Literature DB >> 29164770

Clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery aneurysm after the first generation drug-eluting stent implantation.

Hyung Joon Joo1, Cheol Woong Yu1, RakKyeong Choi2, Jinsik Park2, Hyun Jong Lee2, Je Sang Kim2, Young Jin Choi2, Jae Hyoung Park1, Soon Jun Hong1, Do Sun Lim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, compared with patients without CAA.
BACKGROUND: CAA developed after DES implantation is a rare but associated with poor clinical outcome.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared 78 patients with CAA after DES implantation with 269 patients without CAA who underwent DES implantation for complex lesions (controls). The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR).
RESULTS: Morphologically, CAAs were saccular (32%), fusiform (13%), or microform (55%). The stent types involved were Cypher (n = 56, 71.8%) and Taxus (n = 22, 28.2%). During a median follow-up period of 1164 days, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the CAA group (26.9 vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001); the difference was driven mainly by nonfatal MI (11.5 vs. 0%, P < 0.001) and TLR (20.5 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001). The incidence of stent thrombosis was higher in the CAA group (12.8 vs. 0.74%, P < 0.001), irrespective of the maintenance of dual antiplatelet therapy. In the CAA group, Cox regression analysis showed significantly higher hazard ratios of CAA for MACE during the follow-up period. Further analyses after propensity-score matching of 65 pairs also showed similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MACE was higher in patients with CAA compared with patients without CAA after DES implantation. This difference was driven by TLR and nonfatal MI and widened over time.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery aneurysm; drug-eluting stent; major adverse cardiac event; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29164770     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Double Total Occlusion of Bioresorbable Scaffold in a Young Patient with Coronary Artery Ectasia.

Authors:  Mei-Tzu Wang; Wei-Chun Huang; Feng-You Kuo; Guang-Yuan Mar
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.672

2.  Coronary Artery Aneurysm after Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Sung Jin Hong; Hyoeun Kim; Chul Min Ahn; Jung Sun Kim; Byeong Keuk Kim; Young Guk Ko; Bum Kee Hong; Donghoon Choi; Yangsoo Jang; Myeong Ki Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Bioresorbable scaffold implantation in STEMI patients: 5 years imaging subanalysis of PRAGUE-19 study.

Authors:  Viktor Kočka; Petr Toušek; Martin Kozel; Andrea Buono; Martin Hajšl; Libor Lisa; Tomáš Buděšínský; Martin Malý; Petr Widimský
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 4.  Coronary artery vasculitis: a review of current literature.

Authors:  Shaun Khanna; Kartheek Garikapati; Daniel S L Goh; Kenneth Cho; Phillip Lo; Mohan V Bhojaraja; Surjit Tarafdar
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  A pebble clogging a river: a case report of thrombosed coronary aneurysmal ectasia.

Authors:  Akshar Jaglan; Tarek Ajam; Steven C Port; Tanvir Bajwa; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-18

6.  Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Ectasia.

Authors:  Muhammad Madkour; Patrick Hu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-07-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.