M Kobaek-Larsen1,2, R Kroijer1,2, A-K Dyrvig1,2,3, M M Buijs1,2, R J C Steele4, N Qvist1,2, G Baatrup1,2. 1. Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 2. Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 3. OPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 4. Dundee University Hospital and National Screening Centre, Dundee, UK.
Abstract
AIM: The aim was to determine the polyp detection rate and per-patient sensitivity for polyps > 9 mm of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) compared with colonoscopy as well as the diagnostic accuracy of CCE. METHOD: Individuals who had a positive immunochemical faecal occult blood test during screening had investigator blinded CCE and colonoscopy. Participants underwent repeat endoscopy if significant lesions detected by CCE were considered to have been missed by colonoscopy. RESULTS: There were 253 participants. The polyp detection rate was significantly higher in CCE compared with colonoscopy (P = 0.02). The per-patient sensitivity for > 9 mm polyps for CCE and colonoscopy was 87% (95% CI: 83-91%) and 88% (95% CI: 84-92%) respectively. In participants with complete CCE and colonoscopy examinations (N = 126), per-patient sensitivity of > 9 mm polyps in CCE (97%; 95% CI: 94-100%) was superior to colonoscopy (89%; 95% CI: 84-94%). A complete capsule endoscopy examination (N = 134) could detect patients with intermediate or greater risk (according to the European guidelines) with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positivity rate of 79%, 93%, 69% and 58% respectively, using a cut-off of at least one polyp > 10 mm or more than two polyps. CONCLUSION: CCE is superior to colonoscopy in polyp detection rate and per-patient sensitivity to > 9 mm polyps, but only in complete CCE examinations. The rate of incomplete CCE examinations must be improved. Colorectal Disease
AIM: The aim was to determine the polyp detection rate and per-patient sensitivity for polyps > 9 mm of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) compared with colonoscopy as well as the diagnostic accuracy of CCE. METHOD: Individuals who had a positive immunochemical faecal occult blood test during screening had investigator blinded CCE and colonoscopy. Participants underwent repeat endoscopy if significant lesions detected by CCE were considered to have been missed by colonoscopy. RESULTS: There were 253 participants. The polyp detection rate was significantly higher in CCE compared with colonoscopy (P = 0.02). The per-patient sensitivity for > 9 mm polyps for CCE and colonoscopy was 87% (95% CI: 83-91%) and 88% (95% CI: 84-92%) respectively. In participants with complete CCE and colonoscopy examinations (N = 126), per-patient sensitivity of > 9 mm polyps in CCE (97%; 95% CI: 94-100%) was superior to colonoscopy (89%; 95% CI: 84-94%). A complete capsule endoscopy examination (N = 134) could detect patients with intermediate or greater risk (according to the European guidelines) with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positivity rate of 79%, 93%, 69% and 58% respectively, using a cut-off of at least one polyp > 10 mm or more than two polyps. CONCLUSION:CCE is superior to colonoscopy in polyp detection rate and per-patient sensitivity to > 9 mm polyps, but only in complete CCE examinations. The rate of incomplete CCE examinations must be improved. Colorectal Disease
Authors: Sarah Moen; Fanny E R Vuik; Trudy Voortman; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon C W Spaander Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: U Deding; J Herp; A-L Havshoei; M Kobaek-Larsen; M M Buijs; E S Nadimi; G Baatrup Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Johannes Hausmann; Jan-Peter Linke; Jörg G Albert; Johannes Masseli; Andrea Tal; Alica Kubesch; Natalie Filmann; Michael Philipper; Michael Farnbacher Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Michal Voska; Miroslav Zavoral; Tomas Grega; Ondrej Majek; Jan Martinek; Ilja Tacheci; Marek Benes; Gabriela Vojtechova; Pavel Drastich; Jan Bures; Julius Spicak; Barbora Buckova; Ondrej Ngo; Stepan Suchanek Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: Mohd Syafiq Ismail; Serhiy Semenov; Sandeep Sihag; Thilagaraj Manoharan; Atiyekeogbebe Rita Douglas; Phyllis Reill; Michael Kelly; Gerard Boran; Anthony O'Connor; Niall Breslin; Sarah O'Donnell; Barbara Ryan; Deirdre McNamara Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2021-05-27
Authors: Maria Magdalena Buijs; Mohammed Hossain Ramezani; Jürgen Herp; Rasmus Kroijer; Morten Kobaek-Larsen; Gunnar Baatrup; Esmaeil S Nadimi Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2018-08-10