Literature DB >> 29168224

Dynamics in the global protected-area estate since 2004.

Edward Lewis1, Brian MacSharry1, Diego Juffe-Bignoli1, Nyeema Harris2, Georgina Burrows3, Naomi Kingston1, Neil D Burgess1,4.   

Abstract

Nations of the world have committed to a number of goals and targets to address global environmental challenges. Protected areas have for centuries been a key strategy in conservation and play a major role in addressing current challenges. The most important tool used to track progress on protected-area commitments is the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Periodic assessments of the world's protected-area estate show steady growth over the last 2 decades. However, the current method, which uses the latest version of the WDPA, does not show the true dynamic nature of protected areas over time and does not provide information on sites removed from the WDPA. In reality, this method can only show growth or remain stable. We used GIS tools in an approach to assess protected-area change over time based on 12 temporally distinct versions of the WDPA that quantify area added and removed from the WDPA annually from 2004 to 2016. Both the narrative of continual growth of protected area and the counter-narrative of protected area removal were overly simplistic. The former because growth was almost entirely in the marine realm and the latter because some areas removed were reprotected in later years. On average 2.5 million km2 was added to the WDPA annually and 1.1 million km2 was removed. Reasons for the inclusion and removal of protected areas in the WDPA database were in part due to data-quality issues but also to on-the-ground changes. To meet the 17% protected-area component of Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 by 2020, which stood at 14.7% in 2016, either the rate of protected-area removal must decrease or the rate of protected-area designation and addition to the WDPA must increase.
© 2017 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  Aichi target 11; Base de Datos Mundial de las Áreas Protegidas; World Database on Protected Areas; cobertura; coverage; degradación reducción y pérdida de protección legal de las áreas protegidas; objetico 11 de Aichi; protected area; protected area downgrading downsizing degazettement; área protegida; 保护区, 世界保护区数据库 (World Database on Protected Areas), 覆盖, 保护区降级、缩小、撤除, 爱知目标11

Year:  2018        PMID: 29168224     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  9 in total

Review 1.  Sixty years of tracking conservation progress using the World Database on Protected Areas.

Authors:  Heather C Bingham; Diego Juffe Bignoli; Edward Lewis; Brian MacSharry; Neil D Burgess; Piero Visconti; Marine Deguignet; Murielle Misrachi; Matt Walpole; Jessica L Stewart; Thomas M Brooks; Naomi Kingston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Sean L Maxwell; Victor Cazalis; Nigel Dudley; Michael Hoffmann; Ana S L Rodrigues; Sue Stolton; Piero Visconti; Stephen Woodley; Naomi Kingston; Edward Lewis; Martine Maron; Bernardo B N Strassburg; Amelia Wenger; Harry D Jonas; Oscar Venter; James E M Watson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  How to protect half of Earth to ensure it protects sufficient biodiversity.

Authors:  Stuart L Pimm; Clinton N Jenkins; Binbin V Li
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement as a threat to iconic protected areas.

Authors:  Siyu Qin; Rachel E Golden Kroner; Carly Cook; Anteneh T Tesfaw; Rowan Braybrook; Carlos Manuel Rodriguez; Claire Poelking; Michael B Mascia
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 5.  Perspectives on area-based conservation and its meaning for future biodiversity policy.

Authors:  Nina Bhola; Helen Klimmek; Naomi Kingston; Neil D Burgess; Arnout van Soesbergen; Colleen Corrigan; Jerry Harrison; Marcel T J Kok
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Vulnerabilities of protected lands in the face of climate and human footprint changes.

Authors:  Nawal Shrestha; Xiaoting Xu; Jiahui Meng; Zhiheng Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Large Differences in Livelihood Responses and Outcomes to Increased Conservation Enforcement in a Protected Area.

Authors:  Joel Persson; Scott Ford; Anousith Keophoxay; Ole Mertz; Jonas Østergaard Nielsen; Thoumthone Vongvisouk; Michael Zörner
Journal:  Hum Ecol Interdiscip J       Date:  2021-10-07

8.  Land tenure drives Brazil's deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts.

Authors:  Andrea Pacheco; Carsten Meyer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Global trends in protected area connectivity from 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Santiago Saura; Bastian Bertzky; Lucy Bastin; Luca Battistella; Andrea Mandrici; Grégoire Dubois
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.990

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.