| Literature DB >> 29165394 |
Jacek Rogowski1, Mariusz Andrzejczuk2, Joanna Berlowska3, Michal Binczarski4, Dorota Kregiel5, Andrzej Kubiak6, Magdalena Modelska7, Elzbieta Szubiakiewicz8, Andrei Stanishevsky9, Jolanta Tomaszewska10, Izabela Alina Witonska11.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of the addition of tungsten on the structure, phase composition, textural properties and activities of β-SiC-based catalysts in the aqueous phase hydrogenation of furfural. Carbothermal reduction of SiO₂ in the presence of WO₃ at 1550 °C in argon resulted in the formation of WxC-β-SiC nanocomposite powders with significant variations in particle morphology and content of WxC-tipped β-SiC nano-whiskers, as revealed by TEM and SEM-EDS. The specific surface area (SSA) of the nanocomposite strongly depended on the amount of tungsten and had a notable impact on its catalytic properties for the production of furfuryl alcohol (FA) and tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA). Nanocomposite WxC-β-SiC catalysts with 10 wt % W in the starting mixture had the highest SSA and the smallest WxC crystallites. Some 10 wt % W nanocomposite catalysts demonstrated up to 90% yield of THFA, in particular in the reduction of furfural derived from biomass, although the reproducible performance of such catalysts has yet to be achieved.Entities:
Keywords: furfural; furfuryl alcohol; hydrogenation; nanostructured catalyst; tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29165394 PMCID: PMC6150273 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22112033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Conversion of furfural and yields of FA and THFA after the 2 h hydrogenation of furfural over β-SiC and WxC-β-SiC catalysts. The results in the table are expressed as the arithmetic mean of a minimum of three measurements.
| Catalyst | Furfural Conversion (%) | Yield (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | THFA | Other Products * | ||
| β-SiC | 100 | 54.8 | 43.2 | 0 |
| (5)WxC-β-SiC | 100 | 49.7 | 48.9 | 1.3 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC | 100 | 8.4 | 90.5 | 1.1 |
| (20)WxC-β-SiC | 67.6 | 42.2 | 24.6 | 0.3 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(A) | 100 | 53.2 | 46.8 | 0.4 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(B) | 69.4 | 58.1 | 11.3 | 0.1 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(C) | 35.1 | 29.6 | 5.9 | 0.2 |
| β-SiC(A) | 71.9 | 53.9 | 18.0 | 0.5 |
| β-SiC(B) | 73.4 | 60.7 | 12.7 | 0.3 |
* Other products: THF, MTHF, products of condensation of FA (mainly 5-fufuryl-furfuryl alcohol, but also 2,2′-difurylmethane, 2-(2-furylmethyl)-5-methylfuran, difurfuryl ether, 4-furfuryl-2-pentenoic acid γ-lactone, 2,5-difurfurylfuran and 2,2′-(furylmethylene)bis(5-methylfuran)). Conditions of the reaction: Cfurfural = 0.1 M, mcat = 0.5 g, T = 90 °C, Vfurfural = 25 mL, pH = 20 bar. (The numbers in round brackets (5), (10) and (20) show the amounts of W in the catalysts).
Average crystallite size in WxC-β-SiC-type nanocomposites.
| Catalyst | Temp. of Carbothermal Reduction (°C) | Time of Carbothermal Reduction (h) | Crystalline Phases | Size of SiC Crystallites (nm) | Size of WC Crystallites (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-SiC, | 1550 | 1.5 | β-SiC, SiO2 | 36 | - |
| (5)WxC-β-SiC | 1550 | 1.5 | β-SiC,SiC, WC, W2C, SiO2 | 37 | 50 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC | 1550 | 1.5 | β-SiC,SiC, WC, W2C, SiO2 | 23 | 32 |
| (20)WxC-β-SiC | 1550 | 1.5 | β-SiC,SiC, WC, W2C, SiO2 | 18 | 47 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(A) | 1550 | 3.0 | β-SiC,SiC, WC, W2C | 35 | 37 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(B) | 1550 | 4.5 | β-SiC,SiC, WC, W2C | 37 | 42 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(C) | 1550 | 1.5 | β-SiC,SiC, WC, W2C | 25 | 23 |
| β-SiC(A) | 1550 | 3.0 | β-SiC | 36 | - |
| β-SiC(B) | 1550 | 1.5 | β-SiC | 20 | - |
(The numbers in round brackets (5), (10) and (20) show the amounts of W in the catalysts).
