons and AOT. The blue
to blue proton text labeling shows MK-2 to MK-2 interactions, teal
to teal proton text labeling shows AOT to AOT interactions, and blue
to teal proton text labeling shows MK-2 to AOT interactions. Blue
intensity contours represent negative NOE’s, and red intensity
contours represent positive NOE’s. A standard NOESY pulse sequence
was used consisting of 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain
using a 200 ms mixing time and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. See Figure for MK-2 proton
labeling scheme key and Figure for AOT proton labeling scheme key.
Figure 12
Illustration of MK-2’s proposed folded, U-shaped
conformation
and placement in the RM interface. This arrangement is consistent
with 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral
data obtained in a w 12 RM; however,
MK-2 likely tumbles freely within the interface but maintains interactions
with the region of AOT shown in the illustration. Color depth fading
legend shows dark red as closer in distance and dark blue as farther
in distance from the reader. AOT proton labeling scheme key is shown.
Partial 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR
(400 MHz) spectra of MK-2 inside w0 12
RM at 26 °C. (A) Partial 1H–1H 2DNOESY NMR spectrum in a w 12 RM. (B)
Partial 1H–1H 2D ROESY NMR spectrum in
a w 12 RM. Blue to blue proton text
labeling shows MK-2 to MK-2 interactions, teal to teal proton text
labeling shows AOT to AOT interactions, and blue to teal proton text
labeling shows MK-2 to AOT interactions. Blue intensity contours represent
negative NOE’s or ROE’s and red intensity contours represent
positive NOE’s or ROE’s. A standardNOESY pulse sequence
was used consisting of 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain
using a 200 ms mixing time and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. A standard
ROESYAD pulse sequence was used consisting of 256 transients with
16 scans in the f1 domain using a 200 ms mixing time and a 2.0 s relaxation
delay. See Figure for MK-2 proton labeling scheme key and Figure for AOT proton labeling scheme key.Partial 1H–1H 2DNOESY NMR (400 MHz)
spectra of MK-2 inside a w 12 RM at 26
°C illustrating interactions of MK-2 with the AOT surfactant
tails. (A) Interactions between MK-2’s aromatic protons andAOT. (B) Interactions between MK-2alkene protons andAOT. The blue
to blue proton text labeling shows MK-2 to MK-2 interactions, teal
to teal proton text labeling shows AOT to AOT interactions, and blue
to teal proton text labeling shows MK-2 to AOT interactions. Blue
intensity contours represent negative NOE’s, and red intensity
contours represent positive NOE’s. A standardNOESY pulse sequence
was used consisting of 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain
using a 200 ms mixing time and a 1.5 s relaxation delay. See Figure for MK-2 proton
labeling scheme key and Figure for AOT proton labeling scheme key.Illustration of MK-2’s proposed folded, U-shaped
conformation
and placement in the RM interface. This arrangement is consistent
with 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral
data obtained in a w 12 RM; however,
MK-2 likely tumbles freely within the interface but maintains interactions
with the region of AOT shown in the illustration. Color depth fading
legend shows dark red as closer in distance anddark blue as farther
in distance from the reader. AOT proton labeling scheme key is shown.Regarding the conformation of
MK-2 associated with the RM–water
interface, the NOE and ROE cross peaks in Figure show interactions between Hw and Hz/Hy and between Hw and the
alkene protons, Hh/Hi, which is consistent with
a folded, U-shaped conformation. In the proposed conformation, the
C2–C6 atom to atom distance in MK-2’s isoprenyl side-chain
was found to be 3.6 Å, which is consistent with a U-shape (g+g– conformation, Figure ) for MK-2 placed at the RM interface (see Supporting Information for further discussion
and internuclear distances of different MK-2 conformations). An illustration
of an MK-2 conformation consistent with these observations is shown
in Figure . This
U-shaped conformation observed when MK-2 is associated within the
RMs changed slightly from that observed in d6-DMSO regarding where the double bond overlaps with the napthoquinone
moiety. The overlap of the alkene andnapthoquinone functionalities
in the conformation associated with the interface is best illustrated
by the top view in Figure B. Importantly, the U-shape fold remains, but slight rotation
around the C–C bond facilitates the conformational changes
in the U-shape.
