Literature DB >> 29166702

Impact of active cancer disease on the outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Norman Mangner1, Felix J Woitek1, Stephan Haussig1, David Holzhey2, Georg Stachel1, Florian Schlotter1, Robert Höllriegel1, Friedrich W Mohr3, Gerhard Schuler1, Axel Linke1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are often characterized by risk factors not reflected in conventional risk scores. In this context, little is known about the outcome of patients suffering from an active cancer disease (ACD). The objective was to determine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and mortality of patients with ACD undergoing TAVR compared to those with a history of cancer (HCD) and controls without known tumor disease.
METHODS: TAVR patients between 02/2006 and 09/2014 were stratified according to the presence of ACD, HCD, and control. All-cause-mortality at 1-year was the primary end point. All end point definitions were subject to the Valve Academic Research Consortium II definitions.
RESULTS: Overall, 1821 patients were included: 99 patients (5.4%) suffered from ACD and 251 patients (13.8%) had HCD. ACD was related to a solid organ or hematological source in 72.7% and 27.3%, respectively. Patients with ACD were more often male (P = 0.004) and had a lower logisticEuroScore I (P = 0.033). Overall rates of VARC-II defined periprocedural myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding, access-site complications, and acute kidney injury were not different between groups. Thirty-day mortality did not differ between patients with ACD, HCD, and controls (6.1% vs 4.4% vs 7.6%, P = 0.176). All-cause 1-year mortality was higher in patients with ACD compared HCD and controls (37.4% vs 16.4% vs 20.8%, P < 0.001). ACD was an independent predictor of all-cause 1-year mortality (HR 2.10, 95%-CI 1.41-3.13, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The presence of ACD in patients undergoing TAVR is associated with significantly higher 1-year mortality.
© 2017, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAVR; aortic stenosis; cancer; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29166702     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  16 in total

Review 1.  The Onco-cardiologist Dilemma: to Implant, to Defer, or to Avoid Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Cancer Patients with Aortic Stenosis?

Authors:  Serban Mihai Balanescu; Dinu Valentin Balanescu; Teodora Donisan; Eric H Yang; Nicolas Palaskas; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Saamir Hassan; Peter Kim; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Biswajit Kar; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meer Rabeel Zafar; Syed Farrukh Mustafa; Timothy W Miller; Talal Alkhawlani; Umesh C Sharma
Journal:  Cardiooncology       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 3.  Interventional Strategies in Cancer-induced Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Bala Pushparaji; Teodora Donisan; Dinu V Balanescu; Nicolas Palaskas; Peter Kim; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Saamir A Hassan; Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar; Cezar A Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in active cancer patients and cancer survivors.

Authors:  Bilge Duran Karaduman; Hüseyin Ayhan; Telat Keleş; Engin Bozkurt
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 0.332

5.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an elderly patient with severe aortic stenosis and pancreas cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Ryo Imada; Teruo Komakata; Bibek Aryal; Nobuhiro Tada; Kensuke Nuruki; Tetsuro Kataoka; Kiyohisa Hiramine; Kosuke Mukaihara; Tamahiro Kinjo
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-21

6.  Impact of Cancer in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Alexander Lind; Matthias Totzeck; Amir A Mahabadi; Rolf A Jánosi; Mohamed El Gabry; Arjang Ruhparwar; Simone M Mrotzek; Lena Hinrichs; Merve Akdeniz; Tienush Rassaf; Raluca I Mincu
Journal:  JACC CardioOncol       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and active cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Bendary; Ahmed Ramzy; Mohamed Bendary; Mohamed Salem
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-03-11

8.  Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Avirup Guha; Amit K Dey; Sameer Arora; Matthew A Cavender; John P Vavalle; Joseph F Sabik; Ernesto Jimenez; Hani Jneid; Daniel Addison
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Cardio-Oncology at the Beginning of a New Decade.

Authors:  Isabella M Grumbach
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  TAVR and cancer: machine learning-augmented propensity score mortality and cost analysis in over 30 million patients.

Authors:  Dominique J Monlezun; Logan Hostetter; Prakash Balan; Nicolas Palaskas; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Zaza Iakobishvili; Michael Ewer; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Cardiooncology       Date:  2021-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.