| Literature DB >> 29167658 |
Viviana Versace1,2, Stefania Campostrini1,2, Frediano Tezzon3, Sara Martignago1,2, Markus Kofler4, Leopold Saltuari1,2,4, Luca Sebastianelli1,2, Raffaele Nardone3,5.
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy with acute onset and rapid clinical worsening; early diagnosis and immunomodulating therapy can ameliorate the course of disease. During the first days, however, nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are not always conclusive. Here, we describe a 73-year-old man presenting with progressive muscular weakness of the lower limbs, ascending to the upper limbs, accompanied by distal sensory disturbances. Neuroimaging of brain and spine and NCSs were unremarkable; cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed no albuminocytologic dissociation. Based on typical clinical features, and on positivity for serum GD1b-IgM antibodies, GBS with proximal conduction failure at multiple radicular levels was postulated, and a standard regime of intravenous immunoglobulin was administered. Four weeks later, the patient presented with flaccid tetraparesis, areflexia, and reduction of position sense, tingling paresthesias, and initial respiratory distress. Repeat NCS still revealed almost normal findings, except for the disappearance of right ulnar nerve F-waves. A few days thereafter, the patient developed severe respiratory insufficiency requiring mechanical ventilation for 2 weeks. On day 50, NCS revealed for the first time markedly reduced compound muscle action potentials and sensory nerve action potentials in all tested nerves, without signs of demyelination; needle electromyography documented widespread denervation. The diagnosis of acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy was made. After 3 months of intensive rehabilitation, the patient regained the ability to walk with little assistance and was discharged home. In conclusion, normal NCS findings up to several weeks do not exclude the diagnosis of GBS. Very proximal axonal conduction failure with late distal axonal degeneration should be taken into consideration, and electrodiagnostic follow-up examinations, even employing unusual techniques, are recommended over several weeks after disease onset.Entities:
Keywords: Guillain–Barré syndrome; acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy; anti-ganglioside antibodies; axonal conduction failure; nodo-paranodopathy
Year: 2017 PMID: 29167658 PMCID: PMC5682302 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1First nerve conduction study (NCS) performed according to standard techniques on day 2 after admission. Right (A) and left (C) tibial motor NCS from abductor hallucis muscle following stimulation at medial ankle (upper trace) and popliteal fossa (lower trace), and corresponding right (B) and left (D) F-waves. Right peroneal motor NCS (E) from extensor digitorum brevis muscle following stimulation anterior to ankle (upper trace), below fibular head (middle trace), above fibular head (lower trace). Antidromic sensory NCS from left sural nerve (F) with recording from posterior ankle following stimulation at posterior-lateral calf, and from left radial nerve (G) with recording from snuffbox following stimulation over distal-mid radius. Right (H) and left (J) ulnar motor NCS from abductor digiti minimi muscle following stimulation at wrist (upper trace), below elbow (middle trace), above elbow (upper trace), and corresponding right (I) and left (K) F-waves. Right and left median and left peroneal nerves are not shown as their NCSs were also unremarkable. Note that motor and sensory responses of all testes nerves have normal latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity; tibial and ulnar nerve F-waves are normal bilaterally for latency, amplitude, configuration, and persistence; some A-waves are present bilaterally in the tibial nerve F-wave study.
Figure 2Second nerve conduction study according to standard techniques performed on day 25 after admission. No F-waves are recorded by supramaximal stimulation of right ulnar nerve at wrist; M waves are within normal range.
Figure 3Third nerve conduction study performed according to standard techniques on day 50 after admission. Same nerves, stimulation, and recording conditions as in Figures 1A–K (A–K). Note marked amplitude reduction without temporal dispersion of both compound muscle action potentials and sensory nerve action potentials in all tested nerves with almost normal conduction velocities. Tibial nerve F-waves remain present and normal bilaterally, with some A-waves still present. Right ulnar nerve F-waves are now absent, with some A-waves present; left ulnar F-waves show reduced amplitude.