Literature DB >> 29166928

Effects of long-term weekly iron and folic acid supplementation on lower genital tract infection - a double blind, randomised controlled trial in Burkina Faso.

Loretta Brabin1,2, Stephen A Roberts3, Sabine Gies4,5, Andrew Nelson6, Salou Diallo7, Christopher J Stewart8, Adama Kazienga7, Julia Birtles9, Sayouba Ouedraogo7, Yves Claeys10, Halidou Tinto11,12, Umberto d'Alessandro7, E Brian Faragher13, Bernard Brabin14,15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Provision of routine iron supplements to prevent anaemia could increase the risk for lower genital tract infections as virulence of some pathogens depends on iron availability. This trial in Burkina Faso assessed whether weekly periconceptional iron supplementation increased the risk of lower genital tract infection in young non-pregnant and pregnant women.
METHODS: Genital tract infections were assessed within a double blind, controlled, non-inferiority trial of malaria risk among nulliparous women, randomised to receive either iron and folic acid or folic acid alone, weekly, under direct observation for 18 months. Women conceiving during this period entered the pregnancy cohort. End assessment (FIN) for women remaining non-pregnant was at 18 months. For the pregnancy cohort, end assessment was at the first scheduled antenatal visit (ANC1). Infection markers included Nugent scores for abnormal flora and bacterial vaginosis (BV), T. vaginalis PCR, vaginal microbiota, reported signs and symptoms, and antibiotic and anti-fungal prescriptions. Iron biomarkers were assessed at baseline, FIN and ANC1. Analysis compared outcomes by intention to treat and in iron replete/deficient categories.
RESULTS: A total of 1954 women (mean 16.8 years) were followed and 478 (24.5%) became pregnant. Median supplement adherence was 79% (IQR 59-90%). Baseline BV prevalence was 12.3%. At FIN and ANC1 prevalence was 12.8% and 7.0%, respectively (P < 0.011). T. vaginalis prevalence was 4.9% at FIN and 12.9% at ANC1 (P < 0.001). BV and T. vaginalis prevalence and microbiota profiles did not differ at trial end-points. Iron-supplemented non-pregnant women received more antibiotic treatments for non-genital infections (P = 0.014; mainly gastrointestinal infections (P = 0.005), anti-fungal treatments for genital infections (P = 0.014) and analgesics (P = 0.008). Weekly iron did not significantly reduce iron deficiency prevalence. At baseline, iron-deficient women were more likely to have normal vaginal flora (P = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Periconceptional weekly iron supplementation of young women did not increase the risk of lower genital tract infections but did increase general morbidity in the non-pregnant cohort. Unabsorbed gut iron due to malaria could induce enteric infections, accounting for the increased administration of antibiotics and antifungals in the iron-supplemented arm. This finding reinforces concerns about routine iron supplementation in highly malarious areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number NCT01210040 . Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov on 27 September 2010.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Antibiotics; Burkina Faso; Iron; Lower genital tract infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29166928      PMCID: PMC5700548          DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0967-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med        ISSN: 1741-7015            Impact factor:   8.775


Background

Most genital tract commensals and pathogens require iron for growth and adhesion, including Gardnerella vaginalis [1], Trichomonas vaginalis [2] and Candida albicans [3]. In contrast, most Lactobacillus species, which maintain a healthy vaginal ecosystem, do not require an iron substrate [4]. There have been no previous randomised trials assessing whether vaginal infections are influenced by host iron status. Local iron is available from secreted lactoferrin [5], transudated ferritin and transferrin [6, 7], and menstrual haem iron. Host iron status could affect growth and adhesion of bacterial vaginosis (BV) [8], which is associated with a massive overgrowth of vaginal organisms. Dysbiosis enhances human immunodeficiency viral infectivity [9] and increases by two-fold the risk of preterm birth and perinatal death [10]. Higher concentrations of transferrin in cervico-vaginal fluid were correlated with preterm birth risk in a previous study, suggesting that iron availability must be considered [11]. In areas where anaemia is common, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends routine iron supplementation [12]. It is currently unknown whether this affects bacterial profiles in the reproductive tract, especially in already iron replete women. In routine programmes, these women receive additional supplements despite there being good evidence that elevated iron stores predispose to systemic infection and inflammation [13]. However, data are absent regarding non-malarial infection risk following iron supplementation during pregnancy [14], or following intermittent supplementation in menstruating women [15]. In the context of a double blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial to assess safety of periconceptional iron supplementation in relation to malaria among young women in Burkina Faso [16], we assessed whether weekly iron supplementation, or baseline host iron status, affected markers of genital infection. The trial design provided two cohorts, namely a large nulliparous cohort who remained non-pregnant and received up to 18 months supplementation, and a primigravid cohort who conceived during the trial.

Methods

The trial protocol and amendments were approved by ethical review boards and regulatory authorities at each collaborating centre. This sub-study was conducted within a randomised trial of the safety of weekly iron and folic acid supplementation in young women exposed to malaria. The primary specified outcome was BV prevalence, whereas the secondary outcomes were non-BV Nugent scores, vaginal discharge and pH > 4.5. Finally, exploratory outcomes were microbiota and drug prescriptions (antibiotics, antifungals, analgesics). Additional data on the main trial and other details relevant to this paper are provided in Additional files 1, 2, 3 and 4.

General procedures

Between April 2011 and January 2014 a randomised, double blind, controlled trial was conducted in rural Burkina Faso in the Nanoro Health and Demographic Surveillance System area [17], situated 85 km from Ouagadougou (Additional file 1). Two previous surveys in Burkina Faso indicated a BV prevalence of approximately 6–8% [18, 19]. HIV prevalence is low and reported as 1.2% among women aged 15–49 years and 0.76% among pregnant women [20]. Women were recruited from 30 villages and individual and guardian written consents were obtained. Healthy nulliparous, non-pregnant women aged 15–24 years received either weekly ferrous gluconate and folic acid (intervention), or folic acid alone (control) as a directly observed therapy. Participation continued for 18 months for women who did not conceive or, if they became pregnant, they entered the pregnant cohort. Weekly supplementation continued until a scheduled first antenatal visit (ANC1), which was the trial primary end-point.

