Literature DB >> 29167886

Payment Reform to Enhance Collaboration of Primary Care and Cardiology: A Review.

Steven A Farmer1,2, Paul N Casale3,4, Linda D Gillam3,5, John S Rumsfeld3, Shari Erickson6, Neil M Kirschner6, Kevin de Regnier7, Bruce R Williams7, R Shawn Martin8, Mark B McClellan2.   

Abstract

Importance: The US health care system faces an unsustainable trajectory of high costs and inconsistent outcomes. The fee-for-service payment model has contributed to inefficiency, and new payment methods are a promising approach to improving value. Health reforms are needed to increase patient access, reduce costs, and improve health care quality, and the landmark Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act presents a roadmap for reform. The product of a collaboration between primary care and cardiology clinicians, this review describes a conceptual approach to delivery and payment reforms that aim to better support primary care-cardiology comanagement of chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Observations: Few existing alternative payment models specifically address long-term management of CVD. Primary care medical homes and accountable care organizations come closest, but both emphasize primary care, and cardiologists have often not been well engaged. A collaborative care framework should articulate distinct roles and responsibilities for primary care and cardiology in CVD comanagement. Finally, a series of payment models aim to better support clinicians in providing accountable, seamless, and patient-centered cardiac care. Conclusions & Relevance: Clinical leadership is essential during this time of change in the health care system. Patients often struggle to navigate a fragmented and expensive system, whereas clinicians often practice with incomplete information about tests, treatments, and recommendations by their colleagues. The payment models described in this review offer an opportunity to create more satisfying approaches to patient care while improving value. These models have potential to support more effective coordination and to facilitate broader health care system transformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29167886     DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  4 in total

1.  Inconsistent Reporting of Potential Conflicts of Interest Disclosure.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Leading Innovative Practice: Leadership Attributes in LEAP Practices.

Authors:  Benjamin F Crabtree; Jenna Howard; William L Miller; DeANN Cromp; Clarissa Hsu; Katie Coleman; Brian Austin; Margaret Flinter; Leah Tuzzio; Edward H Wagner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Facilitators and barriers to post-discharge pain assessment and triage: a qualitative study of nurses' and patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Jinying Chen; Jessica G Wijesundara; Angela Patterson; Sarah L Cutrona; Sandra Aiello; David D McManus; M Diane McKee; Bo Wang; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.908

4.  Defining Pooled' Place-Based' Budgets for Health and Social Care: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Davide Tebaldi; Jonathan Stokes
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.913

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.