Derek J Erstad1,2,3,4, John Ready5,6,7, John Abraham5,6,7,8, Marco L Ferrone5,6,7, Monica M Bertagnolli9,5,6, Elizabeth H Baldini5,6,10, Chandrajit P Raut9,5,6. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. derstad@partners.org. 2. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. derstad@partners.org. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. derstad@partners.org. 4. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. derstad@partners.org. 5. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 9. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Amputation for localized extremity sarcoma (ES), once the primary therapy, is now rarely performed. We reviewed our experience to determine why patients with sarcoma still undergo immediate or delayed amputation, identify differences based on amputation timing, and evaluate outcomes. METHODS: Records of patients with primary, nonmetastatic ES who underwent amputation at our institution from 2001 to 2011 were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed, and survival outcomes were calculated. RESULTS: We categorized 54 patients into three cohorts: primary amputation (A1, n = 18, 33%), secondary amputation after prior limb-sparing surgery (A2, n = 22, 41%), and hand and foot sarcomas (HF, n = 14, 26%). Median age at amputation was 54 years (range 18-88 years). Common indications for amputation (> 40%) were loss of function, bone involvement, multiple compartment involvement, and large tumor size (A1); proximal location, joint involvement, neurovascular compromise, multiple compartment involvement, multifocal or fungating tumor, loss of function, and large tumor size (A2); and joint involvement and prior unplanned surgery (HF). There was no difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.19) or metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.31) between early (A1) and delayed (A2) amputation. Compared with cohorts A1/A2, HF patients had longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Indications for amputation for extremity sarcoma vary between those who undergo primary amputation, delayed amputation, and amputation for hand or foot sarcoma. Amputations chosen judiciously are associated with excellent disease control and survival. For patients who ultimately need amputation, timing (early vs. delayed) does not affect survival.
INTRODUCTION: Amputation for localized extremity sarcoma (ES), once the primary therapy, is now rarely performed. We reviewed our experience to determine why patients with sarcoma still undergo immediate or delayed amputation, identify differences based on amputation timing, and evaluate outcomes. METHODS: Records of patients with primary, nonmetastatic ES who underwent amputation at our institution from 2001 to 2011 were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed, and survival outcomes were calculated. RESULTS: We categorized 54 patients into three cohorts: primary amputation (A1, n = 18, 33%), secondary amputation after prior limb-sparing surgery (A2, n = 22, 41%), and hand and foot sarcomas (HF, n = 14, 26%). Median age at amputation was 54 years (range 18-88 years). Common indications for amputation (> 40%) were loss of function, bone involvement, multiple compartment involvement, and large tumor size (A1); proximal location, joint involvement, neurovascular compromise, multiple compartment involvement, multifocal or fungating tumor, loss of function, and large tumor size (A2); and joint involvement and prior unplanned surgery (HF). There was no difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.19) or metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.31) between early (A1) and delayed (A2) amputation. Compared with cohorts A1/A2, HF patients had longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Indications for amputation for extremity sarcoma vary between those who undergo primary amputation, delayed amputation, and amputation for hand or foot sarcoma. Amputations chosen judiciously are associated with excellent disease control and survival. For patients who ultimately need amputation, timing (early vs. delayed) does not affect survival.