Non-pregnant cohort

At enrolment demographic data and medical/obstetric histories were recorded and women were clinically examined. Height (nearest mm), weight (nearest 100 g), and mid-upper arm circumference (mm; MUAC) were measured in duplicate. A venous blood sample (5 mL) was collected for later iron biomarker assessments. Two self-taken swabs were requested for a BV slide and pH measurement. Samples were not collected during menses. Women symptomatic for T. vaginalis and BV were treated with single dose metronidazole (2 g orally), and those symptomatic for C. albicans with miconazole (200 mg intravaginally, daily for 3 days). All participants received a single dose of albendazole (400 mg) and praziquantel (1500–2400 mg according to height). Participants were individually randomised to receive either a capsule containing ferrous gluconate (60 mg) and folic acid (2.8 mg), or an identical capsule containing folic acid alone (2.8 mg), as then recommended by WHO [15]. This regimen was directly observed at weekly visits and continued for up to 18 months, when an end assessment (FIN) was completed and repeat vaginal swabs for BV and vaginal pH were requested. At FIN, duplicate swabs were additionally requested for preparation of vaginal fluid eluates for microbiota and T. vaginalis PCR assays. Swabs were kept cool until returned to the laboratory within 2–4 hours. A venous blood sample (5 mL) was obtained for iron biomarkers and malaria microscopy. Women were monitored for pregnancy at weekly visits and symptoms of illness were recorded by a field worker. Symptomatic participants were directed to attend a health centre for free medical treatment for participant care, as this was required for a safety trial. Health centre staff recorded all visits, and a medically qualified researcher collated information on symptoms, clinical diagnoses and treatments. Pregnant women were instructed to attend Nanoro hospital for ANC1.

Pregnant cohort

At ANC1 (primary endpoint), scheduled at 13–16 weeks’ gestation, a venous blood sample (5 mL) was obtained for iron biomarkers and malaria microscopy, and self-taken vaginal swabs requested as for the non-pregnant cohort. An ultrasound examination was completed to date gestational age. Symptomatic women were treated for BV and T. vaginalis with metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, for C. albicans with intravaginal miconazole 200 mg daily for 3 days, and for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis with ceftriaxone 250 mg intramuscularly once and amoxycillin 500 mg orally thrice daily for 7 days for suspected cervical infection. Women were encouraged to deliver at their closest health centre. The study provided free obstetric care.

Laboratory procedures

Bacterial vaginosis

BV slides were fixed, Gram stained, air dried and forwarded to the Microbiology Laboratories, Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Trust, UK, for Nugent scoring [21]. Approximately 10% of slides, plus indeterminate slides, were read in duplicate. Nugent scores of 7–10 indicated BV, 4–6 intermediate, and 0–3 normal flora. Gram stains were available for 80.5% of women at enrolment, 76.5% at FIN, and 94.6% at ANC1, with no differences between trial arms.

Vaginal eluates

Each tube containing a swab for vaginal eluate was processed on laboratory arrival when 5 mL of PBS was added to the tube and shaken at high speed (5 minutes), before pipetting and freezing (–20 °C). Vaginal eluates were air freighted on dry ice to the University of Northumbria, UK.

Malaria microscopy

Blood films were stained with Giemsa and read independently by two qualified microscopists and, in the case of discordant results, by a third reader.

Iron status

At the Nanoro Research Laboratories, ferritin, indicative of iron stores, and serum transferrin receptor (sTfR), indicative of functional iron deficit, were measured in duplicate by ELISA (Spectro Ferritin S-22 and TFC 94 Transferrin Receptor, RAMCO Laboratories Inc., Texas) and C-reactive protein (CRP) by ELISA (EU59131, IBL International, GMBH, Hamburg). Definitions of iron deficiency were (1) adjusted ferritin (adjFE) allowing for inflammation, ferritin < 15 μg/L if CRP < 10 μg/mL, or ferritin < 70 μg/L if CRP ≥ 10 μg/mL; or (2) a ratio of sTfR μg/mL to log10 ferritin > 5.6, [22], which assesses both stored and functional iron and is possibly less affected by inflammation.

Microbiota/T. vaginalis qPCR

DNA was extracted from vaginal eluates using the PowerLyzer Power Soil kit (MoBio, SD, USA) with the following modifications. A 250-μL aliquot of vaginal eluate was combined with 500 μL of bead solution added to the bead tube and processed following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA extraction negative controls were processed for each kit and sequenced alongside test samples. Bacterial profiling of the variable region 4 (V4) of the 16S rRNA gene was performed by NU-OMICS (Northumbria University) based on the Schloss wet-lab MiSeq procedure [23], and T. vaginalis by qPCR [24] (Additional file 2).

Statistical analysis

The sample size was determined from formal power calculations for the malaria trial endpoints [25]. Analyses excluded women who remained non-menarcheal throughout the trial and any who became menarcheal within 6 months of FIN when menses may have been irregular. The primary analyses were comparisons of BV (Nugent > 6) risk at ANC1 and at FIN (menarcheal) by arm on an intention to treat basis using a binomial model with a log link, and baseline infection and use of antibiotics in the 3 months prior to assessment as covariates. Other infection markers were analysed similarly. Nugent scoring gave a 3-level classification and each level was compared to the remaining levels. Intention to treat analyses of iron deficiency used a similar approach with no covariates. Associations between baseline infections and dichotomised iron deficiency markers were similarly analysed, but with no covariate for antibiotic use, as free study prescriptions had not commenced. The analysis adjusted for MUAC, a surrogate for nutritional status. Associations between baseline infection indicators and continuous biomarkers followed similar binomial models, with log-transformed values scaled by their standard deviations to give comparable risk ratios across markers. The P values for multiple markers were adjusted for multiple testing using the false discovery rate method [26]. Receipt of antibiotics, antifungals and analgesics was classified by clinical indication. Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence ratios and to test for differences between arms, using number of visits between enrolment and assessment as an exposure time offset. Incidence rates are presented per 50 visits as this approximated the mean number of visits prior to follow-up assessment. For separate indications, P values were adjusted using the false discovery rate approach. The statistical methods for analysis and visualisation of microbiota communities are described in Additional file 2. Multinomial regression models were used to identify if Community State Type (CST) was associated with trial arm, pregnancy, iron deficiency or infection markers.