Figure 13
MK-2 conformation at an interface visualized using MMFF94
calculations.
Molecular mechanics simulations generating the 3D conformation of
MK-2 in a RM that is consistent with 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data. (A) Side view of energy minimized
conformation (63.5 kcal/mol, and internuclear distance Hw–Hz: 4.0 Å) showing MK-2’s isoprene
side-chain adopting a hook-like shape also known as a folded, U-shaped
conformation. (B) Top view of energy minimized conformation showing
the terminal isoprene methyl groups overlapping the carbonyl groups
on the napthoquinone.
MK-2 conformation at an interface visualized using MMFF94
calculations.
Molecular mechanics simulations generating the 3D conformation of
MK-2 in a RM that is consistent with 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data. (A) Side view of energy minimized
conformation (63.5 kcal/mol, and internuclear distance Hw–Hz: 4.0 Å) showing MK-2’s isoprene
side-chain adopting a hook-like shape also known as a folded, U-shaped
conformation. (B) Top view of energy minimized conformation showing
the terminal isoprene methyl groups overlapping the carbonyl groups
on the napthoquinone.
Implications of Folded Conformations for MK Derivatives
Natural MKs contain a naphthoquinone and an isoprenyl side-chain
with some variable number of repeating isoprene units, where MKs support
the electron-transfer reactions in a range of systems.[6,43] MK-2 was synthesized allowing for detailed characterization of the
molecule. The results presented herein for MK-2 suggests that other
important MK derivatives in biology will adopt folded conformations
as well anddemonstrates the need to prepare and study such derivatives
both experimentally and computationally.The extended conformations
of long chain biological molecules such as fatty acids andpolyenes
are generally shown in the literature if the structure is presented.[7,23,24] However, a few studies of isoprene
conformers and1,3 acyclic dienes show the extended trans alkane conformations compare in energy with folded or helical conformations.[79,80] Although the folded conformations in those studies may be slightly
higher in energy than unfolded conformations, the difference is surprisingly
small. The C–C single bond lengths reported for stearic aciddecreases under high pressure.[42] These
bond shrinkages cause conformational and shape changes in stearic
acid favoring folded conformations.[42] Previous
studies using high-temperature UV-absorption spectroscopy, molecular
orbital calculations, and gas-phase electron diffraction found that
isoprene andchloroprene conformations did, in fact, favor folded
conformations.[81,82] Although these conditions are
nonphysiological, they do demonstrate that changes in a physical parameter
can affect the preferred conformation. Previous work has been carried
out with fatty acids where the experimental studies showed that the
conformations of the alkane portion of the fatty acids can anddo
change similar to conformations of MK-2 as shown in this work.[37] Our studies confirm the first hypothesis that
MKs have different conformations depending on specific environmental
conditions, which was achieved by first synthesizing MK-2 and then
demonstrating that a U-shaped, folded conformation was adopted in d6-DMSO, which was different from the conformation
in d5-pyridine.Conformations can
affect reactivity, and as in this case, the electron-transfer
reactions facilitated by MK. MK forms complexes with several enzymes
during the electron-transfer processes, and although kinetic characterizations
of these systems have been reported,[83−85] less is known structurally.