Figure 1The XRD patterns of nanocomposite samples: (A) β-SiC; (B) (5)WxC-β-SiC; (C) (10)WxC-β-SiC and (D) (20)WxC-β-SiC. Crystalline phases: ▲—β-SiC, ●—WC, ◆—W2C, ■ cristobalite, ○ amorphous carbon. (The numbers in round brackets (5), (10) and (20) show the amounts of W in the catalysts).
Specific surface areas and textural properties of the catalysts used in the experiments.
| Catalyst | W wt % in the Starting Mixture | Surface Area (m2/g) | Total Pore Volume (cm3/g) | Average Pore Radius (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-SiC | 0 | 9.6 | 0.034 | 8.59 |
| (5)WxC-β-SiC | 5 | 45.4 | 0.145 | 6.17 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC | 10 | 57.4 | 0.184 | 6.10 |
| (20)WxC-β-SiC | 20 | 10.0 | 0.035 | 6.67 |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(A) | 10 | 29.2 | - | - |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(B) | 10 | 24.9 | - | - |
| (10)WxC-β-SiC(C) | 10 | 31.0 | - | - |
| β-SiC(A) | 0 | 9.6 | - | - |
| β-SiC(B) | 0 | 11.2 | - | - |
(The numbers in round brackets (5), (10) and (20) show the amounts of W in the catalysts).
Figure 2Low magnification SEM micrographs of the nanocomposites: (A) β-SiC; (B) (5)WxC-β-SiC; (C) (10)WxC-β-SiC and (D) (20)WxC-β-SiC. (The numbers in round brackets (5), (10) and (20) show the amounts of W in the catalysts).
Figure 3SEM/EDS analysis of the β-SiC nanocomposite obtained by thermal reduction of SiO2 by graphitized carbon at 1550 °C for 1.5 h (A) SEM image, (B) EDS analysis of granular structure (point 1).
Figure 4SEM/EDS analysis of the WxC-β-SiC nanocomposites obtained by thermal reduction of a mixture of WO3 and SiO2 by graphitized carbon at 1550 °C for 1.5 h: (A) SEM and EDS spectra of (5)WxC-β-SiC catalyst and (B) SEM and EDS spectra of (10)WxC-β-SiC catalyst. (The numbers in round brackets (5) and (10) show the amounts of W in the catalysts).
Figure 5STEM images of a whisker in (10)WxC-β-SiC catalyst: (A) BF-STEM image and BF-STEM image with contrast; (B) BF-TEM image and EDS element maps of the whisker.
Figure 6BF-TEM image (A) and EDS element maps (B) of (10)WxC-β-SiC composite.
Figure 7High Resolution STEM image of the whisker stem.
Figure 8FTIR spectra for (A) β-SiC; (B) (5)WxC-β-SiC; (C) (10)WxC-β-SiC and (D) (20)WxC-β-SiC catalyst. (The numbers in round brackets (5), (10) and (20) show the amounts of W in the catalysts).
Catalytic properties of (10)WxC-β-SiC catalysts after 2 h of bio-furfural reduction. The results in the table are expressed as the arithmetic mean of a minimum of three measurements.
| Origin of Furfural | Furfural Concentration (mol·L−1) | Conversion of Furfural (%) | Yield (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | THFA | Other Products * | |||
| COMMERCIAL, POCh Gliwice S.A. | 0.10 | 100 | 8.4 | 90.5 | 1.1 |
| Acidic hydrolysis of oat straw | 0.11 | 100 | 8.6 | 89.9 | 1.5 |
| Acidic hydrolysis of flax straw | 0.08 | 100 | 7.1 | 92.3 | 0.6 |
| Acidic hydrolysis of sugar beet pulp | 0.06 | 100 | 9.1 | 89.8 | 1.1 |
| Acidic hydrolysis of sugar beet leaves | 0.02 | 100 | 10.5 | 86.2 | 3.3 |
* Other products: THF, MTHF, products of condensation of FA (mainly 5-fufuryl-furfuryl alcohol, but also 2,2′-difurylmethane, 2-(2-furylmethyl)-5-methylfuran, difurfuryl ether, 4-furfuryl-2-pentenoic acid γ-lactone, 2,5-difurfurylfuran and 2,2′-(furylmethylene)bis(5-methylfuran)). Conditions of the reaction: Cfurfural = 0.1 M, mcat = 0.5 g, T = 90 °C, Vfurfural = 25 mL, pH = 20 bar.