Results

Participants

A total of 1959 nulliparous women were randomised and 1954 were included in the intention to treat dataset (Fig. 1). During follow-up, 478 (24.5%) women became pregnant, with 1476 remaining non-pregnant; 315 (65.9%) were assessed at ANC1, with two-thirds of these visits occurring at < 20 weeks’ gestation. Among the non-pregnant cohort, defined as menarcheal and followed up to 18 months, 877 (56.6%) women completed an end assessment survey (FIN). Women lost to follow-up differed in some baseline characteristics (Additional file 3: Table S1). Table 1 shows baseline participant characteristics, categorised by subsequent status in constituting the pregnant or non-pregnant cohorts. Trial arms were well balanced. In the intention to treat analysis, the median (interquartile range) number of directly observed treatments as a percentage of the number of weeks in the study was 79% (58–90%, n = 1954), with no difference by trial arm. For the total sample, adolescents (<20 years) comprised 93%. BV prevalence was 12.3%, with 8.9% having intermediate flora. BV correlated with MUAC (RR per cm 1.23; 95% CI 1.08–1.41, P = 0.003) and BMI (RR per kg/m2 1.23; 95% CI 1.08–1.40, P = 0.002), but not with age (P = 0.82). Prevalence of vaginal discharge was 1.6%. Vaginal pH ≥ 4.5 was recorded in 50.6%, with no difference between arms.
Fig. 1

Participant flow chart

Table 1

Baseline characteristics by trial arm of participants who subsequently became pregnant or remained non-pregnant during follow-up

VariablePregnant cohortNon-pregnant cohort
Na IronControlNa IronControl
N = 258N = 220N = 766N = 783
Sociodemographic
Age, years, mean (SD)47817.1 (1.7)17.1 (1.7)154916.7 (1.7)16.7 (1.8)
 Ethnic group, n (%)
  Mossi478250 (96.9)214 (97.3)1548730 (95.3)757 (96.8)
  Other4788 (3.1)6 (2.7)154836 (4.7)25 (3.2)
 Marital status
  Married47822 (8.5)15 (6.8)154417 (2.2)18 (2.3)
  Never married478236 (91.5)204 (92.7)1544748 (97.8)760 (97.6)
  Previously married4780 (0)1 (0.5)15440 (0)1 (0.1)
 Occupation,b n (%)
  Student47860 (23.3)51 (23.2)1549255 (33.3)274 (35.0)
  Trading47810 (3.9)10 (4.5)154924 (3.1)21 (2.7)
  Domestic labour478154 (59.7)120 (54.5)1549401 (52.3)407 (52.0)
  Farming478130 (50.4)101 (45.9)1549269 (35.1)290 (37.0)
  Other4783 (1.2)3 (1.4)15493 (0.4)2 (0.3)
 Education, n (%)
  No schooling477176 (68.5)142 (64.5)1544447 (58.6)450 (57.6)
  Primary47854 (20.9)38 (17.3)1549168 (21.9)169 (21.6)
  Lower secondary47724 (9.3)38 (17.3)1544144 (18.9)153 (19.6)
  Higher secondary4773 (1.2)2 (0.9)15444 (0.5)9 (1.2)
 Literate, n (%)47368 (26.7)62 (28.4)1530278 (36.8)297 (38.4)
Reproductive history and infections, n (%)
 Menarcheal478241 (93.4)203 (92.3)1549639 (83.4)645 (82.4)
 Menarche age, mean (SD)44314.9 (1.0)14.8 (1.1)127915 (1.0)15.1 (1.1)
 Ever had sex47898 (38)82 (37.3)1548159 (20.8)164 (21.0)
 Uses contraception47854 (20.9)51 (23.2)1549106 (13.8)86 (11.0)
 Uses condoms47853 (20.5)50 (22.7)1549103 (13.4)81 (10.3)
 Nugent 7–1039133 (15.7)23 (12.7)124780 (13.0)68 (10.8)
 Nugent 4–639117 (8.1)11 (6.1)124749 (8.0)66 (10.5)
 Nugent 0–3391160 (76.2)147 (81.2)1247487 (79.1)497 (78.8)
 Vaginal discharge4783 (1.2)4 (1.8)154913 (1.7)12 (1.5)
 Vaginal pH ≥ 4.5394119 (55.9)84 (46.4)1280317 (50.3)328 (50.5)
Nutrition and iron biomarkers, n (%)
 Drinks alcohol476140 (54.5)119 (54.3)1549372 (48.6)380 (48.5)
 BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)47820.2 (1.8)20.3 (2.1)154919.7 (2.2)19.6 (2.2)
 MUAC, cm, mean (SD)47824.1 (1.8)24.3 (2.2)154923.6 (2.1)23.6 (2.2)
 Iron deficient (adjFE)46725 (10.0)26 (12.0)152884 (11.1)100 (13.0)
 Iron deficient (ratio sTfR/log ferritin)47052 (20.6)55 (25.3)1524162 (21.4)168 (21.9)
Adherence to treatment
 DOT,c mean (SD)47870.3 (27.0)71.4 (26.0)154970.0 (27.8)70.8 (26.3)

aTotal responders

bMore than one response allowed

cNumber of directly observed treatments as a percentage of the number of weeks from enrolment to assessment

adjFE adjusted ferritin, BMI body mass index, DOT directly observed treatment, MUAC mid-upper arm circumference, SD standard deviation, sTfR serum transferrin receptor

Participant flow chart Baseline characteristics by trial arm of participants who subsequently became pregnant or remained non-pregnant during follow-up aTotal responders bMore than one response allowed cNumber of directly observed treatments as a percentage of the number of weeks from enrolment to assessment adjFE adjusted ferritin, BMI body mass index, DOT directly observed treatment, MUAC mid-upper arm circumference, SD standard deviation, sTfR serum transferrin receptor