The redox potentials of MK-2depicted in Figure illustrate the trend where the most positive
potential is in DMSO and the most negative potential is in pyridine,
which agrees with literature reports on menadione.[50,54] These results have identified that the redox potential of MK-2 changes
as a function of solvent, and the origin of this change (presumably
in part due to a change in dielectric constant between solvents) and
whether these observed solvent effects can be associated with changes
in conformation should be investigated in the future using both suitable
high-level computational methods as well as electrochemistry. Indeed,
the change in redox potential is likely to be important, and since
there is no conjugation between the isoprenyl side-chain andnapthoquinone,
these effects are very interesting and may reflect that the energy
required for the reduction is determined by the energy difference
of the HOMO–LUMO gap in the two different conformations.[86] Orbital analysis of the HOMO–LUMO gap
could potentially be informative anddescribe the origin of the observed
varied biological effects of a series of N-alkyl
MK derivatives that have been reported.[87,88] For example,
replacement of a CH2 group with a N atom modifies the parent
system, creating a class of compounds with a nitrogen bounddirectly
to the “naphthoquinone group.” These molecules have
dramatically different biological properties than the parent MK derivatives,[87,88] and it is possible that these activities could be related to the
change in fundamental physical and chemical properties that occurs
with N-alkyl isoprenoid substitution of the naphthoquinone
ring. Combined, these results confirm the second hypothesis that the
redox potential of MK-2 is influenced by organic solvent environment
(in part due to dielectric constant of solvent), which is likely to
be important for understanding the mechanistic details in MK metabolism.The third hypothesis involves determining if the association of
MK with the membrane interface influences the conformation of the
MK derivative. We investigated the interaction of MK-2 with a phospholipid
Langmuir monolayer, which is a simple 2D model of a single leaflet
of a cell membrane.[59,89,90] The fact that MK-2 interacts with the phospholipid monolayer is
consistent with the expected MK affinity for the hydrophobic phospholipids
that make up the cell membrane. Langmuir monolayer studies support
interaction of MK-2 with the phospholipid monolayer interface; however,
the lipoquinone is likely compressed out of the interfacial portion
of the phospholipid monolayer into the more hydrophobic alkyl tail
groups on the top of the monolayer as the pressure increases. Unfortunately,
Langmuir phospholipid monolayer studies could not determine the conformation
of MK-2; however, the RM surfactant interface complements studies
with the phospholipid monolayer interface. The question of folding
was further investigated by combining 1HNMR spectroscopic
studies of MK-2 in organic solution and in a simple model membrane
system, RMs. The conformation of MK-2 was characterized in organic
solvents and was found to differ slightly from the conformation when
it was associated with the surfactant interface within RMs. It is
to be expected that MK-2 would have an affinity for the interface
because of its hydrophobicity, which agrees with results observed
in the RM system. The RM interface is known to be penetrated by water
molecules and thus less packed than a biological membrane and, therefore,
has a lower interface pressure meaning MK-2 is unlikely to be compressed
out once inside.[63,70,91] The 1HNMR spectroscopic studies in RMs allowed us to
observe the association of MK-2 with the interface molecules as well
as with itself in its folded state. The 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral data indicate that the U-shaped
conformation of MK-2 (Figure ) remained intact while associating with the RM model membrane
interface; however, the overlap between the alkene and the napthoquinone
varies with the specific environment. The small changes in the U-shaped
conformation document the environmental influence on the conformational
folding of MK-2. These results are very important because they document
the possibility that MK derivatives in the cell membrane environment
may be folded, and if so, such folds will impact the interaction with
proteins in the ETS and affect reactivity and function.Naturally
occurring lipoquinones are characterized by the presence
of an isoprenyl side-chain of varying length depending on the species
of origin. MK-2’s isoprenyl side-chain is shorter than most
lipoquinones involved in electron transport; therefore, it may not
fully mimic the interactions generated by MK derivatives with longer
isoprene chains with the membrane or the enzyme systems. However,
these results show that the folding of MK-2 is very important and
