Literature DB >> 29168040

The utility of home sleep apnea tests in patients with low versus high pre-test probability for moderate to severe OSA.

Cathy A Goldstein1, Hala Karnib2, Katherine Williams3, Zunaira Virk4, Afifa Shamim-Uzzaman4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Home sleep apnea tests (HSATs) are an alternative to attended polysomnograms (PSGs) when the pre-test probability for moderate to severe OSA is high. However, insurers often mandate use anytime OSA is suspected regardless of the pre-test probability. Our objective was to determine the ability of HSATs to rule in OSA when the pre-test probability of an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) in the moderate to severe range is low.
METHODS: Patients who underwent HSATs were characterized as low or high pre-test probability based on the presence of two symptoms of the STOP instrument plus either BMI > 35 or male gender. The odds of HSAT diagnostic for OSA dependent on pre-test probability was calculated. Stepwise selection determined predictors of non-diagnostic HSAT. As PSG is performed after HSATs that do not confirm OSA, false negative results were assessed.
RESULTS: Among 196 individuals, pre-test probability was low in 74 (38%) and high in 122 (62%). A lower percentage of individuals with a low versus high pre-test probability for moderate to severe OSA had HSAT results that confirmed OSA (61 versus 84%, p = 0.0002) resulting in an odds ratio (OR) of 0.29 for confirmatory HSAT in the low pre-test probability group (95% CI [0.146, 0.563]). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that age ≤ 50 (OR 3.10 [1.24-7.73]), female gender (OR 3.58[1.50-8.66]), non-enlarged neck circumference (OR 11.50 [2.50-52.93]), and the absence of loud snoring (OR 3.47 [1.30-9.25]) best predicted non-diagnostic HSAT. OSA was diagnosed by PSG in 54% of individuals with negative HSAT which was similar in both pre-test probability groups.
CONCLUSION: HSATs should be reserved for individuals with high pre-test probability for moderate to severe disease as opposed to any individual with suspected OSA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Home sleep apnea test; Obstructive sleep apnea; Polysomnogram; Pre-test probability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29168040     DOI: 10.1007/s11325-017-1594-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Breath        ISSN: 1520-9512            Impact factor:   2.816


  69 in total

1.  Outcomes of home-based diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Robert P Skomro; John Gjevre; John Reid; Brian McNab; Sunita Ghosh; Maryla Stiles; Ruzica Jokic; Heather Ward; David Cotton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Executive dysfunction in OSA before and after treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle Olaithe; Romola S Bucks
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: a clinical practice guideline from theAmerican College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Paul Dallas; Douglas K Owens; Melissa Starkey; Jon-Erik C Holty; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement: Impact of Mild Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults.

Authors:  Susmita Chowdhuri; Stuart F Quan; Fernanda Almeida; Indu Ayappa; Salma Batool-Anwar; Rohit Budhiraja; Peggy E Cruse; Luciano F Drager; Barbara Griss; Nathaniel Marshall; Sanjay R Patel; Susheel Patil; Shandra L Knight; James A Rowley; Alison Slyman
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Potential Underestimation of Sleep Apnea Severity by At-Home Kits: Rescoring In-Laboratory Polysomnography Without Sleep Staging.

Authors:  Matt T Bianchi; Balaji Goparaju
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Multiple naps and the evaluation of daytime sleepiness in patients with upper airway sleep apnea.

Authors:  T Roth; K M Hartse; F Zorick; W Conway
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Vishesh K Kapur; Dennis H Auckley; Susmita Chowdhuri; David C Kuhlmann; Reena Mehra; Kannan Ramar; Christopher G Harrod
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Who is getting tested for obstructive sleep apnea using a portable recording system? Test results from 193,221 patients.

Authors:  Alyssa Cairns; Greg Poulos; Richard Bogan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Management of sleep apnea without high pretest probability or with comorbidities by three nights of portable sleep monitoring.

Authors:  Arnoldo Guerrero; Cristina Embid; Valentina Isetta; Ramón Farre; Joaquin Duran-Cantolla; Olga Parra; Ferran Barbé; Josep M Montserrat; Juan F Masa
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Authors:  Nancy A Collop; W McDowell Anderson; Brian Boehlecke; David Claman; Rochelle Goldberg; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Hudgel; Michael Sateia; Richard Schwab
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more
  3 in total

1.  Utility of home sleep apnea testing devices in patients with cardiac conditions-critical manual interpretation of the raw data is important.

Authors:  Mukesh Kapoor
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Predictors of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea: identification of sex differences.

Authors:  Damien E Earl; Sushil S Lakhani; Daniel B Loriaux; Andrew R Spector
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  An effective model for screening moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire.

Authors:  Yuyu Wang; Juanjuan Zou; Huajun Xu; Cuiping Jiang; Hongliang Yi; Jian Guan; Shankai Yin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.005

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.