Infections and iron status at baseline assessment

Baseline prevalence of iron deficiency was lower using the single iron biomarker adjFE than when using the combined marker sTfR/log ferritin, but with either marker, it did not differ by trial arm (Table 1). Prevalence of iron deficiency remained very similar by trial arm using varying CRP cut-offs (5–25 μg/mL) (Additional file 4b). Iron replete participants at baseline were less likely to have normal vaginal flora (Nugent score 0–3) (adjFE: P = 0.036; sTfR/log ferritin ratio: P = 0.255). Vaginal discharge was reported by only a few women but was less prevalent with iron repletion (adjFE: P = 0.03; sTfR/log ferritin ratio: P = 0.06) (Table 2). A sensitivity analysis using alternative lower ferritin thresholds of < 15 μg/L and CRP < 10 μg/mL, or < 30 μg/L and CRP ≥ 10 μg/mL, for iron depletion adjusting for inflammation was explored to assess whether a lower ferritin cut-off significantly altered these associations (Additional file 3: Table S2). Prevalence of vaginal discharge remained significantly lower in iron replete women (P = 0.013), and normal vaginal flora remained significantly less frequent in iron replete women (P = 0.028). High pH was positively associated with plasma ferritin (adjFE) (P = 0.015 adjusted for MUAC), but not the sTfR/log ferritin ratio (P = 0.14) (Additional file 3: Table S3).
Table 2

Baseline host iron status using two definitions of iron deficiency and infection markers (n = 1673, excluding 281 non-menarcheal)

InfectionNReplete (%)Deficient (%)UnadjustedAdjusteda
RR (95% CI) P valueb Nc RR (95% CI) P value
Adjusted ferritin
 BVd 13470.12713260.032
 Nugent 7–10e 1347142/1151 (12.3)15/175 (8.6)1.44 (0.87–2.39)0.16813261.53 (0.92–2.54)0.104
 Nugent 4–6e 1347108/1151 (9.4)11/175 (6.3)1.49 (0.82–2.72)0.20313261.47 (0.81–2.68)0.210
 Nugent 0–3e 1347901/1151 (78.3)149/175 (85.1)0.92 (0.86–0.99)0.03613260.92 (0.86–0.98)0.016
 Vaginal discharge167321/1430 (1.5)8/214 (3.7)0.39 (0.18–0.88)0.04416440.41 (0.18–0.92)0.030
 pH ≥ 4.51371608/1166 (52.1)86/183 (47.0)1.11 (0.94–1.31)0.20413491.11 (0.94–1.30)0.222
sTfR/log ferritin ratio > 5.6
 BVd 13470.51313240.224
 Nugent 7–10e 1347127/1030 (12.3)30/294 (10.2)1.21 (0.83–1.76)0.35813241.25 (0.86–1.83)0.239
 Nugent 4–6e 134795/1030 (9.2)24/294 (8.2)1.13 (0.74–1.73)0.64413241.12 (0.73–1.71)0.619
 Nugent 0–3e 1347808/1030 (78.4)240/294 (81.6)0.96 (0.90–1.02)0.25513240.96 (0.90–1.02)0.231
 Vaginal discharge167318/1270 (1.4)11/372 (3.0)0.48 (0.23–1.01)0.07016420.49 (0.23–1.04)0.062
 pH ≥ 4.51371551/1044 (52.8)144/303 (47.5)1.11 (0.97–1.27)0.11713471.11 (0.97–1.26)0.126

aAdjusted for MUAC

bFishers Exact Test

cNumber of observations in adjusted analysis

dGlobal test (Fishers/ordinal regression) for BV as 3-category outcome

eEach group compared to both other groups

BV bacterial vaginosis, sTfR serum transferrin receptor

Baseline host iron status using two definitions of iron deficiency and infection markers (n = 1673, excluding 281 non-menarcheal) aAdjusted for MUAC bFishers Exact Test cNumber of observations in adjusted analysis dGlobal test (Fishers/ordinal regression) for BV as 3-category outcome eEach group compared to both other groups BV bacterial vaginosis, sTfR serum transferrin receptor

Lower genital tract infection in the pregnant cohort

ANC1

Prevalence of iron deficiency (adjFE) did not differ significantly between trial arms (6.9% (iron) and 12.7% (control); RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.27–1.1, P = 0.12) or based on the sTfR/log ferritin ratio (11.1% (iron) and 12.7% (control); RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.48–1.61, P = 0.73). Prevalence was similar in iron and control arms (Table 3) for BV (7.9% vs. 6.2%; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.33–2.56, P = 0.88), intermediate flora (11.2% vs. 13.0%; P = 0.86), T. vaginalis (15.6% vs. 10.1%; P = 0.17), and vaginal discharge (8.6% vs. 7.9%; P = 0.85). Abnormal discharge occurred in 24% of women with BV and 8% of those with T. vaginalis.
Table 3

Lower genital tract infection indicators in pregnant (ANC1) and non-pregnant (FIN) cohorts by trial arm

AssessmentInfection markerNTrial armUnadjustedAdjusteda
Iron (%)Control (%)RR (95% CI) P valueb Nc RR (95% CI) P valuec
PregnantBacterial vaginosisd 2980.7762450.704
ANC1Nugent 7–10e 29812/152 (7.9)9/146 (6.2)1.28 (0.56–2.95)0.6532450.93 (0.33–2.56)0.881
N = 315Nugent 4–6e 29817/152 (11.2)19/146 (13.0)0.86 (0.47–1.59)0.7232450.94 (0.47–1.88)0.858
Nugent 0–3e 298123/152 (80.9)118/146 (80.8)1.00 (0.90–1.12)12451.03 (0.91–1.15)0.665
T. vaginalis f 28623/147 (15.6)14/139 (10.1)1.55 (0.83–2.90)0.2172861.55 (0.83–2.90)0.168
Vaginal discharge31514/163 (8.6)12/152 (7.9)1.09 (0.52–2.28)0.8413151.08 (0.51–2.25)0.846
pH ≥ 4.530992/158 (58.2)86/151 (57.0)1.02 (0.84–1.24)0.9082601.06 (0.86–1.31)0.555
Non-pregnantBacterial vaginosisd 6710.5885460.676
FINf Nugent 7–10e 67146/341 (13.5)40/330 (12.1)1.11 (0.75–1.65)0.6455460.86 (0.56–1.34)0.509
N = 877Nugent 4–6e 67135/341 (10.3)26/330 (7.9)1.30 (0.80–2.11)0.3475461.21 (0.72–2.03)0.467
Nugent 0–3e 671260/341 (76.2)264/330 (80.0)0.95 (0.88–1.03)0.2635460.99 (0.90–1.08)0.806
T. vaginalis f 71620/360 (5.6)15/356 (4.2)1.32 (0.69–2.53)0.4897161.30 (0.67–2.50)0.432
Vaginal discharge87449/425 (11.5)31/449 (6.9)1.67 (1.09–2.57)0.0198741.63 (1.06–2.51)0.026

aAdjusted for baseline infection and use of antibiotics in previous 3 months

bFishers exact test

cLogistic regression

dEach group compared to both other groups

eExcludes those less than 6 months post menarcheal

fBaseline not available

Lower genital tract infection indicators in pregnant (ANC1) and non-pregnant (FIN) cohorts by trial arm aAdjusted for baseline infection and use of antibiotics in previous 3 months bFishers exact test cLogistic regression dEach group compared to both other groups eExcludes those less than 6 months post menarcheal fBaseline not available