may suggest that MK derivatives with the longer isoprenyl side-chains
may adopt folded conformations as well. Understanding how MK-2 and
other MK derivatives fold in a hydrophobic environment is critical
to gauge how these molecules will behave within a biological membrane
associated with the ETS.Investigation of the conformation of
a particular MK derivative’s
location and conformation will also allow for a more realistic interpretation
of data obtained with the novel fluorogenic probe, a vitamin K analog,
reported to fluoresce after reduction to the quinol.[92] Studies with this new probe may help provide information
on the role that vitamin K plays in key redox processes. Accurate
information obtained from the use of this probe would provide better
quality data regarding photosynthesis and cellular respiration, and
future consideration of MK derivatives location and conformation will
be important for proper interpretation of the results obtained from
the use of this probe.[92]
Conclusions
Conformations exhibited by alkanes andalkenes are essential for
explaining trends in reactivity and manifestation of physical properties,
but little is understood regarding biological systems with hydrophobic
small components containing alkyl segments. The studies presented
in this manuscript describe the chemical and biochemical properties
of MK, which is an essential component of the ETS in many Gram-positive
bacteria, including pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, and Staphylococcus
aureus, to name a few. We report for the first time in this
class of molecules that MK-2 adopts a folded, U-shaped conformation
in organic solution. The specific nature of the conformation varied
within different organic solvents and thus confirmed our first hypothesis
that MK-2 conformations are very sensitive to their environment. These
findings contrast with the simple, extended conformation represented
in textbooks and the literature that is shown for MK derivatives as
well as the more common “Q”, belonging to the UBQ family
of lipoquinones.The change in the observed redox potentials
of MK-2 with different
organic solvents confirmed our second hypothesis. This is important
for future studies probing the function of the substrate and potential
correlation between conformation and redox potential of MK derivatives,
and although most of the studies in this manuscript are of a structural
nature, it is important to recognize that the function is likely related
to the conformation of the MK-derivative. The discovery that MK-2
adopts a folded conformation may suggest that other MK derivatives
will have similar conformations, which ultimately will impact all
the biological systems in which MKs have a role such as within the
ETS in specific Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. The result of a
stable U-shape conformation in solution and within an interface is
important as little information is available on essential hydrophobic
biological components.Although the NMR spectral data illustrated
using molecular mechanics
allowed for the conclusion that MK-2’s conformation is environment
dependent, it was important to investigate if this U-shaped conformation
remained at a membrane-like interface. We used two membrane model
systems to investigate this question. The more physiologically relevant
DPPC/DPPE phospholipid monolayers confirmed that MK-2 interacted with
the phospholipid interface similar to UBQs; however, the conformation
of MK-2 remainedunspecified. Complementary studies using the AOT-RM
model membrane system alloweddetermination of the molecular location
of MK-2 as penetrating the water–surfactant interface as well
as the conformation of MK-2 within the RM interface. We found that
the folded, U-shaped conformations observed in organic solution remained
upon association with the AOT-RM interface, but the U-shaped conformation
differed slightly indicating the interface’s environmental
influence on conformation. Together, these results support the interpretation
that the MKs conformation remains folded in a U-shape even in contact
with a model membrane interface, which agrees with our third hypothesis.More broadly, the results of this study will also enhance our understanding
of folded conformations for chemically and biologically important
hydrophobic small molecules in solutions and confined hydrophobic
environments. The shape and, thus, the conformation of these molecules
are relevant for molecular recognition motifs and the processing of
these molecules within the membrane. This manuscript represents the
first attempt to characterize the conformation as well as the chemical
and biochemical properties manifested by the conformation of any electron
transferring lipoquinonederivative. Although many studies have been
carried out with these systems kinetically, the conformation and how
this impacts the biological chemistry has not yet been addressed.
