Literature DB >> 29167877

Utility of Imaging-Based Biomarkers for Glutamate-Targeted Drug Development in Psychotic Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Daniel C Javitt1,2, Cameron S Carter3, John H Krystal4, Joshua T Kantrowitz1,2, Ragy R Girgis1, Lawrence S Kegeles1, John D Ragland3, Richard J Maddock3, Tyler A Lesh3, Costin Tanase3, Philip R Corlett4, Douglas L Rothman4, Graeme Mason4, Maolin Qiu4, James Robinson2, William Z Potter5, Marlene Carlson1, Melanie M Wall1,5, Tse-Hwei Choo1, Jack Grinband1, Jeffrey A Lieberman1.   

Abstract

Importance: Despite strong theoretical rationale and preclinical evidence, several glutamate-targeted treatments for schizophrenia have failed in recent pivotal trials, prompting questions as to target validity, compound inadequacy, or lack of target engagement. A key limitation for glutamate-based treatment development is the lack of functional target-engagement biomarkers for translation between preclinical and early-stage clinical studies. We evaluated the utility of 3 potential biomarkers-ketamine-evoked changes in the functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen level-dependent response (pharmacoBOLD), glutamate proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS), and task-based fMRI-for detecting ketamine-related alterations in brain glutamate. Objective: To identify measures with sufficient effect size and cross-site reliability to serve as glutamatergic target engagement biomarkers within early-phase clinical studies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at an academic research institution between May 2014 and October 2015 as part of the National Institute of Mental Health-funded Fast-Fail Trial for Psychotic Spectrum Disorders project. All raters were blinded to study group. Healthy volunteers aged 18 to 55 years of either sex and free of significant medical or psychiatric history were recruited from 3 sites. Data were analyzed between November 2015 and December 2016. Interventions: Volunteers received either sequential ketamine (0.23 mg/kg infusion over 1 minute followed by 0.58 mg/kg/h infusion over 30 minutes and then 0.29 mg/kg/h infusion over 29 minutes) or placebo infusions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ketamine-induced changes in pharmacoBOLD, 1H MRS, and task-based fMRI measures, along with symptom ratings. Measures were prespecified prior to data collection.
Results: Of the 65 volunteers, 41 (63%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 31.1 (9.6) years; 59 (91%) had at least 1 valid scan. A total of 53 volunteers (82%) completed both ketamine infusions. In pharmacoBOLD, a highly robust increase (Cohen d = 5.4; P < .001) in fMRI response was observed, with a consistent response across sites. A smaller but significant signal (Cohen d = 0.64; P = .04) was also observed in 1H MRS-determined levels of glutamate+glutamine immediately following ketamine infusion. By contrast, no significant differences in task-activated fMRI responses were found between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings demonstrate robust effects of ketamine on pharmacoBOLD across sites, supporting its utility for definitive assessment of functional target engagement. Other measures, while sensitive to ketamine effects, were not sufficiently robust for use as cross-site target engagement measures. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02134951.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29167877      PMCID: PMC5833531          DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry        ISSN: 2168-622X            Impact factor:   21.596


  46 in total

Review 1.  Translating glutamate: from pathophysiology to treatment.

Authors:  Daniel C Javitt; Darryle Schoepp; Peter W Kalivas; Nora D Volkow; Carlos Zarate; Kalpana Merchant; Mark F Bear; Daniel Umbricht; Mihaly Hajos; William Z Potter; Chi-Ming Lee
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Reversal of phencyclidine effects by a group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist in rats.

Authors:  B Moghaddam; B W Adams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  NMDA receptor and schizophrenia: a brief history.

Authors:  Joseph T Coyle
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Age-Dependent Effects of Methylphenidate on the Human Dopaminergic System in Young vs Adult Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anouk Schrantee; Hyke G H Tamminga; Cheima Bouziane; Marco A Bottelier; Esther E Bron; Henk-Jan M M Mutsaerts; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Inge R Groote; Serge A R B Rombouts; Ramon J L Lindauer; Stefan Klein; Wiro J Niessen; Brent C Opmeer; Frits Boer; Paul J Lucassen; Susan L Andersen; Hilde M Geurts; Liesbeth Reneman
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 5.  Dopamine D(2) receptors and their role in atypical antipsychotic action: still necessary and may even be sufficient.

