| Literature DB >> 29166854 |
Li-Jun An1,2, Yang Zhang2, Zheng Su2, Xian-Long Zhang2, Hai-Lin Liu2, Zhi-Jie Zhang2, Jian-Lin Hu1, Shi-Tong Li3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergence agitation (EA) is a common phenomenon in preschool children during emergence from general anesthesia. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of dezocine for emergence agitation in preschool children anesthetized with sevoflurane-remifentanil.Entities:
Keywords: Dezocine; Emergence agitation; Preschool children; Sevoflurane-remifentanil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29166854 PMCID: PMC5700567 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0446-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
Fig. 1CONSORT diagram. A total of 100 children were enrolled the study and allocated into two equal groups. Two children were lost to follow up, one because of bilateral inguinal hernia, the other due to laryngospasm after extubation and the use of muscle relaxant
Patients baseline demographic and clinical characteristics
| Group C (n = 49) | Group D (n = 49) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 4.9 ± 1.6 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 0.067 |
| Sex (M/F) | 29/20 | 26/23 | 0.541 |
| Weight (kg) | 18.4 ± 3.1 | 17.5 ± 4.3 | 0.238 |
| Height (cm) | 78.3 ± 10.2 | 80.5 ± 12.3 | 0.338 |
| BMI | 19.5 ± 3.2 | 20.1 ± 2.8 | 0.326 |
| ASA (I/II) | 46/3 | 46/3 | 1.000 |
| Duration of surgery (min) | 35.1 ± 6.9 | 36.8 ± 8.0 | 0.263 |
Data are presented as numbers or mean ± SD. Group C = Ringer’s lactate, Group D = dezocine 0.1 mg/kg. M: male, F: female. BMI: Body Mass Index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologist
Emergence agitation and recovery profiles
| Group C (n = 49) | Group D ( | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to extubation (min) | 8.1 ± 1.6 | 8.6 ± 1.4 | 0.103 |
| Time from extubation to emergence (min) | 13.5 ± 2.1 | 14.1 ± 1.7 | 0.123 |
| Discharged from PACU (min) | 46.4 ± 8.7 | 36.5 ± 9.3 | 4.032 |
| Incidence of EA by PAED scale score ≥ 10 (%) | 42 (86%) | 13 (27%) | <0.0001 |
| PAED score ≥ 10 (moderate EA) | 5 (12%) | 7 (54%) | <0.0001 |
| PAED score ≥ 13 (severe EA) | 37 (88%) | 6 (45%) | <0.0001 |
| CHIPPS pain score | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 |
| EA rescued by fentanyl | 9 (18%) | 2 (4%) | 0.025 |
| EA rescued by propofol | 10 (20%) | 0 (0%) | 0.001 |
| Ramsay sedation score | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.533 |
| Desaturation | 0 | 0 | |
| Nausea | 0 | 0 | |
| Vomiting | 0 | 0 | |
| Headache | 0 | 0 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD, percentages. EA Emergent agitation, PAED Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium, PACU Post-anesthetic care unit
Fig. 2Distribution of PAED scores
Fig. 3Ramsey sedation scores for individual patients. The registration information can be found on the following website: http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx