| Literature DB >> 29165362 |
Yiqing Wang1, Mingyuan Zhu2, Gang Wang3,4,5, Bin Dai6, Feng Yu7, Zhiqun Tian8, Xuhong Guo9,10.
Abstract
The development of effective oxygen electrode catalysts for renewable energy technologies such as metal-air batteries and fuel cells remains challenging. Here, we prepared a novel high-performance oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalyst comprised of Fe₂N nanoparticles (NPs) in situ decorated over an N-doped porous carbon derived from pomelo peel (i.e., Fe₂N/N-PPC). The decorated Fe₂N NPs provided large quantities of Fe-N-C bonding catalytic sites. The as-obtained Fe₂N/N-PPC showed superior onset and half-wave potentials (0.966 and 0.891 V, respectively) in alkaline media (0.1 M KOH) compared to commercial Pt/C through a direct four-electron reaction pathway. Fe₂N/N-PPC also showed better stability and methanol tolerance than commercial Pt/C. The outstanding ORR performance of Fe₂N/N-PPC was attributed to its high specific surface area and the synergistic effects of Fe₂N NPs. The utilization of agricultural wastes as a precursor makes Fe₂N/N-PPC an ideal non-precious metal catalyst for ORR applications.Entities:
Keywords: Fe2N electrocatalyst; agricultural waste; biomass; oxygen reduction reaction; pomelo peel
Year: 2017 PMID: 29165362 PMCID: PMC5707621 DOI: 10.3390/nano7110404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of PPC, N-PPC, Fe-PPC, and Fe-N-PPC carbonized at 900 °C.
Figure 2(a) Raman spectra and (b) High-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of PPC, N-PPC, Fe-PPC, and Fe-N-PPC; (c) N 1s spectra of PPC, N-PPC and Fe-N-PPC; (d) Fe 2p spectra of Fe-N-PPC.
Atomic contents of the samples by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
| Samples | C | N | O | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPC | 90.94 | ≈0 | 9.06 | - |
| N-PPC | 96.39 | 1.61 | 2.01 | - |
| Fe-PPC | 96.21 | - | 3.27 | 0.53 |
| Fe-N-PPC | 95.86 | 1.60 | 2.21 | 0.43 |
Atomic ratio of N species from deconvolution N 1s spectra.
| Samples | Pyridinic | Fe-N | Pyrrolic | Graphitic | Oxidized |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPC | 25.9 | - | 15.0 | 34.5 | 24.6 |
| N-PPC | 31.9 | - | 10.8 | 32.2 | 25.1 |
| Fe-N-PPC | 32.2 | 9.0 | 12.8 | 33.6 | 12.4 |
Figure 3(a,b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of PPC; (c) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (d) Pore size distributions of PPC and Fe-N-PPC respectively.
Figure 4(a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images; (b,c) energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) patterns and high resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of Fe-N-PPC; (d) high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image and (e) EDS elemental mapping images (C, O, N and Fe) of Fe-N-PPC.
BET surface area and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore diameter of PPC and Fe-N-PPC.
| Sample | SBET (m2·g−1) | DBJH (nm) | Pore Volume (cm3·g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPC | 353.05 | 2.60 | 0.23 |
| Fe-N-PPC | 1103.90 | 3.48 | 0.96 |
Figure 5(a) The cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of Fe-N-PPC at a scan of 50 mV/s; (b) LSV curves of PPC and other samples at a scan rate of 10 mV/s and an electrode rotation rate of 1600 rpm; (c) LSV curves of Fe-N-PPC at various rotation rates and a scan rate of 10 mV/s; (d) Corresponding K–L plots at different potentials; (e) Long-term stability test of Fe-N-PPC and 20% Pt/C in a 0.1 M KOH solution; (f) Methanol (3 M) crossover resistance test.
Comparation of Fe-N-PC with Fe2N/C catalysts and pomelo peel-derived carbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) reported recently. In the table, reversible hydrogen electrode was abbreviated as RHE. GO stands for graphene oxide.
| Catalysts | Raw Materials | Onset Potential (V vs. RHE) | Half-Wave Potential (V vs. RHE) | Stability Result (%) | Methanol Tolerance Result (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIF-67@NPC-2 | Pomelo peel, cobalt(II) acetate, methyl-imidazole | 0.89 | 0.82 | 82.0 (6000 s) | 95.7 (3 M) | [ |
| Fe3C/WC/GC | Pomelo peel, K4Fe(CN)6, Na2WO4 | - | - | - | - | [ |
| Fe2N/MNGCS | Dopamine, NH3·H2O | 0.881 | - | 95.2 (60,000 s) | 70.7 (4 M) | [ |
| FeGH-ArNH3 | Fe3O4, histidine, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O,
| 0.80 | - | 94.4 (6000s) | >Pt/C | [ |
| FexN/NGA | GO, iron (II) phthalocyanine | >Pt/C | - | 91.0 (20,000 s) | ~100 | [ |
| Fe2N/N-GAs-20 | FeCl3·6H2O, sodium alginate, graphene | 1.02 | 0.93 | 90.0 (9 h) | ~100 | [ |
| Fe2N@NPC-500 | 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxlic acid, | 0.93 | 0.79 | 90.0 (25,000 s) | ~100 | [ |
| Fe–N-CNBs | FeCl3, fructose, magnesium powder, magnesium ribbon | 1.03 | 0.875 | 83.0 (30,000 s) | ~100 | [ |
| Fe2N/NGC-1000 | FeCl2, polyacrylic weak-acid cation-exchanged resin | 0.83 | 0.95 | - | - | [ |
| Fe-N-PPC | Pomelo peel, FeCl3·6H2O, ammonia | 0.966 | 0.891 | 79.6 (20,000 s) | 97.2 (3 M) | This work |