Authors:  S Kapur; G Remington
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Neural correlates of relational and item-specific encoding during working and long-term memory in schizophrenia.

Authors:  John D Ragland; Robert S Blumenfeld; Ian S Ramsay; Andrew Yonelinas; Jong Yoon; Marjorie Solomon; Cameron S Carter; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Activation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by ketamine: a novel step in the pathway from NMDA receptor blockade to dopaminergic and cognitive disruptions associated with the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  B Moghaddam; B Adams; A Verma; D Daly
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effects of ketamine on brain function during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  M Steffens; B Becker; C Neumann; A M Kasparbauer; I Meyhöfer; B Weber; M A Mehta; R Hurlemann; U Ettinger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Quantifying the attenuation of the ketamine pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging response in humans: a validation using antipsychotic and glutamatergic agents.

Authors:  O M Doyle; S De Simoni; A J Schwarz; C Brittain; O G O'Daly; S C R Williams; M A Mehta
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Test-retest reliability of the BOLD pharmacological MRI response to ketamine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S De Simoni; A J Schwarz; O G O'Daly; A F Marquand; C Brittain; C Gonzales; S Stephenson; S C R Williams; M A Mehta
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  31 in total

1.  Group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist prodrugs LY2979165 and LY2140023 attenuate the functional imaging response to ketamine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Mitul A Mehta; Anne Schmechtig; Vasileia Kotoula; Juliet McColm; Kimberley Jackson; Claire Brittain; Sitra Tauscher-Wisniewski; Bruce J Kinon; Paul D Morrison; Thomas Pollak; Timothy Mant; Steven C R Williams; Adam J Schwarz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Pharmacological Optimization for Successful Traumatic Brain Injury Drug Development.

Authors:  Samuel M Poloyac; Richard J Bertz; Lee A McDermott; Punit Marathe
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  The neurobiology of depression, ketamine and rapid-acting antidepressants: Is it glutamate inhibition or activation?

Authors:  Chadi G Abdallah; Gerard Sanacora; Ronald S Duman; John H Krystal
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  The effects of ketamine on prefrontal glutamate neurotransmission in healthy and depressed subjects.

Authors:  Chadi G Abdallah; Henk M De Feyter; Lynnette A Averill; Lihong Jiang; Christopher L Averill; Golam M I Chowdhury; Prerana Purohit; Robin A de Graaf; Irina Esterlis; Christoph Juchem; Brian P Pittman; John H Krystal; Douglas L Rothman; Gerard Sanacora; Graeme F Mason
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Ketamine induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow, interregional connectivity patterns, and glutamate metabolism.

Authors:  James Edward Bryant; Michael Frölich; Steve Tran; Meredith Amanda Reid; Adrienne Carol Lahti; Nina Vanessa Kraguljac
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Dopamine and glutamate in schizophrenia: biology, symptoms and treatment.

Authors:  Robert A McCutcheon; John H Krystal; Oliver D Howes
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.548

7.  The M1/M4 preferring muscarinic agonist xanomeline modulates functional connectivity and NMDAR antagonist-induced changes in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Caterina Montani; Carola Canella; Adam J Schwarz; Jennifer Li; Gary Gilmour; Alberto Galbusera; Keith Wafford; Daniel Gutierrez-Barragan; Andrew McCarthy; David Shaw; Karen Knitowski; David McKinzie; Alessandro Gozzi; Christian Felder
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 8.  Glutamate and GABA Homeostasis and Neurometabolism in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Ajay Sarawagi; Narayan Datt Soni; Anant Bahadur Patel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  A robust and reproducible connectome fingerprint of ketamine is highly associated with the connectomic signature of antidepressants.

Authors:  Chadi G Abdallah; Kyung-Heup Ahn; Lynnette A Averill; Samaneh Nemati; Christopher L Averill; Samar Fouda; Mohini Ranganathan; Peter T Morgan; Deepak C D'Souza; Daniel H Mathalon; John H Krystal; Naomi R Driesen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Glutamate connectivity associations converge upon the salience network in schizophrenia and healthy controls.

Authors:  Robert A McCutcheon; Toby Pillinger; Maria Rogdaki; Juan Bustillo; Oliver D Howes
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.