Literature DB >> 29164685

Vastus intermedius vs vastus lateralis fascicle behaviors during maximal concentric and eccentric contractions.

R Ando1,2,3, K Nosaka2, A Tomita4, K Watanabe5, A J Blazevich2, H Akima1,4.   

Abstract

Vastus intermedius (VI) plays a major role in knee extension, but its fascicle behaviors during dynamic contractions are not well understood. This study aimed to compare VI and vastus lateralis (VL) fascicle behaviors during singular maximal concentric and eccentric contractions. Thirteen men (27.1 ± 3.4 years) performed maximal isokinetic concentric contractions through knee joint angles of 105° to 35° (0° = full extension) and eccentric contractions from 35° to 105° at an angular velocity of 30°/s. Longitudinal VI and VL sonographic images were simultaneously recorded at 30 Hz, and muscle fascicle lengths at the knee joint angles of 40° and 100° were measured to compare the magnitudes of fascicle length change between the muscles. During concentric contractions, VI and VL fascicle lengths at 100° were 108 ± 12 mm and 104 ± 12 mm, respectively, and shortened by 36 ± 12 mm for VI and 28 ± 13 mm for VL (not statistically different; P = .13) at 40°. During eccentric contractions, VI and VL fascicle lengths at 40° were 72 ± 7 mm and 75 ± 8 mm, respectively, but lengthened by 35 ± 9 mm for VI and 24 ± 5 mm for VL at 100°, with a significant difference between the muscles (P = .01). These results indicate that VI fascicles are lengthened 1.4 times more than VL fascicles during eccentric contractions, whereas VI and VL fascicles shorten similarly during concentric contractions. This suggests a possibility that a greater mechanical strain is imposed to VI than VL during eccentric contractions.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic knee extensor contraction; muscle architecture; quadriceps femoris; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29164685     DOI: 10.1111/sms.13022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  5 in total

Review 1.  Does Muscle-Tendon Unit Structure Predispose to Hamstring Strain Injury During Running? A Critical Review.

Authors:  Shaun Huygaerts; Francesc Cos; Daniel D Cohen; Julio Calleja-González; Ricard Pruna; Pedro E Alcaraz; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Eccentric exercise per se does not affect muscle damage biomarkers: early and late phase adaptations.

Authors:  Nikos V Margaritelis; Anastasios A Theodorou; Panagiotis N Chatzinikolaou; Antonios Kyparos; Michalis G Nikolaidis; Vassilis Paschalis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Short-term neuromuscular, morphological, and architectural responses to eccentric quasi-isometric muscle actions.

Authors:  Dustin J Oranchuk; André R Nelson; Adam G Storey; Shelley N Diewald; John B Cronin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Anatomical and Neuromuscular Determinants of Strength Change in Previously Untrained Men Following Heavy Strength Training.

Authors:  J Trezise; A J Blazevich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Sarcomere length of the vastus intermedius with the knee joint angle change.

Authors:  Ryosuke Ando; Keigo Taniguchi; Shin Kikuchi; Shogo Mizoguchi; Mineko Fujimiya; Masaki Katayose; Hiroshi Akima
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.