Lower genital tract infection in the non-pregnant cohort

FIN

Prevalence of iron deficiency (adjFE) was 9.0% (iron) and 11.0% (control) (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55–1.22, P = 0.37) and, based on sTfR/log ferritin ratio, it was 20.1% (iron) and 21.2% (control) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.73–1.23, P = 0.74). No prevalence difference was observed for BV (13.5% iron vs. 12.1% control, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56–1.34, P = 0.51), intermediate flora (10.3% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.47), or T. vaginalis (5.6% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.43) (Table 3). Vaginal discharge was more frequent in iron-supplemented women (11.5% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.026). This difference would be considered non-significant allowing for the number of secondary outcomes tested. Abnormal discharge occurred in 9% of those with BV and 18% with T. vaginalis.

Comparison of non-pregnant and pregnant cohorts

Cross-sectional BV prevalence was higher in non-pregnant women at FIN (12.8%) than at ANC1 (7.0%) (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2–2.9, P = 0.011, adjusted for antibiotic use), but T. vaginalis prevalence was lower (4.9%) (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24–0.59, P < 0.001). P. falciparum prevalence was 54% at ANC1 and 41% at FIN, despite free access to anti-malarial treatments.

Antibiotic courses

The number of antibiotic courses (excluding anti-malarials) provided to the non-pregnant cohort was higher in women receiving iron supplements (P = 0.014) (Table 4). These also received more anti-fungal treatments (P = 0.014) and analgesics (P = 0.008). BV and T. vaginalis were mostly asymptomatic and, as these infections were unlikely to account for the high proportion of women receiving antibiotics, all indications for antibiotic prescription at Health Centres were assessed (Table 5). The most frequent indications were respiratory illness, gastrointestinal, reproductive tract and local infections. Gastrointestinal infections were treated more frequently in iron-supplemented women (P = 0.005, allowing for the multiple indications tested) (Table 5). With far fewer events, no significant differences were detected in the pregnant cohort at ANC1 (Additional file 3: Table S4).
Table 4

Health Centre treatment courses prescribed to pregnant and non-pregnant cohorts by trial arm from enrolment to ANC1 (pregnant) or FIN (non-pregnant)

TreatmentNumber of treatmentsMean treatments per personMean treatments per 50 visitsa Incidence ratiob (95% CI) P value
IronControlIronControlIronControl
Pregnantn = 163n = 152Visits = 6907Visits = 6235
 Antibiotics92730.5640.4800.6660.5851.14 (0.84–1.55)0.411
 Anti-fungalsc 16150.0980.0990.1160.1200.96 (0.47–1.95)0.916
 Analgesics1071070.6560.7040.7750.8580.90 (0.69–1.18)0.454
Non-pregnantn = 426n = 451Visits =26473Visits =27633
 Antibiotics3312840.7770.6300.6250.5141.22 (1.04–1.43)0.015
 Anti-fungalsc 39210.0920.0470.0740.0381.94 (1.14–3.30)0.014
 Analgesics4814211.1290.9330.9080.7621.19 (1.05–1.36)0.008

aMean number of visits: 42 in pregnant and 63 in non-pregnant

bIncidence ratio was computed using Poisson regression with the number of visits as the exposure period

cMore than 90% of vaginal pessaries prescribed for genital tract infections

Table 5

Mean number of health centre antibiotic treatments in non-pregnant cohort by infection diagnosis and trial arm from enrolment to FIN

Infection indicationIronControlIron per 50 visitsn = 26,473Control per 50 visitsn = 27,633Incidence ratioa (95% CI) P valuePFDRb
Malariac 41280.0770.0511.53 (0.94–2.47)0.0840.278
Respiratory75870.1420.1570.90 (0.66–1.23)0.5030.719
Locald 75570.1420.1031.37 (0.97–1.94)0.0710.278
Gastrointestinale 62300.1170.0542.16 (1.39–3.34)<0.0010.005
Urinary tractf 1090.0190.0161.16 (0.47–2.86)0.7470.934
STIg 1370.0250.0131.94 (0.77–4.86)0.1580.292
Genitalh 15160.0280.0290.98 (0.48–1.98)0.9520.993
Dental1150.0210.0092.30 (0.80–6.62)0.1230.292
Meningitis0300.0050 (NA)0.9930.993
Miscellaneousi 29420.0550.0760.72 (0.45–1.16)0.1750.292

aIncidence ratio was computed using Poisson regression with the number of visits as the exposure period

b P value adjusted for multiple testing using false discovery rate method [26]

cAntibiotics in addition to anti-malarial treatment

dNon-enteric and non-respiratory, includes ear, skin, ophthalmic, abscess, wounds, local trauma, sinusitis, mastoiditis, keloid, scalp ringworm

eDysentry, typhoid, enteritis, intestinal parasitosis, gastric ulcer, gastroenteritis, diarrhoea and abdominal pain, vomiting and abdominal pain, amoebiasis, colopathy, sub-occlusion

fCystitis, dysuria

gIncludes syphilis, trichomoniasis

hUpper or lower genital infection

iItching, colic, headache, generalised or localised pain, fever, vomiting only, anaemia, anxiety, neuralgia, spasms, urticarial, plus non-infectious specific diagnoses: cancers, fertility problems, angina, self-medication, allergy, burns, renal stones, contraception, thyroid and cardiac diseases, epilepsy, filariasis, foreign body, venomous bites, fractures, migraine, HIV, varicella, mumps, prophylactic and non-classifiable: includes three uncertain descriptors, or absent statement

