Literature DB >> 29168039

Sequential Detection of Compromised Items Using Response Times in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Edison M Choe1, Jinming Zhang2, Hua-Hua Chang2.   

Abstract

Item compromise persists in undermining the integrity of testing, even secure administrations of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) with sophisticated item exposure controls. In ongoing efforts to tackle this perennial security issue in CAT, a couple of recent studies investigated sequential procedures for detecting compromised items, in which a significant increase in the proportion of correct responses for each item in the pool is monitored in real time using moving averages. In addition to actual responses, response times are valuable information with tremendous potential to reveal items that may have been leaked. Specifically, examinees that have preknowledge of an item would likely respond more quickly to it than those who do not. Therefore, the current study proposes several augmented methods for the detection of compromised items, all involving simultaneous monitoring of changes in both the proportion correct and average response time for every item using various moving average strategies. Simulation results with an operational item pool indicate that, compared to the analysis of responses alone, utilizing response times can afford marked improvements in detection power with fewer false positives.

Keywords:  change-point detection; computerized adaptive testing; repeated significance tests; response time; sequential analysis; test security

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29168039     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-017-9596-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  5 in total

1.  Detecting Outliers in Factor Analysis Using the Forward Search Algorithm.

Authors:  Dimitris Mavridis; Irini Moustaki
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.

Authors:  Nicole K Öztürk; George Karabatsos
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-11-28

3.  Comparing the Performance of Eight Item Preknowledge Detection Statistics.

Authors:  Dmitry I Belov
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 4.  Psychometrics behind Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Bayesian Checks on Cheating on Tests.

Authors:  Wim J van der Linden; Charles Lewis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.500

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Hybrid Threshold-Based Sequential Procedures for Detecting Compromised Items in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Licensure Exam.

Authors:  Chansoon Lee; Hong Qian
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.088

2.  Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.

Authors:  Justin L Kern; Edison Choe
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-10

3.  Upon Repeated Reflection: Consequences of Frequent Exposure to the Cognitive Reflection Test for Mechanical Turk Participants.

Authors:  Jan K Woike
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.