Literature DB >> 29165009

The Physical-Digital Divide: Exploring the Social Gap Between Digital Natives and Physical Natives.

Christopher Ball1, Jessica Francis1, Kuo-Ting Huang1, Travis Kadylak1, Shelia R Cotten1, R V Rikard1.   

Abstract

Older adults are the most digitally divided demographic group. The present study explores how older adults perceive the physical use of information and communication technologies (ICTs), particularly across generations and contexts. Data for the present study come from nine focus groups. Seniors acknowledge that ICTs help them connect with geographically distant social ties, but that they lead to feelings of disconnection with geographically close social ties. We label this phenomenon the "physical-digital divide," which exists when a group feels ostracized or offended when those around them engage with ICTs while they themselves are not or cannot engage with ICTs. Younger generations are often referred to as "digital natives" and older generations as "digital immigrants." A more apt label for older adults may be "physical natives," as their preferred method of communication involves physical face-to-face interactions and traditional codes of etiquette. Suggestions are made for reducing the physical-digital divide.

Keywords:  digital divide; focus groups; information and communication technologies (ICTs); older adults

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29165009     DOI: 10.1177/0733464817732518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Gerontol        ISSN: 0733-4648


  7 in total

1.  Adolescent Popularity: Distinct Profiles and Associations with Excessive Internet Usage and Interpersonal Sensitivity.

Authors:  Vasileios Stavropoulos; Emily Barber; Gabriel de Sena Collier; Jeffrey G Snodgrass; Rapson Gomez
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2021-05-25

2.  Impact of Age on Patients' Communication and Technology Preferences in the Era of Meaningful Use: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Martina A Clarke; Ann L Fruhling; Marilyn Sitorius; Thomas A Windle; Tamara L Bernard; John R Windle
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The second information revolution: digitalization brings opportunities and concerns for public health.

Authors:  Martin McKee; May C I van Schalkwyk; David Stuckler
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  The complex geographies of telelactation and access to community breastfeeding support in the state of Ohio.

Authors:  Tony H Grubesic; Kelly M Durbin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Older People's Use and Nonuse of the Internet in Sweden.

Authors:  Peter Anderberg; Lisa Skär; Linda Abrahamsson; Johan Sanmartin Berglund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The role of age and digital competence on the use of online health and social care services: A cross-sectional population-based survey.

Authors:  T Heponiemi; A-M Kaihlanen; A Kouvonen; L Leemann; S Taipale; K Gluschkoff
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-01-28

7.  Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults.

Authors:  Charlene H Chu; Rune Nyrup; Kathleen Leslie; Jiamin Shi; Andria Bianchi; Alexandra Lyn; Molly McNicholl; Shehroz Khan; Samira Rahimi; Amanda Grenier
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.