PFDR positive false discovery rate, STI sexually transmitted infection

Health Centre treatment courses prescribed to pregnant and non-pregnant cohorts by trial arm from enrolment to ANC1 (pregnant) or FIN (non-pregnant) aMean number of visits: 42 in pregnant and 63 in non-pregnant bIncidence ratio was computed using Poisson regression with the number of visits as the exposure period cMore than 90% of vaginal pessaries prescribed for genital tract infections Mean number of health centre antibiotic treatments in non-pregnant cohort by infection diagnosis and trial arm from enrolment to FIN aIncidence ratio was computed using Poisson regression with the number of visits as the exposure period b P value adjusted for multiple testing using false discovery rate method [26] cAntibiotics in addition to anti-malarial treatment dNon-enteric and non-respiratory, includes ear, skin, ophthalmic, abscess, wounds, local trauma, sinusitis, mastoiditis, keloid, scalp ringworm eDysentry, typhoid, enteritis, intestinal parasitosis, gastric ulcer, gastroenteritis, diarrhoea and abdominal pain, vomiting and abdominal pain, amoebiasis, colopathy, sub-occlusion fCystitis, dysuria gIncludes syphilis, trichomoniasis hUpper or lower genital infection iItching, colic, headache, generalised or localised pain, fever, vomiting only, anaemia, anxiety, neuralgia, spasms, urticarial, plus non-infectious specific diagnoses: cancers, fertility problems, angina, self-medication, allergy, burns, renal stones, contraception, thyroid and cardiac diseases, epilepsy, filariasis, foreign body, venomous bites, fractures, migraine, HIV, varicella, mumps, prophylactic and non-classifiable: includes three uncertain descriptors, or absent statement PFDR positive false discovery rate, STI sexually transmitted infection

Vaginal microbiota

Figure 2 demonstrates the distribution of the top 20 taxa for all samples combined by trial arm, study visit and BV infection. Three CSTs typified this population, corresponding to CST I (40.4%), III (24.6%) and IV (35%), dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and a mixed community with reduced lactobacilli, respectively. CST IV was more frequent in the non-pregnant cohort at FIN than pregnant women at ANC1 (P < 0.001). CST IV was associated with BV (P < 0.001) and T. vaginalis (P < 0.001) (Table 6). No differences were observed in CST IV frequency or alpha- and beta-diversity, by trial arm, or host iron status, in pregnant or non-pregnant cohorts (Additional file 4c). Iron replete women at ANC1 and FIN had non-significantly higher Shannon diversity. CST frequencies did not differ significantly from earlier results using the lower ferritin threshold (Additional file 3: Table S5).
Fig. 2

Heatmap showing distribution of the 20 most abundant taxa across all samples with coloured bars showing trial arm, study visit and BV infection

Table 6

Community state type distribution in pregnant and non-pregnant (menarcheal) cohorts by trial arm, iron deficiency and infection status

VariableVisitGroupnCST In (%)CST IIIn (%)CST IVn (%) P valuea
Trial armANC1Iron14470 (48.6)39 (27.1)35 (24.3)0.518
Control13661 (44.9)45 (33.1)30 (22.1)
FINb Iron349121 (34.7)88 (25.2)140 (40.1)0.113
Control341140 (1.1)66 (19.4)135 (9.6)
Iron deficiency, Adjusted ferritinANC1No249118 (47.4)75 (30.1)56 (22.5)0.57
Yes2710 (37.0)9 (33.3)8 (29.6)
FINb No620237 (38.2)140 (22.6)243 (39.2)0.281
Yes6520 (30.8)13 (20.0)32 (49.2)
Ratio sTfR/log ferritinANC1No247120 (48.6)74 (30.0)53 (21.5)0.216
Yes3211 (34.4)10 (31.2)11 (34.4)
FINb No544205 (37.7)124 (22.8)215 (39.5)0.81
Yes14052 (37.1)29 (20.7)59 (42.1)
Nugent scorec ANC17-10150 (0)1 (6.7)14 (93.3)<0.001
4-6317 (22.6)6 (19.4)18 (58.1)<0.001
0-3221116 (52.5)74 (33.5)31 (14.0)<0.001
FINb 7-10802 (2.5)6 (7.5)72 (90.0)<0.001
4-66011 (18.3)6 (10.0)43 (71.7)<0.001
0-3501232 (46.3)132 (26.3)137 (27.3)<0.001
T. vaginalis ANC1No243121 (49.8)73 (30.0)49 (20.2)0.006
Yes3710 (27.0)11 (29.7)16 (43.2)
FINb No655260 (39.7)149 (22.7)246 (37.6)<0.001
Yes351 (2.9)5 (14.3)29 (82.9)
High pH ≥ 4.5ANC1No12373 (59.3)37 (30.1)13 (10.6)<0.001
Yes15358 (37.9)45 (29.4)50 (32.7)
Vaginal dischargeANC1No260122 (46.9)80 (30.8)58 (22.3)0.268
Yes209 (4.5)4 (20.0)7 (35.0)
FINb No618232 (37.5)144 (23.3)242 (39.2)0.205
Yes6928 (40.6)10 (14.5)31 (44.9)
Antibiotics within previous three monthsANC1No252118 (46.8)73 (29.0)61 (24.2)NA
Yes2813 (46.4)11 (39.3)4 (14.3)
FINb No616236 (38.3)136 (22.1)244 (39.6)NA
Yes7425 (33.8)18 (24.3)31 (41.9)

a P value for association between status and CST from a multinomial regression model adjusting for antibiotic use in the 3 months prior to assessment

bMenarcheal women only

cEach Nugent group compared to the other two. BV corresponds to Nugent score 7–10

ANC1 first antenatal visit, CST community state type, FIN end assessment, sTfR serum transferrin receptor

Heatmap showing distribution of the 20 most abundant taxa across all samples with coloured bars showing trial arm, study visit and BV infection Community state type distribution in pregnant and non-pregnant (menarcheal) cohorts by trial arm, iron deficiency and infection status a P value for association between status and CST from a multinomial regression model adjusting for antibiotic use in the 3 months prior to assessment bMenarcheal women only cEach Nugent group compared to the other two. BV corresponds to Nugent score 7–10 ANC1 first antenatal visit, CST community state type, FIN end assessment, sTfR serum transferrin receptor