Experimental Section
Preparation of (E)-2-(3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl)-3-methylnaphthalene-1,4-dione
(4)
To a 500 mL round-bottom Schlenk flask were
added a stir bar, diethyl ether (100 mL), andmenadione (5.00 g, 29.0
mmol). Then, 10% aq. Na2S2O4 (100
mL, 57.4 mmol) was added, and the solution immediately turneddark
red. After 30 min of stirring at ambient temperature, the solution
was clear yellow. The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with
diethyl ether (3×, 100 mL). The combined organic extracts were
washed with sat. NaHCO3 (100 mL), followed by DDI H2O (100 mL), and last with brine (100 mL). The combined organic
extracts were dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and
then concentrated under reduced pressure at room temperature. The
crude powder was triturated with pentane (50 mL), vacuum filtered,
and washed with pentane (100 mL) to yield 4.25 g as a pale purple
solid. Menadiol formation is indicative by 1HNMR (CDCl3) by the presence of a peak at 6.64 ppm and is consistent
with literature.[93]To a 100 mL round-bottom
Schlenk flask was addedethyl acetate (16 mL) and1,4-dioxane (16
mL), which was purged/evacuated with argon repeatedly. Then, crude
menadiol (2.50 g, 4:1 menadiol:menadione by NMR integration, 11.5
mmol) was added, followed by geraniol (1.92 g, 12.5 mmol), and then
dropwise addition of fresh BF3 etherate (0.8 mL). The solution
was allowed to reflux at 70–72 °C for 3 h under argon.
The dark orange colored reaction mixture was quenched with ice-H2O (100 mL) and then extracted with diethyl ether (3×,
100 mL). The yellow organic extracts were washed with sat. NaHCO3 (100 mL), washed with DDI H2O (100 mL), washed
with brine (100 mL), dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, and then concentrated under reduced pressure at room temperature
to yield 3.71 g of crude red oil. The crude oil was purified by flash
column chromatography (1000 mL of 230–400 mesh SiO2, 70 mm column, 20:1 pentane/ethyl acetate). The yellow oil obtained
was dried under reduced pressure (∼125 mTorr) overnight to
yield 0.713 g (2.31 mmol, 20.1% yield) as a yellow solid. The scale
of this reaction was ∼14 times larger than the previously reported
synthesis.[45]1HNMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ: 7.96–8.01 (m, 2H), 7.80–7.84
(m, 2H), 4.96–5.00 (m,2H), 3.30 (d, 2H, J =
4 Hz), 2.10 (s, 3H), 1.92–2.04 (m, 4H), 1.73 (s, 3H), 1.53
(s, 3H), 1.49 (s, 3H). 13CNMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ: 184.7, 183.6, 145.3, 142.9, 136.4, 133.9,
131.5, 130.7, 125.9, 125.8, 123.9, 119.4, 26.0, 25.4, 25.4, 17.5,
16.1, 12.4. LRMS (ESI 70 eV, EtOAc) m/z: [(M + H)+] Calcd for C21H25O2 309.2; found 309.2. HRMS (ESI, OTOF) m/z: [(M + H)+] Calcd for C21H25O2 309.1849; found 309.1851.
Mass Spectrometry
Low-resolution mass spectrometry
(LRMS) experiments were conducted by electron spray ionization mass
spectrometry (ESI) on an Agilent technologies 6130 Quadrupole LCMS.
High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) experiments were carried
out using an Agilent 6220 TOF LC/MS (“OTOF”) interfaced
to an Agilent 1200 HPLC with electrospray (ESI) mode.
NMR Spectroscopic
Studies
1D and 2D1H studies
were carried out both in organic solvents and more complex media (see
below for RM studies). 1H and13C spectra were
recorded using a Varian Model MR400 or Model Inova400 operating at
400 and 100 MHz, respectively. Chemical shift values (δ) are
reported in ppm and referenced against the internal solvent peaks
in 1HNMR (d6-DMSO, δ
at 2.50 ppm; CDCl3, δ at 7.26 ppm; d5-pyridine, δ at 8.74 ppm; d3-acetonitrile, δ at 1.94 ppm; D2O, δ
at 4.79 ppm; C6D6, δ at 7.16 ppm) and
in 13CNMR (d6-DMSO, δ
at 39.52 ppm). All NMR spectra were recorded at either 22 or 26 °C.
