Literature DB >> 29168242

Compositional differences between Copaxone and Glatopa are reflected in altered immunomodulation ex vivo in a mouse model.

Iris Grossman1, Sarah Kolitz2, Arthur Komlosh1, Benjamin Zeskind2, Vera Weinstein1, Daphna Laifenfeld1, Adrian Gilbert1, Oren Bar-Ilan1, Kevin D Fowler2, Tal Hasson1, Attila Konya3, Kevin Wells-Knecht4, Pippa Loupe5, Sigal Melamed-Gal6, Tatiana Molotsky1, Revital Krispin1, Galia Papir1, Yousif Sahly1, Michael R Hayden1.   

Abstract

Copaxone (glatiramer acetate, GA), a structurally and compositionally complex polypeptide nonbiological drug, is an effective treatment for multiple sclerosis, with a well-established favorable safety profile. The short antigenic polypeptide sequences comprising therapeutically active epitopes in GA cannot be deciphered with state-of-the-art methods; and GA has no measurable pharmacokinetic profile and no validated pharmacodynamic markers. The study reported herein describes the use of orthogonal standard and high-resolution physicochemical and biological tests to characterize GA and a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved generic version of GA, Glatopa (USA-FoGA). While similarities were observed with low-resolution or destructive tests, differences between GA and USA-FoGA were measured with high-resolution methods applied to an intact mixture, including variations in surface charge and a unique, high-molecular-weight, hydrophobic polypeptide population observed only in some USA-FoGA lots. Consistent with published reports that modifications in physicochemical attributes alter immune-related processes, genome-wide expression profiles of ex vivo activated splenocytes from mice immunized with either GA or USA-FoGA showed that 7-11% of modulated genes were differentially expressed and enriched for immune-related pathways. Thus, differences between USA-FoGA and GA may include variations in antigenic epitopes that differentially activate immune responses. We propose that the assays reported herein should be considered during the regulatory assessment process for nonbiological complex drugs such as GA.
© 2017 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Copaxone; GA; Glatopa; USA-FoGA; follow-on glatiramoids; glatiramer acetate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29168242     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  3 in total

1.  Response to the Letter-to-the Editor by Cohen et al. concerning our eNeurologicalSci article, Melamed-Gal, et al. Physicochemical, biological, functional and toxicological characterization of the European follow-on glatiramer acetate product as compared with Copaxone. eNeurologicalSci 2018;12:19-30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensci.2018.05.006.

Authors:  Sigal Melamed-Gal; Pippa Loupe; Bracha Timan; Vera Weinstein; Sarah Kolitz; Jenny Zhang; Jason Funt; Arthur Komlosh; Nurit Ashkenazi; Oren Bar-Ilan; Attila Konya; Olga Beriozkin; Daphna Laifenfeld; Tal Hasson; Benjamin Zeskind; Michael Hayden; Steffen Nock; Iris Grossman
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2018-11-28

2.  Physicochemical, biological, functional and toxicological characterization of the European follow-on glatiramer acetate product as compared with Copaxone.

Authors:  S Melamed-Gal; P Loupe; B Timan; V Weinstein; S Kolitz; J Zhang; J Funt; A Komlosh; N Ashkenazi; O Bar-Ilan; A Konya; O Beriozkin; D Laifenfeld; T Hasson; R Krispin; T Molotsky; G Papir; L Sulimani; B Zeskind; P Liu; S Nock; M R Hayden; A Gilbert; I Grossman
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2018-05-30

3.  Physicochemical and Biological Examination of Two Glatiramer Acetate Products.

Authors:  Arthur Komlosh; Vera Weinstein; Pippa Loupe; Tal Hasson; Bracha Timan; Attila Konya; Jessica Alexander; Sigal Melamed-Gal; Steffen Nock
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2019-07-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.