Discussion

In this young population, reported sexual activity was low at recruitment but its commencement carried a substantial risk of immediate pregnancy, a sexually transmitted infection (T. vaginalis), an unstable microbiota and malaria, which was more frequent in primigravidae. Evidence on effects of intermittent iron supplementation on infectious disease outcomes is scarce and unclear, with few studies and small sample sizes [15]. This randomised, controlled, double blind trial found no evidence that 60 mg iron/2.8 mg folic acid supplements offered weekly, increased the risk of BV, T. vaginalis, or CST IV microbiota in either the pregnant or non-pregnant cohort. A two-fold increased use of antibiotics for treatment of gastrointestinal infections, with increased use of anti-fungals for lower genital infection in the non-pregnant iron supplemented cohort, raises new concerns about the safety of weekly iron supplements for young women. Nutritional status, reflected by MUAC, was an effect modifier for BV infection. This result adds to a growing body of evidence of an association between diet and BV, for which there is currently no clear explanation [27]. A major strength of this study was its large cohort of non-pregnant peri-menarcheal adolescents, as well as a concurrent pregnancy cohort [16]. Some loss to follow-up occurred due to movement outside the study area following marriage, unwanted pregnancy or, if unmarried, working for relatives living elsewhere. Trial participants were young, nulliparous girls, with low prevalence of iron deficiency at recruitment. Accurate estimation of iron deficiency prevalence is influenced by effects of inflammation on indices such as ferritin. A recent meta-analysis in women of reproductive age experiencing inflammation estimated the difference of depleted iron stores between adjusted and unadjusted ferritin values as 2–8 median percentage points, dependent on the adjustment method [28]. We used a high ferritin cut-off of < 70 μg/L for iron deficiency in women with CRP ≥ 10 μg/mL, allowing for inflammation, as well as the lower cut-off < 15 μg/L with CRP < 10 μg/L to include those without inflammation. CRP concentration increases in early pregnancy, which was accommodated by using the CRP < 10 μg/L cut-off. Although prevalence of iron deficiency in absolute terms varied according to the CRP cut-off used, sensitivity analyses showed that trends and trial arm differences in iron deficiency were similar irrespective of CRP level. We additionally used the sTfR/log10 ferritin ratio > 5.6, which is derived from an intermediate ferritin cut-off of < 30 μg/L [22]. We considered this provided a reasonable estimate of iron deficiency. Sensitivity analysis of alternative ferritin thresholds for defining iron deficiency, adjusting for inflammation, gave very similar results. Despite good supplementation adherence over an 18 month period, facilitated by weekly direct observation, there was no significant improvement in systemic iron biomarkers. The absence of an association between iron supplementation and BV or T. vaginalis prevalence could relate to the lack of intervention efficacy in reducing iron deficiency. At baseline, iron-replete participants were less likely to have normal vaginal flora, which suggests host iron status is reflected in the mucosa. Following supplementation, an increased prescription for fungal infections was also observed inferring an iron-fungal infection interaction [29]. Antibiotics used for treatment of enteric infections may have altered lower genital tract bacterial profiles. Cessation of menses with pregnancy would also reduce iron availability to haem-utilising pathogens. Chronic inflammation from malaria, which was frequent, as well as other infections, would increase hepcidin release, restricting iron absorption. In Beninese women with afebrile P. falciparum parasitaemia, dietary iron absorption was reduced by approximately 40% with infection [30]. In the non-pregnant cohort, a significantly higher number of antibiotic-treated gastrointestinal infections – predominantly diagnosed as dysentery, typhoid, and intestinal parasitosis – occurred in supplemented women, possibly related to unabsorbed iron becoming available to colonic gut microbiota [30]. Although some misclassification of infection categories would arise due to a lack of laboratory confirmation, this should not alter findings by trial arm. Increased gut inflammation and pathogenicity following iron supplementation, or fortification, is reported in children exposed to high infection pressure in Ghana [31] and Kenya [32], and increased risk of bloody dysentery and respiratory infection in Pakistan [33]. This is the first report in young women to show increased enteric symptoms requiring antibiotic treatments following iron supplementation. Concurrent infection with non-typhi salmonella and P. falciparum should be considered [34]. Increased use of antifungal prescriptions in the iron-supplemented non-pregnant cohort is of interest because, both in the gut and vaginal mucosa, C. albicans is a normal commensal, competing with other organisms for nutrients, and increased fungal virulence due to iron malabsorption could be anticipated. In addition, disruption to normal bacterial gut populations due to tetracycline treatment can result in candida overgrowth, reducing colonisation resistance [35]. The intestinal tract is considered as a reservoir of infection leading to recurrent vaginal candidiasis based on the correspondence between vaginal and stool samples [36]. Self-taken vaginal swabs proved acceptable, providing samples for gram stains, vaginal eluates and microbiota assays. The absence of differences in microbiota CST categories by trial arm is consistent with no supplementation effect on BV or T. vaginalis. BV was associated with CST IV, and both had lower prevalence in pregnant than non-pregnant women [37]. This pregnancy difference is probably related to hormonal factors [38], although we cannot exclude the possibility that it is mediated by differences in other characteristics between those who became pregnant and those that did not. In marked contrast, T. vaginalis prevalence, also associated with CST IV, was three-fold higher at ANC1 compared to non-pregnant women at FIN, probably due to more regular sexual activity with male partners untreated for this sexually transmitted infection. Interactions between BV and T. vaginalis are poorly understood [39] but, under experimental conditions, T. vaginalis is associated with reduced populations of Lactobacillus spp, but not BV spp [40]. Co-infection in early pregnancy may hinder transition to stable microbiome communities, such as CST I, which is associated with better pregnancy outcomes [41]. Clinical outcomes may depend on initial host iron status, as experimental studies have shown altered inflammatory responses, higher abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae and Lactobacillaceae, and prolonged intestinal nematode survival in animals receiving iron-deficient diets [42]. At baseline, elevated vaginal pH values (≥4.5) were observed in iron-replete participants and were positively associated with plasma ferritin (P = 0.015). High vaginal pH may be attributable to normal pubertal changes [43], young age, irregular menses [44], and factors impacting on lactobacilli or other lactic acid producing microbes [45], but also to genital tract infection. The reason in this study for the significant association of high pH and more disturbed flora in adolescents with better iron stores before supplementation is unknown and warrants further investigation.

