| Literature DB >> 29166443 |
Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider1, Susana Cararo Confortin2, Carla de Oliveira Bernardo3, Carolina Carvalho Bolsoni2, Danielle Ledur Antes4, Karine Gonçalves Pereira2, Lariane Mortean Ono5, Larissa Pruner Marques2, Lucélia Justino Borges6, Maruí Weber Corseuil Giehl1, Rodrigo de Rosso Krug5, Vanessa Fernanda Goes7, Alexandra Crispim Boing8, Antônio Fernando Boing8, Eleonora d'Orsi8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the sample plan, operational aspects, and strategies used in the 2009/2010 and 2013/2014 EpiFloripa Aging Study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29166443 PMCID: PMC5697918 DOI: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Saude Publica ISSN: 0034-8910 Impact factor: 2.106
FigureResponse rate per decile of average income of the head of the family of the census tract. EpiFloripa Aging, Florianópolis, State of Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2000.
Comparison of the percentage distribution of older adults according to age groups, by gender, of the 2010 IBGE Census and the Study EpiFloripa Aging.
| Age group (years) | Female | Male | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| IBGE | EpiFloripa | IBGE | EpiFloripa | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| % | % (95%CI) | % | % (95%CI) | |
| 60 to 64 | 32.3 | 27.0 (23.9–30.4)* | 37.2 | 29.8 (24.8–35.5)* |
| 65 to 69 | 21.9 | 21.6 (18.7–24.9) | 24.0 | 24.1 (20.4–28.1) |
| 70 to 74 | 16.6 | 20.0 (17.7–22.6)* | 17.4 | 18.7 (15.4–22.5) |
| 75 to 79 | 12.5 | 16.5 (13.8–19.5)* | 10.9 | 15.3 (11.6–20.0)* |
| 80 to 84 | 8.9 | 8.3 (6.1–11.2) | 6.6 | 7.2 (5.2–9.9) |
| 85 to 89 | 4.9 | 4.0 (2.9–5.4) | 2.8 | 3.4 (2.1–5.4) |
| 90 to 94 | 2.0 | 2.1 (1.1–3.9) | 0.9 | 0.7 (0.2–2.1) |
| 95 to 99 | 0.6 | 0.3 (0.1–0.8) | 0.2 | 0.6 (0.2–2.1) |
| 100 or more | 0.1 | 0.2 (0.0–0.6) | 0 | 0.1 (0.0–0.9) |
* Value significantly different from the 2010 IBGE Census data.
Description of the sample interviewed in 2009/2010, and follow-up in 2013/2014. EpiFloripa Aging, Florianópolis, State of Santa Catarina, Brazil.
| Variable | Response rate | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| First wave | Second wave | ||||
|
|
| ||||
| n | % | n | % | ||
| Sex | 0.553 | ||||
| Female | 1,088 | 63.9 | 778 | 71.5 | |
| Male | 614 | 36.1 | 419 | 68.2 | |
| Total | 1,702 | 100 | 1,197 | 70.3 | |
| Age group (years) | 0.003 | ||||
| 60 to 69 | 848 | 49.8 | 642 | 75.7 | |
| 70 to 79 | 615 | 36.1 | 436 | 70.9 | |
| 80 or more | 239 | 14.0 | 119 | 49.8 | |
| Total | 1,702 | 100 | 1,192 | 70.0 | |
| Marital status | 0.740 | ||||
| Married | 990 | 58.2 | 718 | 72.5 | |
| Single | 99 | 5.8 | 72 | 72.7 | |
| Divorced/Separated | 132 | 7.8 | 88 | 66.7 | |
| Widow | 481 | 28.3 | 319 | 66.3 | |
| Total | 1,702 | 100 | 1,197 | 70.3 | |
|
| 0.753 | ||||
| Lower quartile | 426 | 25.0 | 298 | 70.0 | |
| 2nd Quartile | 435 | 25.6 | 288 | 66.2 | |
| 3rd Quartile | 424 | 24.9 | 301 | 71.0 | |
| Higher Quartile | 417 | 24.5 | 310 | 74.3 | |
| Total | 1,702 | 100 | 1,197 | 70.3 | |
| Education level | 0.445 | ||||
| No education | 158 | 9.3 | 93 | 58.9 | |
| 1 to 4 years | 595 | 35.1 | 430 | 72.3 | |
| 5 to 8 years | 307 | 18.1 | 199 | 64.8 | |
| 9 to 11 years | 241 | 14.2 | 180 | 74.7 | |
| 12 years or more | 339 | 23.2 | 292 | 86.1 | |
| Total | 1,694 | 100 | 1,194 | 70.5 | |
| Cognitive impairment | 0.923 | ||||
| Absence of probable cognitive impairment | 1,244 | 73.7 | 875 | 70.3 | |
| Presence of probable cognitive impairment | 443 | 26.3 | 309 | 69.8 | |
| Total | 1,690 | 100 | 1,184 | 70.1 | |
| Dependence on Activities of Daily Living (ADL) | 0.068 | ||||
| Zero | 457 | 26.9 | 336 | 73.5 | |
| 1 to 3 | 708 | 41.6 | 531 | 75.0 | |
| 4 or more | 537 | 31.6 | 330 | 61.5 | |
| Total | 1,702 | 100 | 1,197 | 70.3 | |
Investigated by the Mini-Mental State Examination , categorized according to Almeida .
Evaluated using the Brazilian Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire adapted from the questionnaire Old Americans Resources and Services (BOMFAQ/OARS), categorized according to Rosa et al.