Solution 1D 1H NMR Spectroscopic Studies
Samples
were prepared by dissolving ∼5 mg of MK-2 in either
0.5 mL of isooctane, d5-pyridine, C6D6, d3-acetonitirle, d6-DMSO, or D2O. The MK-2 sample in
D2O was vortexed for ∼1 h to dissolve maximum amount
of MK-2. The NMR spectrum was collected by running 32 scans and was
locked onto the deuterated solvent except for isooctane, which was
ran unlocked using CDCl3 as a spectral window reference.
Sample Preparation for Solution 1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR Spectroscopic Studies
To prepare
the samples in d6-DMSO andd5-pyridine, 0.0031 g of MK-2 was dissolved in 0.5 mL of
solvent to yield a 20 mM solution of MK-2. The NMR tubes containing
the MK-2 solution were purged with argon prior to data collection.
1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR Spectroscopy
in Organic Solution
2DNMR spectroscopic studies in organic
solution were carried out on a Varian model MR400 400 MHz magnet at
26 °C. A standardNOESY pulse sequence was used consisting of
either 200 or 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using
a 500 ms mixing time, 45° pulse angle, and a 1.5 s relaxation
delay. A standard ROESYAD pulse sequence was used consisting of either
200 or 256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 domain using a 400 ms
mixing time, 45° pulse angle, and a 2.0 s relaxation delay. The
NMR was locked onto either d6-DMSO or d5-pyridine and referenced to the internal solvent
peak. The resulting spectrum was processed using MestReNova NMR software
version 10.0.1.
Molecular Mechanics Calculations
To obtain visual aids
of MK-2 conformations, Merck molecular force field 94 (MMFF94) molecular
mechanics gas-phase simulations were conducted using ChemBio3D Ultra
12.0 at 25 °C. Starting conformations were obtained from ChemDraw
structures or by rotating desired bonds and then either had simulations
run or simply an energy minimized to achieve the desired conformation.
Conformations A–B in Figure were generated and then energy minimized with a root-mean-square
(RMS) gradient of 0.1 and up to 50 iterations to obtain conformations
that agreed with our interpretation of the cross peak observations
in the 1H–1H 2DNOESY and ROESY NMR spectral
data. One simulation was run for 10,000 iterations and then energy
minimized using an MMFF94 energy minimization calculation using 500
iterations with a RMS gradient of 0.001 to achieve conformation C
in Figure S12C. Conformations D–H
in Figure S12 were generated by rotating
bonds to achieve the desired conformation followed by an energy minimization
using 20–50 iterations and an RMS gradient of 0.1. A table
of structural parameters such as selecteddistances between hydrogen
atoms within the conformations and energies calculated for the 3D
conformations can be found in the Supporting Information section.
Electrochemistry Methods
All electrochemistry
was performed
on a CHI 750D potentiostat. For the cyclic voltammetry (CV), a classical
three electrode system was used with scan rate of 100 mV/s at 22 °C.
The working electrode was a glassy carbon electrode (BASi MF2012,
3 mm), and the counter electrode was a platinum wire electrode (BASi
MW1032). The Ag+/Ag reference electrode (BASi MW1085) was
constructed by inserting a Ag wire into a freshly prepared solution
of organic solvent (CH3CN, DMSO, or pyridine) with 0.1
M TBAP and 0.01 M AgNO3. Detailed experimental, instrumentation,
and analysis are available in the Supporting Information.
Langmuir Monolayer Compression Isotherms
The subphase
for each experiment consisted of approximately 50 mL of a 20 mM sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The phospholipid solution was prepared
by dissolving powderedphospholipid into a chloroform:methanol (9:1,
v:v) solution to produce 1 mM phospholipid stock solution. The film
applied to the subphase consisted of 20 μL of phospholipid stock
solution or a 50:50 mole fraction mixture of MK-2 with either DPPC
or DPPE. The resulting film was equilibrated for 15 min and then compressed
using a Teflon ribbon at a rate of 10 mm/min (2.4 Å2/chain). The surface pressure was measured using the Wilhemy plate
method where a wire probe was used as the plate on a Kibron μTrough
XS.[94] The reported compression isotherms
are reported as an average of three trials (constructed by averaging
the three isotherms in excel). See Supporting Information for compression modulus data and interpretation.