Conclusions

There was no evidence that weekly iron increased the risk of BV or T. vaginalis infections, but the intervention was considered poorly absorbed as systemic iron biomarkers were not significantly changed. Iron supplementation did result in more gastrointestinal morbidity, leading to increased antibiotic prescription and genital tract infection requiring antifungal treatments in the non-pregnant cohort. This is a concern since recently revised WHO recommendations are shifting in favour of providing intermittent daily iron [46]. A daily regime could be more likely to exacerbate gut microbes and/or increase antibiotic/antifungal prescriptions. Since malaria is the most likely cause of iron malabsorption in the gut, iron supplementation studies in malaria endemic areas need to profile enteric and vaginal infections, as well as antibiotic use. Background data to the main RCT. (DOCX 18 kb) Detailed methods for microbiota and T. vaginalis qPCR profiling. (DOCX 13 kb) Tables not shown in Results. (DOCX 49 kb) (a) Legend to Additional figures; (b) CRP sensitivity analysis and iron deficiency; (c) Figure Shannon Diversity (microbiota results). (ZIP 116 kb)
  41 in total

1.  A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development.

Authors:  Pradeep K Singh; Matthew R Parsek; E Peter Greenberg; Michael J Welsh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Afebrile Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia decreases absorption of fortification iron but does not affect systemic iron utilization: a double stable-isotope study in young Beninese women.

Authors:  Colin I Cercamondi; Ines M Egli; Ella Ahouandjinou; Romain Dossa; Christophe Zeder; Lamidhi Salami; Harold Tjalsma; Erwin Wiegerinck; Toshihiko Tanno; Richard F Hurrell; Joseph Hounhouigan; Michael B Zimmermann
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Iron acquisition in fungal pathogens of humans.

Authors:  Gaurav Bairwa; Won Hee Jung; James W Kronstad
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.526

4.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Proteomic analysis of human cervical-vaginal fluids.

Authors:  Li-Jun Tang; Francesco De Seta; Federico Odreman; Per Venge; Caterina Piva; Secondo Guaschino; Rodolfo C Garcia
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou; Nicolas Nagot; Marie-Christine Defer; Seydou Yaro; Nicolas Meda; Annie Robert
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 7.  The vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology.

Authors:  Steven B Smith; Jacques Ravel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition from transferrin by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  S Sriyosachati; C D Cox
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Real-time PCR improves detection of Trichomonas vaginalis infection compared with culture using self-collected vaginal swabs.

Authors:  A M Caliendo; J A Jordan; A M Green; J Ingersoll; R J Diclemente; G M Wingood
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09

Review 10.  Adjusting ferritin concentrations for inflammation: Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) project.

Authors:  Sorrel Ml Namaste; Fabian Rohner; Jin Huang; Nivedita L Bhushan; Rafael Flores-Ayala; Roland Kupka; Zuguo Mei; Rahul Rawat; Anne M Williams; Daniel J Raiten; Christine A Northrop-Clewes; Parminder S Suchdev
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis and their associated risk factors among pregnant women from northern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gebrehiwet Tesfay Yalew; Saravanan Muthupandian; Kiflom Hagos; Letemichael Negash; Gopinath Venkatraman; Yemane Mengsteab Hagos; Hadush Negash Meles; Hagos Haileslasie Weldehaweriat; Hussein O M Al-Dahmoshi; Morteza Saki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Iron Status of Burkinabé Adolescent Girls Predicts Malaria Risk in the Following Rainy Season.

Authors:  Loretta Brabin; Stephen A Roberts; Halidou Tinto; Sabine Gies; Salou Diallo; Bernard Brabin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Iron deficiency during pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk of adverse birth outcomes in a malaria-endemic area in a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Freya J I Fowkes; Kerryn A Moore; D Herbert Opi; Julie A Simpson; Freya Langham; Danielle I Stanisic; Alice Ura; Christopher L King; Peter M Siba; Ivo Mueller; Stephen J Rogerson; James G Beeson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Effects of Weekly Iron and Folic Acid Supplements on Malaria Risk in Nulliparous Women in Burkina Faso: A Periconceptional, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Sabine Gies; Salou Diallo; Stephen A Roberts; Adama Kazienga; Matthew Powney; Loretta Brabin; Sayouba Ouedraogo; Dorine W Swinkels; Anneke J Geurts-Moespot; Yves Claeys; Umberto D'Alessandro; Halidou Tinto; Brian Faragher; Bernard Brabin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Excess risk of preterm birth with periconceptional iron supplementation in a malaria endemic area: analysis of secondary data on birth outcomes in a double blind randomized controlled safety trial in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Bernard Brabin; Sabine Gies; Stephen A Roberts; Salou Diallo; Olga M Lompo; Adama Kazienga; Loretta Brabin; Sayouba Ouedraogo; Halidou Tinto
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Mucosal lactoferrin response to genital tract infections is associated with iron and nutritional biomarkers in young Burkinabé women.

Authors:  S A Roberts; L Brabin; S Diallo; S Gies; A Nelson; C Stewart; D W Swinkels; A J Geurts-Moespot; A Kazienga; S Ouedraogo; U D'Alessandro; H Tinto; B J Brabin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Associations between dietary micronutrient intake and molecular-Bacterial Vaginosis.

Authors:  Susan Tuddenham; Khalil G Ghanem; Laura E Caulfield; Alisha J Rovner; Courtney Robinson; Rupak Shivakoti; Ryan Miller; Anne Burke; Catherine Murphy; Jacques Ravel; Rebecca M Brotman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Testing an infection model to explain excess risk of preterm birth with long-term iron supplementation in a malaria endemic area.

Authors:  Bernard Brabin; Halidou Tinto; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Risk of malaria in young children after periconceptional iron supplementation.

Authors:  Sabine Gies; Stephen A Roberts; Salou Diallo; Olga M Lompo; Halidou Tinto; Bernard J Brabin
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Community approval required for periconceptional adolescent adherence to weekly iron and/or folic acid supplementation: a qualitative study in rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Adélaïde Compaoré; Sabine Gies; Bernard Brabin; Halidou Tinto; Loretta Brabin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.