Literature DB >> 29168575

Cuffed vs. uncuffed tracheal tubes in children: a randomised controlled trial comparing leak, tidal volume and complications.

N A Chambers1,2, A Ramgolam1,3, D Sommerfield1, G Zhang4, T Ledowski5, M Thurm1, M Lethbridge1, M Hegarty1, B S von Ungern-Sternberg1,2.   

Abstract

Cuffed tracheal tubes are increasingly used in paediatric anaesthetic practice. This study compared tidal volume and leakage around cuffed and uncuffed tracheal tubes in children who required standardised mechanical ventilation of their lungs in the operating theatre. Children (0-16 years) undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were randomly assigned to receive either a cuffed or an uncuffed tracheal tube. Assessments were made at five different time-points: during volume-controlled ventilation 6 ml.kg-1 , PEEP 5 cmH2 O and during pressure-controlled ventilation 10 cmH2 O / PEEP 5 cmH2 O. The pressure-controlled ventilation measurement time-points were: just before a standardised recruitment manoeuvre; just after recruitment manoeuvre; 10 min; and 30 min after the recruitment manoeuvre. Problems and complications were recorded. During volume-controlled ventilation, leakage was significantly less with cuffed tracheal tubes than with uncuffed tracheal tubes; in ml.kg-1 , median (IQR [range]) 0.20 (0.13-0.39 [0.04-0.60]) vs. 0.82 (0.58-1.38 [0.24-4.85]), respectively, p < 0.001. With pressure-controlled ventilation, leakage was less with cuffed tracheal tubes and stayed unchanged over a 30-min period, whereas with uncuffed tracheal tubes, leakage was higher and increased further over the 30-min period. Tidal volumes were higher in the cuffed group and increased over time, but in the uncuffed group were lower and decreased over time. Both groups showed an increase in tidal volumes following recruitment manoeuvres. There were more short-term complications with uncuffed tracheal tubes, but no major complications were recorded in either group at long-term follow-up. With standardised ventilator settings, cuffed tracheal tubes produced better ventilation characteristics compared with uncuffed tracheal tubes during general anaesthesia for routine elective surgery.
© 2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cuffed; leakage; lung volume; paediatrics; tracheal tube

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29168575     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for neonates.

Authors:  Vedanta Dariya; Luca Moresco; Matteo Bruschettini; Luc P Brion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  Ventilation Liberation Practices Among 380 International PICUs.

Authors:  Jeremy M Loberger; Caitlin M Campbell; José Colleti; Santiago Borasino; Samer Abu-Sultaneh; Robinder G Khemani
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Incidence of Post-extubation Stridor in Infants With Cuffed vs. Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Katharina Bibl; Lena Pracher; Erik Küng; Michael Wagner; Imme Roesner; Angelika Berger; Michael Hermon; Tobias Werther
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Frequency and characterization of the use of cuffed tracheal tubes in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Brazil.

Authors:  João Paulo Berti Buzzi Rodrigues; Suzi Laine Longo Dos Santos Bacci; Janser Moura Pereira; Cíntia Johnston; Vivian Mara Gonçalves de Oliveira Azevedo
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2020-07-13

5.  The prevalence of difficult airway and its associated factors in pediatric patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia: An observational study.

Authors:  Eleni Amaha; Lydia Haddis; Senait Aweke; Efrem Fenta
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-10-20

6.  Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries.

Authors:  Sema Şanal Baş; Gülay Erdoğan Kayhan; Meryem Onay; Yeliz Kılıç
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.