Sample Preparation for RM NMR Spectroscopic Studies
A 0.50
M AOT stock solution was made by dissolving AOT (5.56 g, 12.5
mmol) in isooctane (25.0 mL). RMs were prepared by mixing the 0.50
M AOT stock solution with D2O (pH 7.0) and then vortexed
until clear. MK-2 RMs were made in a similar manner except an 11.2
mM MK-2 stock solution was prepared by directly dissolving MK-2 in
the 0.50 M AOT/isooctane solution. Then, the MK-2-AOT-isooctane stock
solution along with D2O (pH 7) were used to make RMs.
1D 1H NMR Spectroscopic Studies of AOT/Isooctane
RMs That Contain MK-2
1D1HNMR spectroscopic
experiments were carried out using a Varian Inova 400 MHz instrument
using routine parameters (pulse angle: 45°, relaxation delay
of 1 s) at 22 °C. The RM spectra were internally referenced using
the isooctane methyl peak set to 0.904 ppm.[95] Data analysis and spectrum workup were done using the NMR software,
MestReNova version 10.0.1.
Sample Preparation for 1H–1H 2D
NOESY and ROESY NMR Spectroscopic Studies (RMs)
To prepare
the AOT/isooctane stock solution, 0.22 g AOT (0.50 mmol) was dissolved
into isooctane (1.0 mL) for a final 0.50 M AOT stock solution. Then
0.035 g (1.10 mmol) of MK-2 was dissolved into the 0.50 M AOT stock
solution for a final concentration of 110 mM MK-2. Then, 892.6 μL
of MK-2AOT/isooctane stock solution was mixed with 107.3 μL
of D2O (pH = 7) and then vortexed until clear. This final
mixture results in a w 12 RM microemulsion
with an overall concentration of MK-2 being 100 mM (∼29 molecules
per RM).
1H–1H 2D NOESY and ROESY NMR Spectroscopic
Studies in AOT/Isooctane w0 12 RM
2DNMR samples were ran using similar conditions used previously[61] using a Varian model MR400 400 MHz magnet at
26 °C. A standardNOESY pulse sequence was used consisting of
256 transients with 16 scans in the f1 direction using a 200 ms mixing
time, 45° pulse angle, and a relaxation delay of 1.5 s. A standard
ROESYAD pulse sequence was used consiting of 256 transients with 16
scans in the f1 direction using a 200 ms mixing time, 45° pulse
angle, and a relaxation delay of 2.0 s. The NMR was locked onto 10%
D2O, and the spectrum was referenced to the isooctane methyl
peak at 0.904 ppm as previously reported.[95] The resulting spectrum was processed using MestReNova NMR software
version 10.0.1. The 3D structure illustration within a RM was drawn
using ChemBioD Ultra 12.0 and ChemBio3D Ultra 12.0 based on spectral
parameters described under results.
Authors: Youngjik Choi; Simon J Attwood; Matthew I Hoopes; Elizabeth Drolle; Mikko Karttunen; Zoya Leonenko Journal: Soft Matter Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 3.679
Authors: Ashutosh Upadhyay; Fabio L Fontes; Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarrero; Michael R McNeil; Debbie C Crans; Mary Jackson; Dean C Crick Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Benjamin J Peters; Cameron Van Cleave; Allison A Haase; John Peter B Hough; Keisha A Giffen-Kent; Gabriel M Cardiff; Audra G Sostarecz; Dean C Crick; Debbie C Crans Journal: Langmuir Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Margaret M Braasch-Turi; Jordan T Koehn; Kateryna Kostenkova; Cameron Van Cleave; Jacob W Ives; Heide A Murakami; Dean C Crick; Debbie C Crans Journal: Front Chem Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 5.221